DA Black Hat Dead - Try Braided Multi-tier Black Hat

Manual to automatic, white hat to black hat, top-of-pyramid comment posting: Benedict Arnold treason:

benedict-arnold.jpg



Always automatic, black hat to "black hat is white hat" non-link swap wheel comment posting: Stockholm Syndrome

ss.png

For descending article/reference scrapers, paragraph keyword relevance, SD elimination, and spun personal anchor text placeholder insertions (call it MuTReSaS or "Mutt" for "Multi-Tier Reference Scraping and Spinning" from now on, we need a new hash) you're right, but programmable Excel spreadsheets, you can still exploit other factors of the three.

Your attitude is "below 0"
Yeah, I know.
 
Those tools are all good ones but you'll need to build out something customized to do what you want to do. Even back in 2012 or so we did not rely on those alone as they do not offer the functionality to create and post content that would have a snowballs chance to have a positive effect on rankings in Google.
I know I look at semantics a lot for the future, where combined subtle adjustments not only to article writing but link building may force Google to conform to outsider AI as their job is to sell AdWords ads, keep the CPC high with quasi-monopoly status, becoming a lot greedier in recent years with interlacing, where even Facebook (not a search engine, but Google and Facebook are 87% of all Internet advertising) does not label their ads as "sponsor ads" like 2017 and prior. Bad content means people are forced to click on and buy from AdWords people, but then again they have lost market share to their competition (all Googlebot licenses) starting in 2015 with Bing, Yandex, even Yahoo, and a fast-growing Chinese competitor as China does do as much harsh censorship like they did in the old days. Google is in trouble, but if CMS people start using SEO again, while adding a lot more people and sites, although AdWords CPC will go down at first, it will then later go up as the increased surfer/blogger population increases and capitalizes on cheaper AdWords.

I am not sure why there be a precipitous drop-off after 3 tiers, but Google still does intermittent human score corrections, and a robot blast in 2012 with millions of links a month from BHW alone (but there are many other quasi-AI article writer/link builders then) means a sudden three-tier limit, just like when they banned spreadsheets temporarily in 2004 a day after I employed 3-column AdWords word mergers, and replaced source code trending keywords with images a day after I used Python word scraper for Google Trends.

Big G has a large, 24/7 staff with many templates where they can respond very quickly to threats, no matter how legitimate, and you can only learn a lot by challenging them as white papers are just propaganda. You don't give up but keep hammering away with strength-in-numbers innovations and blasts, profitable if a shared affiliate network (eg. Use WheelsOfTrueFortune to place payable affiliate link on sites with form blast of scraped affiliate accounts, and form mail blast username and password that must be changed or warn how admin will lose valuable CPS income. No response after 3 attempts, you keep the money). When true AI is here, they will use instant, dynamic, relative score adjustments like the non-link-endorsement search engine I am designing, and "saturation" means peace and poverty-quashing.

07learningcurve.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 07learningcurve.jpg
    07learningcurve.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 0
It's interesting. You may partially get an idea how Google works by your research, but google have many other "Filters" beside algorithm. one site ranking on top gets demoted to 10th page in a single update, I am sure here, the algo has not changed but the new filter pushed it back. If you are trying to test your method using spun articles, you may get caught by any of the filter and you will never know what happened. There are many other things when link effect kicks in,so many variables..

Do you have any input on these filters? Like what major/minor factors does it check and update.
 
Why was he banned - I was interested in his stuff :weep:


yeah - interested to know why he got banned? was it because of the nonsense that he was saying? his sentences and paragraphs did not make sense
 
yeah - interested to know why he got banned? was it because of the nonsense that he was saying? his sentences and paragraphs did not make sense
I quite understand a bit what he was trying to merge - basically he's trying to use theories in physics thinking it can relate to SEO > or Google's algo. He was trying to bridge a connection.

Sadly the guy was Russian and best he can do is Google Translate - plus he doesn't write properly with sentences so the thought or phrases are jumbled together.

I tried to keep up - I understood a good chunk of what he was 'proposing' but it's all theory anyways - still a good read for me
 
I quite understand a bit what he was trying to merge - basically he's trying to use theories in physics thinking it can relate to SEO > or Google's algo. He was trying to bridge a connection.

Sadly the guy was Russian and best he can do is Google Translate - plus he doesn't write properly with sentences so the thought or phrases are jumbled together.

I tried to keep up - I understood a good chunk of what he was 'proposing' but it's all theory anyways - still a good read for me
I think Winatnorisk is not Russian. If you want to understand him better, search James Dante Wood.
As for the theory, he is probably right as to the eigenvector nature of google pagerank. I believe that this is how it could have started years ago in the head of Sergej Brin, whom he mentions so often. Even if it was still so and Winatnorisk´s methods would work, backlinks are just a small part of the whole picture.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top