Thinking About Launching a Telegram Betting Automation Business – Need Advice

[CashPhantom]

traffic being solved is huge, because most fail there. my take:

1. betting automation is still viable in 2026 if you manage account rotation and user education properly. users need discipline more than strategy
2. combining surebets and valuebets makes sense, just make it clear it’s about long-term consistency, not instant wins
3. cpa-only models usually attract low-quality users and increase churn. paid access filters serious users and protects your system
4. biggest killers: users not following instructions, bookmaker bans, overpromising results, and poor onboarding
5. personally I’d structure it with a clear onboarding sequence, a private bot, step-by-step guides for account safety, and recurring billing for retention. keep support tight, track account health, and emphasize long-term use over hype

if you manage expectations and account longevity, this can scale without burning out your user base

 

[markhanna55]

traffic being solved is huge, because most fail there. my take:

1. betting automation is still viable in 2026 if you manage account rotation and user education properly. users need discipline more than strategy
2. combining surebets and valuebets makes sense, just make it clear it’s about long-term consistency, not instant wins
3. cpa-only models usually attract low-quality users and increase churn. paid access filters serious users and protects your system
4. biggest killers: users not following instructions, bookmaker bans, overpromising results, and poor onboarding
5. personally I’d structure it with a clear onboarding sequence, a private bot, step-by-step guides for account safety, and recurring billing for retention. keep support tight, track account health, and emphasize long-term use over hype

if you manage expectations and account longevity, this can scale without burning out your user base

Thanks again for your reply, it was really helpful.

I wanted to ask you specifically about subscriptions and payments.

In your experience, would you structure it with:
- a higher initial payment and then a lower monthly fee,
- or the same recurring monthly price from the beginning?

My main doubt is how to handle users whose bookmaker accounts get limited relatively early.

For example, if someone is active only for 2–3 months due to account closures, how would you usually manage that situation in a sustainable way?

Would you accept natural churn as part of the model or simply design pricing assuming shorter customer lifespan?

Curious how you would personally approach this.

 

[toponeseller]

Excited to see the final product once it’s ready! Wishing you all the best in the meantime.

 

[Sundere]

Thanks again for your reply, it was really helpful.

I wanted to ask you specifically about subscriptions and payments.

In your experience, would you structure it with:
- a higher initial payment and then a lower monthly fee,
- or the same recurring monthly price from the beginning?

My main doubt is how to handle users whose bookmaker accounts get limited relatively early.

For example, if someone is active only for 2–3 months due to account closures, how would you usually manage that situation in a sustainable way?

Would you accept natural churn as part of the model or simply design pricing assuming shorter customer lifespan?

Curious how you would personally approach this.

Your idea is interesting, and I see you're from Spain like me.

If you'd like, you can send me a private message. I've been running a value betting service for a few months now, but it's "closed to the public"—no automation, just signals. It's mostly scraping, though.

Send me a private message if you want; I think it's interesting.

 

[markhanna55]

Excited to see the final product once it’s ready! Wishing you all the best in the meantime.

Thank you!

 

[markhanna55]

Your idea is interesting, and I see you're from Spain like me.

If you'd like, you can send me a private message. I've been running a value betting service for a few months now, but it's "closed to the public"—no automation, just signals. It's mostly scraping, though.

Send me a private message if you want; I think it's interesting.

Thanks for your reply! I have PM you. Great to see some Spanish on the forum.

 

[Wannsong]

Hello, i am also having telegram channel in this field, i have already clients and i offer interesting service related with value bets/info bets, if you want reach me out on PM we can probably be helpful each other, with your traffic and my service we can potentially convert clients and split profits

 

[appak]

Your idea is interesting, and I see you're from Spain like me.

If you'd like, you can send me a private message. I've been running a value betting service for a few months now, but it's "closed to the public"—no automation, just signals. It's mostly scraping, though.

Send me a private message if you want; I think it's interesting.

Hi i can be of value in your
team, i can make lots of bookmakers accounts on any platform that accept Nigerians, and i can place bets all day on these accounts. I receive the tips place the bets and log them, then we split the profits. Do let me know if you're intrested.

 

[MegaSmith]

biggest issue is not traffic it is user retention after accounts get limited
CPA only brings low quality users who quit fast after first problem
paid model makes more sense but support and refunds will eat time if expectations are not managed hard from day one

 

[trapstats]

Really interesting thread — and your distribution advantage is not something to take for granted, it's genuinely the hardest problem in this space.

One thing worth considering alongside the automation model: the bookie account limitation issue you keep coming back to is a structural problem that doesn't go away regardless of how well you onboard users. Every surebetting operation eventually hits that ceiling.

We've been working on a different angle in the sports betting data space — trapstats.co.uk focuses on greyhound racing analytics (UK and Irish tracks) using ML models. The model is fundamentally different: instead of arbitrage, users are getting calibrated probability outputs and Kelly Criterion staking guides. Bookie accounts aren't at risk because users are making informed bets, not mechanically exploiting pricing inefficiencies.

Not saying one is better than the other — they're genuinely different products for different users. But the long-term retention picture is different: an analytics user who has a good month from the data will come back indefinitely. A surebetting user who gets gubbed has no reason to stay.

Might be worth exploring a hybrid product structure if you haven't already — some users in your IPTV audience might be better suited to a data-guided approach than a full automation stack.

 

[trapstats]

Focusing on a paid subscription model instead of CPA is smart for building a serious user base and maintaining higher perceived value, and your experience with IPTV gives you a good foundation to work from

Appreciate that. The IPTV background definitely helps — you understand recurring churn patterns and how to handle support at scale. The main difference with betting automation is the account limitation curve is steeper and less predictable, so pricing that assumes shorter average LTV makes more sense from day one.