Puppeteer vs BAS for CTR bot

[Rashmar]

Hello guys. trying to create a simple bot for my own website to visit and perform some actions. However, I'm a little confused about Browser Automation Studio form bablosoft. I'm going to use my own proxies alongside Fingerprint Switcher.

Is BAS only for non-programmers and shouldn't be used if you can get your hands on puppeteer or it has some better features for anti-detection? Does BAS use puppeteer itself? If so, would the result be the same in my case?

 

[purecode]

About BAS it's not just for people who don't code. Sure it's got a visual interface which is great for beginners. But it has some useful anti-detection stuff built in that might save you time. Plus the visual interface can be faster for some tasks even if you can code. Does it use puppeteer? Not exactly. They have their own thing going. If the results are the same as puppeteer? Maybe maybe not. It really depends how you set things up in both. I'd say try both see what works better with your proxies and fingerprint setup.

 

[cokoporta]

BAS isn't just for non-programmers, but it's definitely designed for them. It's a visual, drag-and-drop tool where you can record actions (like clicks or form submissions) and turn them into scripts without having to write code. Think of it as a macro recorder with extra features - it's great if you want to run something quickly without diving into programming. Bablosoft markets it as a no-coding solution, and it's perfect for those who don't want to mess with JavaScript or debug console errors.

 

[Rashmar]

Both Puppeteer and BAS have their own advantages. Puppeteer gives more flexibility, but BAS is great for quick setups. Which one do you think works better for long-term CTR manipulation?

Well, based on the fact, that I will use chrome browser and google search, anti-detection would be the key element.

 

[Rashmar]

About BAS it's not just for people who don't code. Sure it's got a visual interface which is great for beginners. But it has some useful anti-detection stuff built in that might save you time. Plus the visual interface can be faster for some tasks even if you can code. Does it use puppeteer? Not exactly. They have their own thing going. If the results are the same as puppeteer? Maybe maybe not. It really depends how you set things up in both. I'd say try both see what works better with your proxies and fingerprint setup.

Thanks. Looks like I have to test them both at last. However, in some cases using BAS is actually harder and more time consuming. Using programming essentials like loops and conditions in a visual interface is not that easy. But, as long as they focus on anti-detection then they remain a great choice.

 

[Rashmar]

Can I rely on websites like:
https://bot.sannysoft.com/
https://www.browserscan.net/bot-detection
to test the bot detection?

 

[onlineseller20]

no BAS is just shi*** even more expensive antidetect will be detected

why u think BAS won't given BAS lacks more advanced spoofing features than most anti

at least it's detected by microsoft an example is I bought a outlook sign up bas-based bot then acc creation failed after orbit captchas solved I guess it's because BAS being detected by MS

also u can't leave BAS without human monitoring and hope it'll auto finish all CTR clicking for u
I tried two bas-based CTR bots one is ready-to-use another is custom coded
Both are purely trash
I don't know why they all auto-stopped saying "all resources eg proxies and keywords ...ETC are processed",
yet proxies input are still on the txt doc provided.
which caused me having to restart again and again manually
such a waste of time and money

 

[Steptoe]

Hello guys. trying to create a simple bot for my own website to visit and perform some actions. However, I'm a little confused about Browser Automation Studio form bablosoft. I'm going to use my own proxies alongside Fingerprint Switcher.

Is BAS only for non-programmers and shouldn't be used if you can get your hands on puppeteer or it has some better features for anti-detection? Does BAS use puppeteer itself? If so, would the result be the same in my case?

I would recommend Zennoposter over BAS: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/zennoposter-automate-any-web-tasks.1610513/

 

[Rashmar]

I would recommend Zennoposter over BAS: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/zennoposter-automate-any-web-tasks.1610513/

Thanks, just signed up.

 

[Rashmar]

Are there better libraries than puppeteer for my purpose?

 

[Rashmar]

no BAS is just shi*** even more expensive antidetect will be detected

why u think BAS won't given BAS lacks more advanced spoofing features than most anti

at least it's detected by microsoft an example is I bought a outlook sign up bas-based bot then acc creation failed after orbit captchas solved I guess it's because BAS being detected by MS

also u can't leave BAS without human monitoring and hope it'll auto finish all CTR clicking for u
I tried two bas-based CTR bots one is ready-to-use another is custom coded
Both are purely trash
I don't know why they all auto-stopped saying "all resources eg proxies and keywords ...ETC are processed",
yet proxies input are still on the txt doc provided.
which caused me having to restart again and again manually
such a waste of time and money

Based on my limited experience I can say that error handling in BAS is a little bit hard.

 

[bxxtarri]

no BAS is just shi*** even more expensive antidetect will be detected

why u think BAS won't given BAS lacks more advanced spoofing features than most anti

at least it's detected by microsoft an example is I bought a outlook sign up bas-based bot then acc creation failed after orbit captchas solved I guess it's because BAS being detected by MS

also u can't leave BAS without human monitoring and hope it'll auto finish all CTR clicking for u
I tried two bas-based CTR bots one is ready-to-use another is custom coded
Both are purely trash
I don't know why they all auto-stopped saying "all resources eg proxies and keywords ...ETC are processed",
yet proxies input are still on the txt doc provided.
which caused me having to restart again and again manually
such a waste of time and money

Did you try BAS first youtube ctr views?

 

[iamnotok]

If you are a developer, Puppeteer will be best

 

[myrize]

I want to do SEO with traffic and ranking with request proxy bot from Google. What do you recommend?

 

[confbersu]

no BAS is just shi*** even more expensive antidetect will be detected

why u think BAS won't given BAS lacks more advanced spoofing features than most anti

at least it's detected by microsoft an example is I bought a outlook sign up bas-based bot then acc creation failed after orbit captchas solved I guess it's because BAS being detected by MS

also u can't leave BAS without human monitoring and hope it'll auto finish all CTR clicking for u
I tried two bas-based CTR bots one is ready-to-use another is custom coded
Both are purely trash
I don't know why they all auto-stopped saying "all resources eg proxies and keywords ...ETC are processed",
yet proxies input are still on the txt doc provided.
which caused me having to restart again and again manually
such a waste of time and money

Honestly, I don't know why you're having such problems with BAS, but a friend of mine registered thousands of Outlook emails on his bot written in BAS at the beginning of this year, and he had no problems with it. It all depends on the quality of the proxy and fingerprints.

 

[Deleted member 731332]

Honestly, I don't know why you're having such problems with BAS, but a friend of mine registered thousands of Outlook emails on his bot written in BAS at the beginning of this year, and he had no problems with it. It all depends on the quality of the proxy and fingerprints.

BAS is pretty bad. It’s free for a reason. Zennoposter is the better choice for especially if you are doing CTR manipulation and other things like that where you need to pass as a real browser. It can also emulate phones, phone screen size, and touch events etc.

Edit* Zp interface is much better as well. Much more polished and imo easier to use.

 

[confbersu]

BAS is pretty bad. It’s free for a reason. Zennoposter is the better choice for especially if you are doing CTR manipulation and other things like that where you need to pass as a real browser. It can also emulate phones, phone screen size, and touch events etc.

Well, I used BAS for a long time and recently downloaded Zenoposter, and I will say that visually, BAS is much lighter and has more features than Zennoposter, but otherwise, it seemed to me that Zennoposter is stronger in a real browser emulation.

 

[V]

BAS is pretty bad. It’s free for a reason. Zennoposter is the better choice for especially if you are doing CTR manipulation and other things like that where you need to pass as a real browser. It can also emulate phones, phone screen size, and touch events etc.

Edit* Zp interface is much better as well. Much more polished and imo easier to use.

I manually create automations using Selenium and Playwright, but after reading about the features it has, I think I should give it a try.

 

[Deleted member 731332]

I manually create automations using Selenium and Playwright, but after reading about the features it has, I think I should give it a try.

It has a very good built in antidetect browser. It also has great documentation. Anyone interested I highly suggest reading the new documentation.

They do have a standalone antidetect browser called zennobrowser. It’s still in beta but you can sign up and use it with zennoposter. I haven’t tried it yet so I can’t comment.

The stuff about BAS having more features is total BS. I’m putting that one on ignore.

 

[confbersu]

It has a very good built in antidetect browser. It also has great documentation. Anyone interested I highly suggest reading the new documentation.

They do have a standalone antidetect browser called zennobrowser. It’s still in beta but you can sign up and use it with zennoposter. I haven’t tried it yet so I can’t comment.

The stuff about BAS having more features is total BS. I’m putting that one on ignore.

Well, at the moment, I agree that Zennoposter is now significantly better after they made it possible to combine Zennoposter with Zennobrowser, where you can fully customize your profile. And in BAS, the developers are somehow in no hurry to make good updates.
Even I have recently started using Zennoposter because websites detect emulation from BAS.