DA Black Hat Dead - Try Braided Multi-tier Black Hat

Yes, I need cascading article scrapers, the best spinners, and for Matt (PayPal won't let me buy Scrapebox GD it) uploadable programmable spreadsheets are important for my summation of n -1 push-pop-stack algorithms.

It's interesting. You may partially get an idea how Google works by your research, but google have many other "Filters" beside algorithm. one site ranking on top gets demoted to 10th page in a single update, I am sure here, the algo has not changed but the new filter pushed it back. If you are trying to test your method using spun articles, you may get caught by any of the filter and you will never know what happened. There are many other things when link effect kicks in,so many variables..
 
Lmao.

Waiting for the aliens to show up in this theory...
alien saucer.jpg

See https://www.spaceelevatorx.com/flying-saucers/ . From the "X files", or be careful what you wish for you might get it!

alien.jpg

It's interesting. You may partially get an idea how Google works by your research, but google have many other "Filters" beside algorithm. one site ranking on top gets demoted to 10th page in a single update, I am sure here, the algorithm has not changed but the new filter pushed it back. If you are trying to test your method using spun articles, you may get caught by any of the filter and you will never know what happened. There are many other things when link effect kicks in, so many variables..

Hi,
You have nested spins, and elimination of exclusive synonym mismatches (eg. a "mixed breed" is a "dog" and a "mongrel", but a "dachshund" is a "dog" but NOT a "mongrel") with the need for data structures or pointers with small database disk space requirement, easier to access, maybe the result of a good algorithm to scrape and process thesaurus.com, to distinguish between exclusive and inclusive (AND OR truth table logic) words, and later word groups (eg. "Mary had a little lamb", "Marylin was accompanied with a small sheep"). But Google could counter as you are just saying the same thing, even with paragraph spin for time-independent writing of non-introduction and conclusion paragraphs, if they invest, as you say, in massive filters with proper analysis. They can easily punish spun articles if they just look at all the same forward link that points to your money site, one link with spun-only content, and drop you from first page to 11th, like you say, with little horse power. That is why multi-tier braided pyramids and mutual torus's are the answer as you help others endorse others, with you using others through uninvited black hat to point to you at the top of pyramid as a money site, or invited/at-first-uninvited mutual torus building, as too much horse power is probably needed to look at spun-only content when they differ with multiple links/anchor text.

The secret, I think, is multi-tier article and paragraph "reference checking and referring" scraper, spin, merge, and post algorithm. For example, you spider and grab Wikipedia page for content based on keyword search, their hyper-texted keywords, references at the bottom of the page, descend just one tier to spider those pages pointed to, break up into paragraphs, as each paragraph becomes a different field for 3 tables (target Wikipedia page, keyword pages, and reference pages). You want to spin 500 word new articles with, say, 5 paragraphs averaging 100 words, to 10 paragraphs averaging 100 words) and while smaller than or bigger than 500 word articles are not that big a deal, but will not elude Google link checkers unless you build build multi-tier pyramids if they compare all the articles with same forward link, and see a problem. The new spun articles can look at keyword relevance between keyword and reference paragraphs between each other to only write, say, 300-700 word articles where the keywords overlap more often, or get rejected if outside of standard deviation.

The fear of bad chronology (time order relationship between paragraphs) can be addressed by breaking up Wikipedia into linear groups of 10 (to write 10 new paragraphs) and if keyword relevance, with what on average should be 100 other pages for keyword/reference pages, and about 700 paragraphs, and unless they agree with the proper sequential order of Wikipedia article order by not doing falling in standard deviation (you can do a checksum, quick way to compare), you get rid of it. 69% fall within the standard deviation, so that means the spinning of about 500 paragraphs, and without merging or word/sentence fragment spins, tens of thousands of articles. You can add a sentence at the end of a paragraph with anchor, "This is my example of my contribution to [keyword] at example.com." with some spintex., sometimes placing sentence at the end of other paragraphs.


Google will probably have to deprecate the value of the uniqueness rewarding-score (scalar) where only more obvious plagiarism is penalized, a non-linear function.

What i can get from these triangles is : focus on consistency. We need to make a equilateral triangle. Yes equilateral triangle focuses on equity of all forms and DA of backlinks.
There needs to be testing to prove multi-tier (say, you have 3 tiers below you, 3 sites each, for 9 total links) versus 1 tier with 9 total back links still means 3 tier is a higher Pagerank. I will do some Eigenvector calculations to try to show this is always true even though Google has the right to change their score. If you criss-cross, because Google is an organic matrix, not as simple as a pyramid with bricks who all point down from gravity, as horizontal bonds can be as strong or stronger than gravity, then you preserve matrix life as multi-tier black hats fear that one removed back link that kills a lot of hard work. It is based on my real stress versus strain analysis on organic cables for a space elevator in outer space where gravity is not too dominant, and Google is a perfect analogy.
 

Attachments

  • alien saucer.jpg
    alien saucer.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 3
How you doing @tar729 ? All good? Still spewing out your unfounded crap theories, I see.

Is the lack of scrapebox only thing holding down your research? Might lend you mine if so. Hell, might throw some money in the mix too. Just to see you proving just how much are slavic (or maybe only russian?) people superior when compared with the rest.

Whatcha say?
 
How you doing @tar729 ? All good? Still spewing out your unfounded crap theories, I see.

Is the lack of scrapebox only thing holding down your research? Might lend you mine if so. Hell, might throw some money in the mix too. Just to see you proving just how much are slavic (or maybe only russian?) people superior when compared with the rest.

Whatcha say?

Not tar729 dummass, but thank you for volunteering information and for more risk assessment data as you are accumulated by the matrix for re-programable simulations.

matrix robots.jpg

Any backround info / citations / or even patent filings from Big G to back any of this up?
no, patents are a joke, they don't volunteer critical details.

this is all just waffle with zero proof, what has Quantum machanics got to do with google aglo

absolutely nothing
Everything. Study votexes with discrete mathematics (electron linked to paths called "super-strings", vector-node relationship), a lot more on this later...

The best way to prove your theory is showing results.
Why don't you make a case study ranking a website using your theory?
On the way. New, quickly evolving "vortex" concept.
 
Looks like spam to me sorry.

Looks like old days with gsa

Why did you bother 3 tier still works

Tier onto tier might be a winner
 
Why did you bother 3 tier still works
You have more tiers to stay ahead of competition, then "vortexes" that close at, say, an enclosed 3 tiers, but you add posts to same blogs once the admin is friendly to your long term post requests with AI wiki and reference scraping, merging, spinning with paragraph-to-paragraph keyword relevance checks, and posts.

Looks like spam to me sorry.

Looks like old days with gsa

Why did you bother 3 tier still works

Tier onto tier might be a winner
Nope, uses trends analysis to anticipate word and article changes.
 
That has been tested... you only benefit extremely minimally after the 3rd tier.
How many nodes per tier, or irrelevant?

Looks like spam to me sorry.

Looks like old days with gsa

Why did you bother 3 tier still works

Tier onto tier might be a winner
It is spam as in "uninvited", call it Stockholm's Syndrome, but white hat only is a joke and big and grandfathered firms are otherwise impossible to compte against.
 
How many nodes per tier, or irrelevant?

We have done a silly number using automation and spun content using Jon's spinner.

Our bills for our servers back then were over 5K a month as we did a lot of testing and served a lot of clients and generated millions of links a month.
 
We have done a silly number using automation and spun content using Jon's spinner.

Our bills for our servers back then were over 5K a month as we did a lot of testing and served a lot of clients and generated millions of links a month.
I am confused. When I think of tiers I think of layers on a link-pyramid or SEO final result matrix, are you talking about nested spins (spins within spins)?
 
I am confused. When I think of tiers I think of layers on a link-pyramid or SEO final result matrix, are you talking about nested spins (spins within spins)?

Layers on link pyramids (we had hundreds of variations) using nested spun content using Jon's spinner.

I've been around that block more times than there are droplets of water in the 7 seas.
 
Layers on link pyramids (we had hundreds of variations) using nested spun content using Jon's spinner.

I've been around that block more times than there are droplets of water in the 7 seas.
So the "burden of responsibility" means more uniqueness between spun articles for more tiers. I worked with Jon's software a lot in 4 years, and find it very mundane. Did you do merging? Did you do overlap studies to reject close overlaps? Paragraph scraping, with multi-tier scraping, is the answer, with personal "endorsements" (like writing a book report on, say, "A Tale of Two Cities", where you scrape the e-book, commentaries by the author, Charles Dickens, Wikipedia, Cliff Notes, Master Plots, etc., and place holders for merged lists, which could be spun, are your personal input about the book and author). Jon does not do Gaussian statistics like me and Google (rejecting non-keyword relevant articles or paragraphs not within standard deviation), kind of like the 3 points test in quantitative analysis for chemistry.
 
So the "burden of responsibility" means more uniqueness between spun articles for more tiers. I worked with Jon's software a lot in 4 years, and find it very mundane. Did you do merging? Did you do overlap studies to reject close overlaps? Paragraph scraping, with multi-tier scraping, is the answer, with personal "endorsements" (like writing a book report on, say, "A Tale of Two Cities", where you scrape the e-book, commentaries by the author, Charles Dickens, Wikipedia, Cliff Notes, Master Plots, etc., and place holders for merged lists, which could be spun, are your personal input about the book and author). Jon does not do Gaussian statistics like me and Google (rejecting non-keyword relevant articles or paragraphs not within standard deviation), kind of like the 3 points test in quantitative analysis for chemistry.

You were lauding and applauding Jon a few ago which is why I referenced him.

Yeah, we did paragraph scraping, merging articles and content ( as many as 10 in a post) from a crap load of sources grabbing content that was relevant to the KWs that were being targeted, linked in to the sites using those KWs and long tails (these days that would be changed as SEO has changed), used outside links from authority sites in the content... the whole nine yards.

What you are suggesting in your commentary and in your images is old stuff that is no longer effective.

If it were I would still have that automated service churning out stupid numbers of links and charging clients for the effort but the link churning can still go on but to take money from someone for that would not be fair or ethical.

The big words you use I honestly do not know, and I have a fairly decent vocabulary, nor do I have any higher education in math, but the real life experience with SEO processes as you are suggesting I do know and they just plain have little to no effect and in many cases will cause a site to sink like the Titanic.
 
You were lauding and applauding Jon a few ago which is why I referenced him.

Yeah, we did paragraph scraping, merging articles and content ( as many as 10 in a post) from a crap load of sources grabbing content that was relevant to the KWs that were being targeted, linked in to the sites using those KWs and long tails (these days that would be changed as SEO has changed), used outside links from authority sites in the content... the whole nine yards.

What you are suggesting in your commentary and in your images is old stuff that is no longer effective.

If it were I would still have that automated service churning out stupid numbers of links and charging clients for the effort but the link churning can still go on but to take money from someone for that would not be fair or ethical.

The big words you use I honestly do not know, and I have a fairly decent vocabulary, nor do I have any higher education in math, but the real life experience with SEO processes as you are suggesting I do know and they just plain have little to no effect and in many cases will cause a site to sink like the Titanic.
I am talking about article writing, not the more "mundane" or simple spinning concepts. Again, the devil is in the detail, because of my proposal to bring back link popularity farms without two way links. I know quantum mechanics (quantum is the the same word, for a mathematician, as discrete, with absolute numbers for link value, article value, etc., there is a relationship between the two. But multi-tier scraping, not just posting, with what I call reference scraping, along with merging or placeholders for spun personal contributions is important here, probably not thought of.

For example, if you want to solve:

2x + 3y = 10
x + 4y = 16

Two equations, and two unknowns, you can do substitutions. so:

3y = 10 - 2x, y = 10/3 - 2/3 x,
4y = 16 - x, y = 4 - 1/4 x,

so:

10/3 - 2/3 x = 4 - 1/4 x, -2/3 x + 1/4x = 4 - 10/3, -8/12x + 3/4x = -5/12x = 2/3, so x = 24/15 = 8/5, and therefore y = 4 - 1/4(24/15) = 4 - 24/60 = 4 - 2/5 = 18/5;

Without substitutions, required for a lot more equations with a lot more unknowns, you must take the determinant of the matrix and perform various linear algebra (where the "direction value" for a link is important, the eigenvector which is a "vector scalar value" thought to be link relevance, like Tar correctly said, for "donor content value", and it is multiplied by a scalar that has no direction, which is ""acceptor content value"). While matrix calculations in linear algebra have to square or orthogonal, the "spaghetti like" nature of linked pages means you simply have "zero" for many of the coefficients. To predict how to create your own tetrahedron or torus with your money site at the top or middle respectively, there is way to "pre-Googlebot, pre-Pagerank" your results in advance and compare, use SEMRush, SEMQuake, etc., to verify. Also, remember, the need for long tail keywords is greater with higher demand than ever, so that increases targeting and even traffic with high demand, low competition, trending upward keywords, when quite often searchers will look up keywords you don't even optimize for but two different long tail keyword strings in your article will still just enough in proximity, with other word search combinations not thought of, that can lead to a bust when you study your analytics. If you don't sell what the surfer is looking for, more affiliate relationships, like with the people you post to in your down-line, and my invention, post paid links, means more opportunities.


Torus's attracting more participation because of higher moment of inertia are hard to understand concepts until tested, like Einstein being doubted until Eddington proved General Relativity to be real with the total eclipse of the Sun in South Africa in May of 1920. I was able to just now purchase a new version of Scrapebox, so what I call reference scraping (grabbing paragraphs, like one of your surfers said, spinning, but the failure, unless Jon keeps it a secret because of his new article writing service, is probably something that I will have to test as well. This is not old GSA stuff, just try to make your schema (don't have to be a software engineer) cause bots to think like a human brain, and like Alan Turin said in the fifties (the first of the great computer minds, invented machine and assembly language) your robots will reproduce. "Art becomes life" as you go from Lucas' "Phantom Menace" to "Attack of the Clones", it probably will happen and will be something you have to prepare for.
 
You keep throwing theory and noise in there.

I've taken the shovel to the dirt and found out what does and does not work.

You're a good guy as you are giving it a run but theory without real life experience is empty commentary.
 
You keep throwing theory and noise in there.

I've taken the shovel to the dirt and found out what does and does not work.

You're a good guy as you are giving it a run but theory without real life experience is empty commentary.
Okay, I will talk to Matt (Loopline), Jon (Prosperative), and Sven (GSA), and do personal tests and release the data, with verification of schema, excel programmed spreadsheets, and SEMRush data. Organic indexing is 6 weeks, give me about 9 weeks (March 1, 2021?) I should have results.
 
Okay, I will talk to Matt (Loopline), Jon (Prosperative), and Sven (GSA), and do personal tests and release the data, with verification of schema, excel programmed spreadsheets, and SEMRush data. Organic indexing is 6 weeks, give me about 9 weeks (March 1, 2021?) I should have results.

Those tools are all good ones but you'll need to build out something customized to do what you want to do. Even back in 2012 or so we did not rely on those alone as they do not offer the functionality to create and post content that would have a snowballs chance to have a positive effect on rankings in Google.
 
How you doing @tar729 ? All good? Still spewing out your unfounded crap theories, I see.

Is the lack of scrapebox only thing holding down your research? Might lend you mine if so. Hell, might throw some money in the mix too. Just to see you proving just how much are slavic (or maybe only russian?) people superior when compared with the rest.

Whatcha say?
coleman.png
 
Back
Top