roydan
Elite Member
- Dec 17, 2013
- 5,618
- 14,572
I know that this may sound a bit hasty or harsh, but hear me out.
As I understand it, a shitlist starts a long time before it's published on the forum. When all the evidence is being collected and an effort to solve it behind closed doors is being made. When a shitlist post is up, It's already after the seller (or a buyer) is already aware of it and chose not to cooperate.
What I think should happen is:
BST locked with some sort of warning stating that there's a shitlist in process.
If it's a buyer, restriction to the shitlist and a rank should be changed to shitlist in process or something similar.
This is to fight some users' effort to try and cash out before they're gone for good.
As I understand it, a shitlist starts a long time before it's published on the forum. When all the evidence is being collected and an effort to solve it behind closed doors is being made. When a shitlist post is up, It's already after the seller (or a buyer) is already aware of it and chose not to cooperate.
What I think should happen is:
BST locked with some sort of warning stating that there's a shitlist in process.
If it's a buyer, restriction to the shitlist and a rank should be changed to shitlist in process or something similar.
This is to fight some users' effort to try and cash out before they're gone for good.