Hi,
I'm getting error 302 (IP blocked) for harvesting results using google passed IPs. Sent email to SB support. Wondering if anyone having similar issue. Was working a few days ago. Using latest version of SB v 1.15.48.
Assuming your using advanced operators? If so:
[video=youtube_share;P9CbGhfc1aY]http://youtu.be/P9CbGhfc1aY[/video]
I used godaddy scraper and when I scrape for more keywords it doesn't add them to the list but rather replaces old list... any way to fix that ?
There is no merge option here. The easiest way to do it would be to send the urls back to the scrapebox harvester and then export them each time. Then when you are all done use the import >> import and add to - this will allow you to select all files and the merge them together.
Or you could export each csv and then hand copy them into 1 file.
Alternatively you could just search for a . (period) as all domains have a period in it, assuming your looking to get as many domains as possible.
Hello Sweetfunny. I purchased Scrapebox quite sometime ago and haven't used it for just as long. Since then I have changed address's and computers.
I receive an "access violation error" when trying to run Scrapebox. Please privately message me.
Sweetfunny doesn't PM. You will need to send the file called scrapebox.elf to support. Its in your main scrapebox folder. That contains the crash data and they can look at it from there. I can tell you, statistically, that 90%+ of the access violation errors are caused either by windows its self or 3rd part programs interfering. So first make sure you add full access allow rules to your anti-virus and firewall. Then try stopping any security related programs, like sandboxie, malware checkers etc...
Hello everyone, i've recently bought this software and it's realy amazing
The one thing, i cannot find, is there a posibility to scrape keyword suggestions (like google suggestions) using wildcards and a-Z, 0-9? There is a tool called keyword researcher 5.1, but i thought, maybe scrapebox do the same thing and faster?
Do you use this feature?
You can't use a wild card, but you can do it. You would make a keyword file and then merge it in with your keyword list. So you would do something like
%KW% a
%KW% b
%KW% c
%KW% d
%KW% e
%KW% f
%KW% g
%KW% h
%KW% i
%KW% j
%KW% k
%KW% l
%KW% m
%KW% n
%KW% o
%KW% p
%KW% q
%KW% r
%KW% s
%KW% t
%KW% u
%KW% v
%KW% w
%KW% x
%KW% y
%KW% z
%KW% 0
%KW% 1
etc...
Then put all your keywords in the main keyword box, and save the above in a text file. Then hit the M button, and select the text file. This will merge all those footprints into each keyword in your keyword box.
Then just highlight them and copy and paste them into the keyword scraper, or better yet save them to file and import them into the keyword scraper.
When the 'google passed' proxies anonymity check will get fixed in your software? Currently transparent proxies are showing up as anonymous proxies in that list. Is there a reason why SOCKS support is completely broken?
I am sure that many people would be happy to see in that list really anonymous proxies. According to my 24/7/365 proxy leeching/testing automation, approximately 60-65% of all current public proxies are transparent.
The question is, is this behaviour common for all SEO tools that transparent proxies are to be considered as google passes proxies?
SOCKS proxies work just fine for me, what are you talking about? Can you be more specific of how they are "completely broken"?
Here is the answer to your question about anon and transparent proxies. Its like this - Scrapebox works in certain "ways" The proxies you are talking about that can be discovered, will never be discovered when used with scrapebox, because of the "way" that scrapebox works. So L1 proxies can't be seen, even with the best of detection. L2 proxies are anonymous, but with great detection can still be found out. This is what your referencing. Scrapebox passed proxies are anonymous when used with scrapebox. Some of them may be able to be detected with various methods, but those elements never come into play when those proxies are used with scrapebox. So they are anonymous for all intensive purposes, at least for use with scrapebox.
Your not the first to point this out. But yes, SEO tools would naturally include 60% more proxies that worked with their tool, as they aren't building their proxy testers to test for use outside of their tool.
At the end of the day, the question is, what are you using them for. If everything you want to use them for works with the proxies that can be detected but work fine with the tools, and it makes no difference, then its nice that you spent the time to build a tool that can truely find out if they are anonymous or not, but its also irrelevant.
Was wondering if scrapebox.com is down, or if its just me facing this issue. I am trying to re-download scrapebox to my new server.
Here is the website that you can use to check it out. The one labeled website is obviously the website.
http://stats.pingdom.com/vz0wm9714wj5
source:
http://scrapeboxfaq.com/scrapebox-says-it-is-unable-to-connect-to-the-servers-are-they-down
