Does AI Content Hurts SEO?

Hello All,

Does AI Based Content hurt SEO If yes then how we can find those type of content and remove or rewrite it?
AI-generated content can potentially harm SEO if it's low quality. Use SEO tools to identify unnatural language or plagiarism, monitor user engagement metrics, and consider expert review. Rewrite or remove low-quality content to maintain a strong SEO presence.
 
Nope, I've been running some tests and it works better than I have expected.

dPc0ik.jpg
 
AI content is well good for a website unless it hurts the Seo if it has no originality in the content. So try creating the article with AI adding originality to the content.
 
AI-generated content can potentially harm SEO if it's low quality. Use SEO tools to identify unnatural language or plagiarism, monitor user engagement metrics, and consider expert review. Rewrite or remove low-quality content to maintain a strong SEO pr
Google devalues. It doesn't harm. There's a big difference.
 
I can't imagine paying for content these days or writing yourself just for google.... those times are long gone. This is the biggest waste of money and time. AI content is the only way to still make few $ on google... and maybe even more if you are clever and lucky.
 
I was using AI and got hit by a penalty but who is to say it was the AI.

To be honest It was not run through a humanizer, it wasn't fact checked and it was 100% AI detected.
 
Two of my sites got hit heavily by google and two sites didn't (and actually are gaining traffic/positions). Content on all of them is edited by me (not copy-pasted from chatgpt) and the approach to creating texts was the same. Honestly, i can't see the logic why one site is hit and another promoted
 
Hello All,

Does AI Based Content hurt SEO If yes then how we can find those type of content and remove or rewrite it?

It doesn't, no.

Trying to detect AI is completely futile. Too many false positives and false negatives.

And it will only get worse and worses with time as more and more AI content gets mixed in and new models are created. It's a losing battle.

Why do you think Google have taken the approach of heavily relying on user engagement?

Right around the time when they switched from saying "content writen by humans for humans" to "content that's helpful to humans". ;-)

Content is judged on whether users like it or not.

Your focus should be on creating content that users want to read and which answers their questions. That's it. Nothing else.
 
March core update can answer u

March core update has zero to do with AI detection.

The only way to combat low quality mass produced AI content is by focusing on engagement metrics, and that's what they've done. They started in Sep 2023, but the march one was more extreme.
 
Yes, AI-generated content can hurt SEO if it's low quality or lacks originality. To identify and improve it, use tools like Copyscape to check for plagiarism, and enhance the content with unique insights and better readability
 
Haha, this question is a bit funny. Quality is the most important thing. If it is done by humans, the result will be the same if the quality is not good. Don’t rely solely on the content generated by AI. You are the most important thing.
 
Think of it as AI-aided

Use the AI for the overall word count, but fix the text to human readable standard
 
Hello All,

Does AI Based Content hurt SEO If yes then how we can find those type of content and remove or rewrite it?
It can hurt SEO, but it doesn't, for sure, mean it will be penalized by Google. As per my experience, Google tends to focus on the content more and not how that content was created. AI generated content can be SEO friendly as long it is Human edited and provides some value.
 
I feel for competitive niches AI just isn't good enough

Personally I can spot AI content very easily (also here on the forum) and have grown a distaste towards it

However, that doesn't mean it doesn't work short or mid term, or even long term, because not everyone will notice
 
Back
Top