Grizzy
Senior Member
- Nov 11, 2008
- 920
- 1,005
Surely they wouldn't win though, I mean, courts are bound to interpret the laws as they are, not how they wish them to be. I'm no expert on CAN-SPAM or american law, but if the law only covers bulk email spam, anyone who is tried for anything else should get off, and if not, then the appeal court should definitely rectify it.
That's exactly what the defendant in one of these FB spam lawsuits tried to argue, and their motion was denied. It wasn't the first time the court allowed for a broader definition of the CAN-SPAM Act, one that would include non-email related communications, and it won't be the last.. The defendant and FB ended up agreeing to a settlement.