- Oct 24, 2011
- 3,227
- 3,630
I, too, am a Jarvis Boss Mode user and a total Jarvis fanboy. I feel like I've mastered the art of using Jarvis, but I'm really interested in this Autopilot.So, I was given a 5 days trial plan. I tried creating 2 articles with the autopilot 1-click article feature. I'm speechless...
I'm a boss mode user of Jarvis. I regularly use it so I know its capabilities pretty much. And I'm telling you what Sensit's autopilot just created is way better than whatever you can get with Jarvis.
Sensit doesn't repeat itself, it connects ideas and paragraphs hence building logical interconnection throughout the article. I literally could not believe that was a thing written by an AI. I run it on multiple plagiarism checkers (I suspected that the tool is just taking pieces from different articles online and constructing a new full article out of them), it was clean.
So my first impressions are very positive. Looking forward to running a few more tests and maybe starting a new niche site filled with only Sensit created articles as a case study.
Glad to see your review.
I love these reviews by Jarvis users.Review Time:
I was given a 7-day trial plan by @Cognitive with the option to create up to 6 articles with the AutoPilot feature. I created 6 articles and I have no words other than Check-F***ing-Mate to any other AI programs out there.
A Little Background:
I have been using Conversation.ai/Jarvis/Jasper (not as much as I should be) but I have been using it. I really have nothing bad to say about Jarvis, other than it doesn't even remotely come close to Sensit.ai. Jarvis is good for what it does but still could use some work on a few things. Comparing Jarvis to the slew of other AI writers out there I think Jarvis wins hands down, with one caveat, I have personally not used any other AI writer out there. But I have watched a crap TON of YouTube videos on about every other AI writer out there, and just based on that, IMO they suck.
Is it fair to compare AIs if you have never tried them? No, but from watching the videos and seeing the output they produce, Jarvis wins hands down in my book. I know Jarvis and many of the other AI writers get TONs of flack on the output and how they are still 10 years from actually being a useful AI writer. The only thing I have to say to that is if you feel that way, you really do not know how to correctly use Jarvis or any AI writer for that matter. I don't get why so many people think that all these AI writers are just, push a button and get a 2,000-word perfect article. Ain't gonna happen, BUT if you know how to correctly use an AI writer, you can easily guide it and get a nice 2~3K-word article ready to post. (Granted it will take some niche research and a few hours of work of your time.)
Impressions:
Will Sensit.ai give you a 1,000~1,500-word article with the push of a button and a few minutes of wait time? 100% YES.
Will that said article be perfect? NO.
My Results:
I made 6 articles, the first one which I thought would be a good niche, but it turns out I was wrong. The article read VERY well. MUCH better than the content I have been getting from Jarvis.
BUT... I was getting dates and other info that at first glance looked just fine until I ran some of it through Google. The 'facts' and dates were quite a bit off. Like everyone else knows that have used AI tools, they are NOT fact-checkers. So since that niche relies heavily on facts and dates, I didn't write anymore for that niche.
Article #1 - A wash. (A wasted Article, no biggie)
Article # 2, 3, 4 & 5 I picked another niche that is more evergreen(ish) in nature and doesn't rely too much if at all on dates or facts. I'm not going to go through each article, but I will do a summary of them all because they were all about the same. I think I spent (on the high end) probably 1 hour at most to have 5 articles fully ready to post on my site. Article word length is as follows: 1,273 / 1,263 / 1,354 / 1,256 / 1,317. I found my Title from ahrefs, I let Sensit auto-generate my description and then I used "Inspire Me". I then opened the results and got some keywords and added that to the Keywords box, and then used Google Suggest to get a list of questions and made an outline to put in the Outline box. I recommend doing that all to get some amazing results. I then generated the article which took a minute or two. I put that article into Grammarly Premium, and spent about less than 5 minutes cleaning up any grammar issues it found, thus putting my score at 99 out of 100. Then I checked for plagiarism and the results for each article were as follows: 5% / 3% / 4% / 4% / 4%. Virtually 0 plagiarism. All it found were a couple of commonish phrases that were on sites completely unrelated to my niche.
Could I just click on every button to have the AI generate pretty much everything but the title for me? YES
Could I then just take that article and post it on my website and still have it be very readable and of excellent quality? YES
Was it worth it to spend an hour doing a little extra work to get 5, 1,300 ish-word high-quality articles ready to post? YES
Could I hire and train a VA to do exactly what I did to get the same quality of output and churn out another 600+ 1,300 ish word, high-quality articles to dominate this niche? More than likely, yes
Conclusion:
1,000% blown away.
Picture Time:
From Grammarly - The article score
View attachment 203784
From ahrefs - My website
I bought this expired domain back in Nov 2021 and posted 31 Articles on it in Dec 2021.
When I got it there was 0 Organic Traffic and 0 Organic Keywords, the rest of the stats were the same.
From Jan & Feb 2022 the Organic Traffic is up to 15 and Organic Keywords is now at 45.
Also looks like I have a few things to clean up in my health score as well.
View attachment 203785
I'd like this same kind of trial. I'm doing "the dance" and want to take this thing for a test drive.