Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Sweetfunny

Can you add few features in new sb ?
#remove urls with pr less then x
and same ability in page authority checker addon
#remove urls with pa less then x
#remove uels with da less then x
#remove urls with backlinks less then x

-=-

You can do all this now.

When you export pr, it gives you the choice to choose what PR to export, so if you want pr 5-10 only, just choose pr 5-10 and it will drop everything else.

With the page authority addon, just export to excel, sort by whatever metric you want, and then delete everything below/above that mark. Its a couple of extra steps but your already saving hours by not doing this all by hand anyway.

actually mat this happened to me when i updated from 1.61 - 163
as i dont have a roll back is there any way to get 1.61 again?
as i only use for proxy test purposes

Unfortunately the link for 1.16.1 seems to be 404. 1.16.0 and 1.16.2 work though.

http://www.scrapebox.com/dl/version10/scrapebox1160.zip
http://www.scrapebox.com/dl/version10/scrapebox1162.zip

It should be

http://www.scrapebox.com/dl/version10/scrapebox1161.zip

but no dice.

You could mail Sweetfunny and ask if they can upload the 1161 zip or send it to you

support (at] scrapebox [dot) com



Can you remind if we're able to check amount of index pages of a domain with scrapebox? Not if it's indexed in google or not but the exact numer of pages?

There is no "count" option like your asking, you could do

site:domain.com

Then you could check how many of the resulting pages are indexed and then export to excel, sort by indexed and not and then just delete the indexed and look at the number of rows with non indexed urls in excel.
 
Just purchased scrapebox. Id - 5U514969JK778560R

This should be fun. Hope i learn it quick enough
 
Can you remind if we're able to check amount of index pages of a domain with scrapebox? Not if it's indexed in google or not but the exact numer of pages?

Alternatively to what Loopline mentioned, you could goto Tools > ScrapeBox Text Editor, and load your URL's and under the Modifier option you can "Add site: in front of each line".

Then running that list in the Google Competition Finder will give you the count for a site: search for each domain like so:

CompFinder.png
 
All right I don't know if there a page to review scrapebox but I shoot here.

The best thing about Scrapebox is not what you think AT ALL.

For me beside the obvious, it's the lesson I got from the team behind. This lesson is name PLAYING FOR GLORY.

See I try to put myself in shoes of this guys, my product is A MUST in my industry, I can't say how many user but we talk HUGE number, you make a one AND ONLY payment for the update, the free support service, the plugin, the tutorials etc...

So what are this guys value ? They fucking not play for money, they can easily triple the price and make a payment every update, and make the price on the plugin.

They dodge A LOT OF MONEY.

Insane...

The thing is you have those who play because they enjoy the ride and those who try to get and have ultimately to realize the journey was the reward.

Scrapebox team don't give a shit, they PLAY FOR GLORY.

Badass.
 
Alternatively to what Loopline mentioned, you could goto Tools > ScrapeBox Text Editor, and load your URL's and under the Modifier option you can "Add site: in front of each line".

Then running that list in the Google Competition Finder will give you the count for a site: search for each domain like so:

View attachment 53997

Or you could do it the easy way like SweetFunny said, lol.

All right I don't know if there a page to review scrapebox but I shoot here.

The best thing about Scrapebox is not what you think AT ALL.

For me beside the obvious, it's the lesson I got from the team behind. This lesson is name PLAYING FOR GLORY.

See I try to put myself in shoes of this guys, my product is A MUST in my industry, I can't say how many user but we talk HUGE number, you make a one AND ONLY payment for the update, the free support service, the plugin, the tutorials etc...

So what are this guys value ? They fucking not play for money, they can easily triple the price and make a payment every update, and make the price on the plugin.

They dodge A LOT OF MONEY.

Insane...

The thing is you have those who play because they enjoy the ride and those who try to get and have ultimately to realize the journey was the reward.

Scrapebox team don't give a shit, they PLAY FOR GLORY.

Badass.

Well said!
 
I believe the recent versions of the link extractor plugin removed the option to "export not completed entries to file"? Is there a reason for this? I found this to be a very useful option and it sucks that it's not there anymore.

Also, is there a way (or possible update) for Scrapebox to retry entries that have a server error as opposed to a 404? I find that sometimes servers will crap out when checking a large number of pages simultaneously. I believe the "export incomplete" option counted those?

Thanks! Love the product; long time user.
 
Hi! Can i use IPv6 blocks and addresses as proxy? Or will it be available in scrapebox 2.0?
does using an ipv6 block mean that I would need a virtual NIC for each block? Hmm interesting!
 
Last edited:
Anybody have any issues with Scrapebox over RDP? I am RDP'ing to a Windows 8 machine, decent spec but the app is slow to respond, buttons take an age.

Other apps on the same machine are perfect.
 
One more suggestion/feature request: could it be possible for the link extractor to output 2 sets of files, one with internal and one with external links instead of combined like it is now? Thanks again.
 
I believe the recent versions of the link extractor plugin removed the option to "export not completed entries to file"? Is there a reason for this? I found this to be a very useful option and it sucks that it's not there anymore.

Also, is there a way (or possible update) for Scrapebox to retry entries that have a server error as opposed to a 404? I find that sometimes servers will crap out when checking a large number of pages simultaneously. I believe the "export incomplete" option counted those?

Thanks! Love the product; long time user.

The retry error should combat all of your issues, except for randomize. Randomize your list upon load, that way you are not hitting loads of the same domain at once (Assuming you have a diverse amount of domains loaded, or at least more domains then you have connections). Then set the error retry to higher and you should get a great result on the first run with no need to deal with anything else.


Hi! Can i use IPv6 blocks and addresses as proxy? Or will it be available in scrapebox 2.0?
does using an ipv6 block mean that I would need a virtual NIC for each block? Hmm interesting!

IPv6 will not currently work with scrapebox. No idea if it will be in 2.0.



Anybody have any issues with Scrapebox over RDP? I am RDP'ing to a Windows 8 machine, decent spec but the app is slow to respond, buttons take an age.

Other apps on the same machine are perfect.

Ive only RDP out on windows 8, but I have rdp into multiple OS, never with an issue. Its possible that the resources are about maxed out, that will cause slow response times.

Try an alternate remote connection, such as install team viewer in persistent mode and remote in with it, does it work better on that machine then RDP? I RDP into servers and team viewer into home versions of windows.
 
Just emailed support regarding a bug crash report for the broken links checker, is there anyway I can recover the progress scrapebox was making before the crash? I was doing +1k URLs.
 
The retry error should combat all of your issues, except for randomize. Randomize your list upon load, that way you are not hitting loads of the same domain at once (Assuming you have a diverse amount of domains loaded, or at least more domains then you have connections). Then set the error retry to higher and you should get a great result on the first run with no need to deal with anything else.
Thanks man. Where is the retry error settings? I honestly can't find them anywhere.
 
How many links ~ per second/minute it can scrape with 10 proxies ? I'm thinking about buying vps and getting 30 proxies, but if 10 would to the job then it would be fine.
 
Last edited:
Can someone help me?
I've got 10 dedicated private proxies and 4 connections for google harvester. But it seems google bans my proxies very very fast. I can't even scrape beyond 1000 urls for a lot of different keywords. ( no not 1000 urls from one keyword, but 1000 from all the keywords). Is it because I scrape with "inurl:hidden" footprint? Also I use "inurl:%KW% -2014 -2013 -2012" and I get no results but that could be of the banned proxies.
 
Just emailed support regarding a bug crash report for the broken links checker, is there anyway I can recover the progress scrapebox was making before the crash? I was doing +1k URLs.

No, unfortunately not, there is no live logging in the broken links checker.

Thanks man. Where is the retry error settings? I honestly can't find them anywhere.

Well that would be because I fouled up, there is no retry in the link extractor, sorry. I was thinking of the link checker settings. However you can export all as rows, and then just excel to sort the status column. Then you can grab all the errors and then use them again.

How many links ~ per second/minute it can scrape with 10 proxies ? I'm thinking about buying vps and getting 30 proxies, but if 10 would to the job then it would be fine.

Not really sure, I don't measure the speed, but 10 proxies would go pretty fast, it should be pretty decent though. The VPS probably won't help much, but more proxies would. I assume you running it on a home machine now? Google is light weight on pages, so adding more proxies to your home machine would allow you to use more connections and go faster. So unless your home connection is just Very slow, like less then 2 or 3Mbit then buying a vps won't likely help yo u scrape faster, but it would let you post faster and link check and other things that are more bandwidth and resource intensive.

Do you know estimated time for v2.0 to be released?

I have no idea, and I don't think Sweetfunny is going to try and post that. I can tell you from having hired out my own tools, nothing ever goes as planned. I can also tell you that in times past when Scrapebox was planning to release things they might tell me date X and then they were either early or late. Because little things sometimes that you can't forsee will set you back, while sometimes you can get thru other things quicker then what you think. Something this large could have any number of things go wrong.

I would "suspect" that the first time they post saying "its going to be released at X" it will be withing 1-4 days prior to the actual release, that or it will be "Its available now" But I know they are working on it non stop, so its always forward progress. They have 5 years of work to redo, so I can't even imagine the work involved in starting from the ground up.

Can someone help me?
I've got 10 dedicated private proxies and 4 connections for google harvester. But it seems google bans my proxies very very fast. I can't even scrape beyond 1000 urls for a lot of different keywords. ( no not 1000 urls from one keyword, but 1000 from all the keywords). Is it because I scrape with "inurl:hidden" footprint? Also I use "inurl:%KW% -2014 -2013 -2012" and I get no results but that could be of the banned proxies.

Are you putting your keywords in quotes like that? Like are you actually using

"inurl:%KW% -2014 -2013 -2012"

or are you using

inurl:%KW% -2014 -2013 -2012

?

With 10 dedicated private proxies and 4 connections you will get all your proxies banned. I wouldn't think it would be within the first 1000 results, but its entirely possible, especially if you have been banned multiple times before. 10 proxies and 1 connection is too many with those kinds of footprints.

When using advanced operators like that you would want to either use 20-30 proxies with 1 connection

or go to settings and uncheck "use custom harvester" and "use multi threaded harvester"

and then set the delay drop down to RND (in the lower right hand corner of scrapebox)

and then go to settings >> adjust rnd delay range and set the min to probably 5s and the max to30 and start there and go up if need be.

Also if you are using

"inurl:%KW% -2014 -2013 -2012"

with the quotes, then your getting no results because non exist. Check your resulting footprints in browser to see if they return results or not.

What is your goal there, to minus out the years of 2012 - 2014? Because its also going to be ineffective at best. Its not going to minus them out based on googles timeline for those results, its just not going to give you pages that actually have those dates on them, which will help, but if a pages was found in 2012-2014 but doesn't list the year it was published on the actual page then its still going to be returned.

If you want true date timelines based on googles time frame search then you would need to build a custom string in the custom harvester for your time frames.

Yes your going to ask, "how do I do that". Im going to make a video and post it, but Ill not post a hundred screenshots in this thread in case thats not what your talking about. Also there is some reference here:

http://scrapeboxfaq.com/how-can-i-c...-the-automator-or-custom-harvester-for-google


But bear in mind that requires you use the custom harvester, you can NOT use the custom harvester AND use a Delay. So you would need to add 10-20 more proxies and set the custom harvester at 1 connection for that to work. Not completely sure how this will work in Scrapebox 2.0, and I will probably wait till it comes out to make a video on the time span, but if you want more info I can post screens.
 
Really struggling to harvest anything. I have 40 - 50 proxies that are fast and work with Google but it just keeps giving me Error 403. I have set Proxy retries high.

When using Custom Harvester it seems to just hang?

I am just trying to do site:domain.com to get links from a page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top