[Journey] 1 million UVs/month in 12 months using AI generated content. Let's do it!

[spectrejoe]

That doesn't answer the question though of why it takes 4000 articles to produce the same results traffic wise that 160 whitehat ones could.

Surely the stuff niffo said of onpage seo is not the reason as that could be easily automated in the bot as well which I am sure you are doing.

Not trying to take anything away from what you have achieved. It is an honest inquiry into why there is such a disparity between human generated content and the ai stuff if you mimicked the ai stuff to such a level that it passes for human content.

those 4000 aren't nearly as old as the 160 whitehat ones probably.
Traffic tends to increase as your rankings can take up to a year to stabilize and reach their peak

 

[Sartre]

Do they accept spam blogs? Is there any hidden trick to get approval?

adsense is fine with this piece of crap https://midogguide.com/
The trick is getting accepted with decent content and then add crap later. Google only pretends to care. All they care about is $$$$
It's also easier through shit-tier ad middle-men like Ezoic cause they got Premium AdX accounts so you got no limits on ads. Harder to get banned with them.

@Sartre I assume your program scrapes relevant content from other websites & then paraphrases , etc etc... The obvious right? (Except ofc you have your own twists & you clearly do it better than most people since you can produce high quality posts)

However, I have a question, when scraping content, do you think using 200-300 words from a website is too much? So like:
200-300 words from Website 1
200-300 Words from Website 2
200-300 Words from Website 3

Obviously you'd paraphrase them but still, do you feel like that's too many words & if possible we'd be better of just getting 50-100 words max per website to 100% avoid duplicate content issues or you don't think it matters?

Also how did you get over the proxy issues triggering captchas when scraping PAA's with Helium?

We're taking very little, 50-100 and paraphrasing from each site to avoid copyright issues. Adding lots of images, youtube videos, etc.

That doesn't answer the question though of why it takes 4000 articles to produce the same results traffic wise that 160 whitehat ones could.

Surely the stuff niffo said of onpage seo is not the reason as that could be easily automated in the bot as well which I am sure you are doing.

On page SEO and user signals are enough to differentiate between great whitehat content ($200/1000 words etc) and AI generated content.

 

[mdevo]

That doesn't answer the question though of why it takes 4000 articles to produce the same results traffic wise that 160 whitehat ones could.

Surely the stuff niffo said of onpage seo is not the reason as that could be easily automated in the bot as well which I am sure you are doing.

Not trying to take anything away from what you have achieved. It is an honest inquiry into why there is such a disparity between human generated content and the ai stuff if you mimicked the ai stuff to such a level that it passes for human content. Why isn't there a near 1:1 correlation in terms of traffic results and article count to produce the traffic?

It depends on multiple factors. You can reach 100k UV with one-page site within year and you can achieve the same thing on website with 5000 articles within one year.
It depends on keywords, backlinks, whole on page SEO, niche, methods, etc, etc.

 

[Cendla]

Good luck on your journey my friend.

 

[Apexworks]

adsense is fine with this piece of crap https://midogguide.com/

I only read one article, (this one: https://midogguide.com/maintenance-and-care/how-can-u-tell-if-a-dog-has-been-neutered.html) but that one read well to me. Good explanations that I think were mostly factually correct.

Do you mind explaining why you think this content is crap?

Or is it just the top articles on the home page that are decent and then they use lower quality elsewhere?

 

[mdevo]

I only read one article, (this one: https://midogguide.com/maintenance-and-care/how-can-u-tell-if-a-dog-has-been-neutered.html) but that one read well to me. Good explanations that I think were mostly factually correct.

Do you mind explaining why you think this content is crap?

Or is it just the top articles on the home page that are decent and then they use lower quality elsewhere?

It's crap because it's 100% duplicate content. AdSense won't accept sites with such content. It doesn't even really matter if it's factually correct.

 

[b00bz]

It's crap because it's 100% duplicate content. AdSense won't accept sites with such content. It doesn't even really matter if it's factually correct.

That site IS running AdSense.

 

[mdevo]

That site IS running AdSense.

Yeah, someone already mentioned why and how. I think I did that too, I don't just remember if it was in this thread.

 

[b00bz]

Yeah, someone already mentioned why and how. I think I did that too, I don't just remember if it was in this thread.

Ah alright. Either way, AdSense isnt the only ad-network on the planet. Im sure many others will accept duplicated content just fine.

 

[mdevo]

Ah alright. Either way, AdSense isnt the only ad-network on the planet. Im sure many others will accept duplicated content just fine.

Majority of those which accept such content, pay like 30% of earnings which you can get with AdSense (and AdSense isn't paying much either, compared to even Ezoic) + they sometimes insert fishy ads on your website.

 

[Apexworks]

It's crap because it's 100% duplicate content. AdSense won't accept sites with such content. It doesn't even really matter if it's factually correct.

Thanks.

I didn't run a duplicate check or anything, just read the content as I was expecting it to be some spun crap, but it was readable and made sense to me.

 

[prvncqr]

Majority of those which accept such content, pay like 30% of earnings which you can get with AdSense (and AdSense isn't paying much either, compared to even Ezoic) + they sometimes insert fishy ads on your website.

Did you ever try to get approval from AdSense to such sites?

 

[mdevo]

Did you ever try to get approval from AdSense to such sites?

Yes and I successfully applied with few domains. Up and running till today.

 

[prvncqr]

Yes and I successfully applied with few domains. Up and running till today.

can you please share the trick?

 

[Alexion]

I don't want to be rude, but some of you need to really read AND understand the narrative of what's being discussed here. Otherwise, there are going to be the same questions over and over.

 

[Alma]

It's crap because it's 100% duplicate content. AdSense won't accept sites with such content. It doesn't even really matter if it's factually correct.

They do accept sites with such content

 

[mdevo]

They do accept sites with such content

In all cases I tested they rejected sites with pure duplicate content.

can you please share the trick?

Sure. In my case it was like:
- buy expired domain;
- fill domain with placeholder content that is not duplicate (in my case content from Webarchive worked like charm) - I did it with 5 - 10 pages filled with content and got approved several times;
- make sure there are all required pages eg. Pricacy Policy;
- wait until all pages get indexed;
- apply to AdSense
- get approved
- fill domain with whatever you want, but remember that there is always risk of getting your site banned for T.O.S. violations

 

[prvncqr]

In all cases I tested they rejected sites with pure duplicate content.

Sure. In my case it was like:
- buy expired domain;
- fill domain with placeholder content that is not duplicate (in my case content from Webarchive worked like charm) - I did it with 5 - 10 pages filled with content and got approved several times;
- make sure there are all required pages eg. Pricacy Policy;
- wait until all pages get indexed;
- apply to AdSense
- get approved
- fill domain with whatever you want, but remember that there is always risk of getting your site banned for T.O.S. violations

Thanks a lot for sharing the valuable information.

 

[Alma]

In all cases I tested they rejected sites with pure duplicate content.

Sure. In my case it was like:
- buy expired domain;
- fill domain with placeholder content that is not duplicate (in my case content from Webarchive worked like charm) - I did it with 5 - 10 pages filled with content and got approved several times;
- make sure there are all required pages eg. Pricacy Policy;
- wait until all pages get indexed;
- apply to AdSense
- get approved
- fill domain with whatever you want, but remember that there is always risk of getting your site banned for T.O.S. violations

That's weird. I tested exactly this. Had 6 months old domain that never had any content except for about us and TOS. Added about 300 PAA articles and applied for adsense. Got accepted in 3 days.

 

[prvncqr]

That's weird. I tested exactly this. Had 6 months old domain that never had any content except for about us and TOS. Added about 300 PAA articles and applied for adsense. Got accepted in 3 days.

That is good too. But, his method has a higher chance of getting approved since the domain is very old.