UnluckyGuy
Junior Member
- Oct 8, 2015
- 127
- 40
The best way to prove your theory is showing results.
Why don't you make a case study ranking a website using your theory?
Why don't you make a case study ranking a website using your theory?
DA Black Hat Dead - Try Braided Multi-tier Black Hat
- Thread starter winatnorisk
- Start date
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_farm, once npromoted by Inktomi.
2. The place holders in your article will be for one link to a higher tier (there are 10 tiers and 65 sites below you) where you straddle them according to increasing numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, ...9) where 1 is your page. See Pascal's Pyramid for example of how to arrange target URL's and arrange placeholder URL's, where you have two lists (CVS) where they differ only in that the Target list does not have your URL,
Right now I am doing a lot of diagrams with 3D triangles to make the pyramid as strong and optimized as possible, with best link density, link life, and try to come up with an Excel power series (programmable formula for excel spreadsheets you upload after downloading URL's, keywords, scraped content, etc.) as a true link popularity farm I am designing and I will give away that information here. I have not decided how to make money, possibly by collecting donations, selling advertising, etc. but money becomes less important as automation becomes more dominant.
Please ask BassTrackerBoats why my new post on Inktomi wheels is not public. And for some reason, I can't upload images.
1. Scrape website pages (url's) ranked #51 to #116 under the keyword of your choice
2. The place holders in your article will be for one link to a higher tier (there are 10 tiers and 65 sites below you) where you straddle them according to increasing numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, ...9) where 1 is your page. See Pascal's Pyramid for example of how to arrange target URL's and arrange placeholder URL's, where you have two lists (CVS) where they differ only in that the Target list does not have your URL,
It is a lot of work and need to start a team of people to employ idea, test, and report back. I am also learning with the feedback I get here to perfect the theory before I create a macro or "pattern" with best black hat SEO software (ScrapeBox is the only option, plus good article writing software).
Right now I am doing a lot of diagrams with 3D triangles to make the pyramid as strong and optimized as possible, with best link density, link life, and try to come up with an Excel power series (programmable formula for excel spreadsheets you upload after downloading URL's, keywords, scraped content, etc.) as a true link popularity farm I am designing and I will give away that information here. I have not decided how to make money, possibly by collecting donations, selling advertising, etc. but money becomes less important as automation becomes more dominant.
himanshudixit9742
Newbie
- Dec 29, 2020
- 5
- 0
What i can get from these triangles is : focus on consistency. We need to make a equilateral triangle. Yes equilateral triangle focuses on equity of all forms and DA of backlinks.
RichKIDLK
BANNED
- Aug 30, 2020
- 1,198
- 1,157
Your attitude is "below 0"
Josh Saga
Banned - Inappropriate behavior
- Oct 9, 2020
- 576
- 1,698
I'm quite geniunely interested in this concept- I have a decent knowledge in Math as well, however It's been a while, but overall I'll give this a follow and you as well for further updates.
Thanks for this!
kaudo
Power Member
- Jan 9, 2015
- 580
- 857
Means there are many other factors you have to analyze including some factors you don´t even know. You are at the beginning with an attractive but still just a half-thought-out idea and a huge amount of work to do. I wish you a good luck.
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
Nope, well thought out, do it right the first time and understand true Google semantics and I have done organic molecule analysis since 1988 and Google is no different, as software and simulations are 3D, not 2D, time being the 4th dimension with Fourier, etc. Why did Paul Allen spend $100 million on the Brain Trust? In Britain they are doing the same thing with living brains to verify a physical analogy for everything. Not half-thought-out, about 90% but of course it evolves and get's better, as testing already proves law-of-diminishing returns. With cooperation from a team here and the other Black Hat sites, social media groups (competition is highly necessary to take down big money who want their scams to perpetuate, Damen knows that as well as I do), look less greedy to do better, then in the long run money goes away because of robots, hybrids, and free outer space, I find braided multi-tier (circular and pyramidal) to be highly necessary.
???? What about paragraphs?
Yes, give me time to "do it right the first time", hard to keep simple, I have to study Scrapebox and Excel formulae to make it more "cookie cutter".
Last edited:
Sir Maximillion
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 25
- 119
If that’s all there is to it, then I don't see why it’s not worth a punt, I suppose a good compromise this early could be to get people to do their own testing and deduce any correlations?
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
Hi,
A guy at Inktomi came up with the idea of link popularity farms about 18 years ago until Google decided to penalize people for link swapping (two links pointing to each other, opposite direction):
They are just directory pages with hyper-linked titles over descriptions. Inktomi created a directory (which becomes a multi-tier taxonomy, like "construction" -> "excavation -> "cement pouring" where surfers create their own categories, sub-categories, and minimum "threading": it becomes etched in stone as a niche or category (Fourier, big wave is the sum of the little wave, not just 3D space, but interpolated the past and extrapolate the future, even the time interval is decided on by natural log e calculations, the result of Jacob Bernoulli and why air plane wings are shaped the way they are).
And as computers get faster with more RAM and hard drive space, better OOP caching, and governments collapse, more regulations go away and supply versus demand future's market analysis become more accurate, trends analysis become more accurate and required. In the 1970's, the NFL had more blow-outs, the Dolphins had a perfect season, the Buccaneers had a perfectly-imperfect season, but even with more free agents and more competition for closer scores (Gaussian statistics is the opposite of the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics I use, where more competition, where you can't do better than 100%, means higher margin of error for closer game-score outcomes) Reno's Harrah and their batting average in predicting game-outcomes is getting more accurate.
So you put up a directory page that will look like this for link popularity farms on your site:
So my proposal is to bring back link popularity farms, only without link swapping. When you login to create a dynamic PHP plugin page (and these plugins were largely non-existent until after link popularity farms died around 2008) the "centralizer" can update them with new additions, better content for descriptions, but to give surfers a reason to read and click on links, we as black-hat-to-white-hat "transformation" people want to post comments, at first involuntary, and give administrators a reason to retain the links. If the acceptor is at first low Pagerank, that means at first they are less likely to have the minimum "post without links" restriction, and less likely to administer at all until they suddenly see more traffic, maybe the first form mail post other than spam, because an insane number of websites get no human engagement.
I have a lot more to say about building torus's instead of tetrahedrons in the future. There will more cooperation from people who don't like hierarchies with a voluntary pure white hat proposal as opposed to black-to-white hat thinking. It means a lower relative Pagerank for the "top of pyramid wishful thinker", but you don't want to have an eventual Gordon Gecko melt-down. Pyramids collapse when someone removes that one link, less likely with braiding, and far less likely when more people embrace mutualism and the need for "strength in numbers" where you don't need much money with good ideas to take down big money.
Pyramids, but I just 6-face tetrahedrons, not the 5-face Pyramids of Cheops, are designed to put to work the fewest number of slaves laying the fewest bricks while maximizing volume to lay to rest the most Pharos, unlike tall or short pyramids The same is true (maximum volume to surface area) for cubes versus long boxes, spheres versus ellipsoids, or planes that if too big, even with same shape, density, turbo-prop restrictions, can't fly because of scaling, Relative viscosity is also a problem for larger aeronautical objects.
Tune in as I explain why maximum moment of inertia (roll or climb at the fastest rate as a function of shape, calculated for round objects) is maximum for a donut or torus and necessary to exploit here. And torus's are less work to build with better link density for higher retention rate than spheres. Non-round objects like pyramids can have moment of inertia calculations, and are very low. While Google matrices don't revolve, the human and robot do relative to "fixed" matrix, so I believe these calculations will be important when studying the "two keyword relevance" scores for links, independent of non-link article content.
Stay tuned...
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,123
Those images have a lot of similarity to a linkwheel just with more moving parts. Maybe I'm missing something there but there are some ineffective aspects to those interlinking the backlink properties.
Linkwheels no longer work as Google sees them as manipulating the algo.
At one time they were the bomb but now they hurt a site.
Maybe others of you that were in the SEO game back when Lemonarian ws touting that and how effective it was until things came crashing down.
Remove some of that interlinking and there may be some value there for sure but I would only try that kind of backlink infrastructure on a test site and not a real money site.
Linkwheels no longer work as Google sees them as manipulating the algo.
At one time they were the bomb but now they hurt a site.
Maybe others of you that were in the SEO game back when Lemonarian ws touting that and how effective it was until things came crashing down.
Remove some of that interlinking and there may be some value there for sure but I would only try that kind of backlink infrastructure on a test site and not a real money site.
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
But they are not two way, one way, I see no publications where Google bans one-way wheels, do you? Semantically, it would be the wrong thing to do, as sometimes it may happen by accident, kind of like common like the common "hooks" out there.
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
Yes, I need cascading article scrapers, the best spinners, and for Matt (PayPal won't let me buy Scrapebox GD it) uploadable programmable spreadsheets are important for my summation of n -1 push-pop-stack algorithms.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,123
Specifically here:
You have elements in there that are closing the loop - much like your hook.
Granted some of that is going to happen naturally at times but too much and you end up with this on steroids:
To me I see a massive linkwheel and again I may be missing something.
As to Google not making a public statement about that kind of backlink infrastructure I would dismiss what they say anyway as they fall under the adage that if their lips are moving they are lying.
Matt does not have a business interest in Scrapebox, that is owned by @Sweetfunny so maybe hit them up as to why your PP won't work with them.
I've got 3 copies and I am sure I paid using PP back when I bought them.
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
I think it would be impossible, and again, not semantically the right thing to do. My torus idea is truly unique, but like old link popularity farms, voluntary and white hat. But eventually, if Google wants you to believe white hat is good content, black hat is bad, it becomes very much the opposite when the robots produce better content, like with my multi-tier cascading "reference grabbing" scrape, merge, spin, post philosophy for article writing. And spinning will have directionality factors too with a thesaurus (eg. a mixed-breed is a dog and a mongrel, a dachshund is a dog but NOT a mongrel), so the Russian" Ta"r guy is right, as you have one way links, but different relevance scores for links for donor versus acceptor, not comparative total article-to-article content.
Damen would not take my money for advertising "permission-based robots" here at BHW, and would not say why.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,123
I think you mean Damien but he typically does not handle the advertising personally.
Odds are you did not get a response as it is the Holiday season and the entire crew is not working every day.
winatnorisk
BANNED
- Dec 24, 2020
- 83
- 32
Okay, this was three years ago, which is fine, as the ideas are better now and will help BHW customers.
Matheus Moreira
Power Member
- Jul 14, 2017
- 753
- 405
Lmao.What is this sh*t?
Anyone can sum it up bit easily?
What is Pascal doing here?
Physics & Chemistry both were pain in my ass.
Can we talk about something cool?
Maybe Jonny sin's law or Mia khalifa's law
Waiting for the aliens to show up in this theory...