What is todays SEO? - Full Insight

[ScrapeBoss]

Good post. Google is becoming very advanced and way ahead of other search engines. That is why they are able to dictate what they want and you either follow it or regret.

 

[fastaccess]

After reading all the rehashed stuff from products about seo, this feels really refreshing. Bravo, thanks for the wonderful share. I really appreciate the time and effort you took and courteousness to share your insights for newbies

 

[buzz1212]

Hey Extrawinner, I thought your post was great. Alot of ppl rip ppl for writing good quality threads because someone metioned it or posted it here years ago. Hey I can
barely remember what I ate for dinner yesterday, alot of ppl appreciate your time and
effort. (REP) THANKS

 

[Gozpy]

I couldn't not to answer this.

You don't know if you understand the math behind the crap you have written in this thread? E.g. the PageRank model?

First of all if you do not agree tell me why, dont just throw some stuff at me.

Okay, let me rephrase my last comment. Mr. ExtraWinner, what you are saying is far from the truth.

If you don't understand the basics behind modern content scoring and term vectoring, you are probably not in any position to help those you call "noobs". As a matter of fact, you are probably among them yourself.

Second - this is a noob friendly guide to understanding some things happening around. Will I post technical stuff here? No, because technical stuff is not Noob friendly, and will help few.

There is a huge difference between writing something that is easy to understand and something that is just pure wrong.

Third - Pagerank model? Instead of loads of sh*t, post what you know. Oh, wait, you are taker, not giver.
I see you simply DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED, so simply refrain from posting here. You are apparently to smart and to busy with sharing, as your 2008 join date, 155 post count, and 10 rep shows it all. Only thing you can post is invites to membership sites, and post maximum 10 words replies to some threads.

Yes, a model. If you had the slightest idea of what you are talking about, you would know that a PageRank calculation is based on a vector model.

And yes, I usually don't care to engage in these kinds of forums, I have been testing a membership site and I have been a member of this forum 2 years longer than you have - though I'm not proud of it or using it as an argument.

You probably cant even accurately explain Google Dance, and why it occurs (without Google shitty stories). What I posted here explain this, help noobs and gives new, fresh insight. So - leach further, while I will be sharing. If you don't like something - PM me and we can talk.

I seriously hope you don't beleive that you, in this thread, accurately explained anything like that. Nor would I encourage you to keep going down this road, "giving fresh insights".

And to avoid any misunderstandings, yes, I do not agree with ANY of your so called explanations. And if you want a debate, you could start by answering my question. Do you understand ANY of the math behind this? Cause that would give me a clue of where to begin.

 

[ScrapeBoss]

SEO is a very complicated and controversial issue. Everyone is still learning, even though we might think we already know all. One thing I have come to understand is that there will always be something for you to learn. I don't regard everything as rubbish.

If I don't agree with any of what has been said, I just pick the ones that would be of help to me and leave the rest. Even Google does not fully understand SEO. That is why they keep changing their algorithm and making the whole world to move whereever they choose. We will always have different opinion on certain issues.

You don't know if you understand the math behind the crap you have written in this thread? E.g. the PageRank model?



Okay, let me rephrase my last comment. Mr. ExtraWinner, what you are saying is far from the truth.

If you don't understand the basics behind modern content scoring and term vectoring, you are probably not in any position to help those you call "noobs". As a matter of fact, you are probably among them yourself.



There is a huge difference between writing something that is easy to understand and something that is just pure wrong.



Yes, a model. If you had the slightest idea of what you are talking about, you would know that a PageRank calculation is based on a vector model.

And yes, I usually don't care to engage in these kinds of forums, I have been testing a membership site and I have been a member of this forum 2 years longer than you have - though I'm not proud of it or using it as an argument.



I seriously hope you don't beleive that you, in this thread, accurately explained anything like that. Nor would I encourage you to keep going down this road, "giving fresh insights".

And to avoid any misunderstandings, yes, I do not agree with ANY of your so called explanations. And if you want a debate, you could start by answering my question. Do you understand ANY of the math behind this? Cause that would give me a clue of where to begin.

 

[JesusBack]

You don't know if you understand the math behind the crap you have written in this thread? E.g. the PageRank model?



Okay, let me rephrase my last comment. Mr. ExtraWinner, what you are saying is far from the truth.

If you don't understand the basics behind modern content scoring and term vectoring, you are probably not in any position to help those you call "noobs". As a matter of fact, you are probably among them yourself.



There is a huge difference between writing something that is easy to understand and something that is just pure wrong.



Yes, a model. If you had the slightest idea of what you are talking about, you would know that a PageRank calculation is based on a vector model.

And yes, I usually don't care to engage in these kinds of forums, I have been testing a membership site and I have been a member of this forum 2 years longer than you have - though I'm not proud of it or using it as an argument.



I seriously hope you don't beleive that you, in this thread, accurately explained anything like that. Nor would I encourage you to keep going down this road, "giving fresh insights".

And to avoid any misunderstandings, yes, I do not agree with ANY of your so called explanations. And if you want a debate, you could start by answering my question. Do you understand ANY of the math behind this? Cause that would give me a clue of where to begin.

I think you're confused as to what extrawinner is getting at.

POT (point of thread) - explain basic SE spiders and how you can exploit their usage for your gain.

Your point - there is a lot more mathematical reasoning behind SEO then what OP is describing. Which is correct, but pointless of you to bring drama to the thread because OP did not intend (or does not know [probably does]) to explain the gritty details of SE spiders and engines and their respective mathematical formulas.

There are definitely many algorithms, formulas, and conclusions google comes to for your SERPs but it's very unfair to OP that you are he should sit down and have to explain it the way you want it to be explained and situated (detailed and mathematical).

Personal attacks are unfair as well but I think it'd be a conflict of interest if I challenged you to a SEO competition because I'm very good friends with extrawinner. All has been said and done.

</drama>

 

[plex_brahial]

I have a couple of questions:
what do you think about submiting ultra spinned articles to 100`s of directories with the conition it is 40%+ unique?
Social Backlinks: are you talking about social bookmarking or social networking. If its social networking should we aim just for the no--follow?
News feed=Press release?

 

[Daikoku]

Great article. Straight to the point and no useless information. Wish some more articles would be like this one.

 

[zerocoolflo]

Simple and newbie friendly info's. Good job ExtraWinner, I wish that some of the more "intelligent" people like Gozpy would like to explain themselves more if they know something that no one knows, instead of making sh***y affirmations.

 

[JesusBack]

Great article. Straight to the point and no useless information. Wish some more articles would be like this one.

scrapebox detected xD

 

[d4l1t0s]

scrapebox detected xD

It is more like scrapeboard or Xrumer

 

[Barbarossa]

The OP is just brilliant!! I felt like I was watching a documentary on National Geographic. Thanks a million ExtraWinner.

 

[reinie]

The OP is just brilliant!! I felt like I was watching a documentary on National Geographic. Thanks a million ExtraWinner.

I didnt hear anything about sharks,Lions, or Da Vince... lol

 

[Meozyn]

SEO is not for the arachnophobic

 

[Simas9]

Great share! I am just curious: why you were working for google only for a few days? Looks like you were there to install some keyloggers and quit

 

[SpaceAge]

This one is gonig on my Print List. Thanks for sharing

 

[maxthon]

thank great post really help for newbie like me

 

[bk071]

Great share! I am just curious: why you were working for google only for a few days? Looks like you were there to install some keyloggers and quit

Haha...
Post of the day

Bk...

 

[ezlegion]

Simple and newbie friendly info's. Good job ExtraWinner, I wish that some of the more "intelligent" people like Gozpy would like to explain themselves more if they know something that no one knows, instead of making sh***y affirmations.

Couldn't have said it better myself nice.

 

[jorisvoorn]

ExtraWinner, your nickname describes you well
this is an awesome post as many pointed out so far
You given a great great overview for n00bs

can you PM me or point out anything from you for more tehnical details maybe?
or just to chat about some ideas

thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE EXCELLENT WORK !!