Google releasing a large update today

This doesn't mean much. Number 1 for what? You have 5000+ articles, so you must be ranking for more than 1 keyword.

Quick maths doesn't tell you anything. You have a population size of 1 in your statistical analysis.

It's not scientific, nor is it a statistical analysis. I rank in that position for 5 or 6 keywords that matter to me. My point is, as with many Google updates, that having great quality content (and plenty of it), with a genuine backlink profile; rarely results in being penalised in a significant way. I have 3 or 4 sites in different niches, none have been affected so far. It's perfectly possible that any problem is yet to come, but for now they're looking good.
 
My site...
#1 in Google a year ago
#1 in Google a day ago
#1 in Google a minute ago

But also - has no spammy links, 5000+ unique articles and less than 100 backlinks.
Quick maths tells us that content is still king.
I wonder for how many kw you rank on position 0 and 1, would you mind share? Thanks!
 
How long until I can notice a difference in my ecommerce site? GSC should pick this stuff up first right?
 
In short, Google does not want user generated content no more. No more bloggers or personal writers, they want only big players who have many experts and writers who can produce academic content which is verified and all that shit (that's in theory). The reality is they are ranking Youtube videos of a 14 years old kid and the featured snippet that keep all the answers in the search engine page.

Google is going day after day to control the internet and providing searchers with their crap to make more money with paid ads.
 
They actually giving us this information....


Content and quality questions
  • Does the content provide original information, reporting, research or analysis?
  • Does the content provide a substantial, complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • If the content draws on other sources, does it avoid simply copying or rewriting those sources and instead provide substantial additional value and originality?
  • Does the headline and/or page title provide a descriptive, helpful summary of the content?
  • Does the headline and/or page title avoid being exaggerating or shocking in nature?
  • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Would you expect to see this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
Expertise questions
  • Does the content present information in a way that makes you want to trust it, such as clear sourcing, evidence of the expertise involved, background about the author or the site that publishes it, such as through links to an author page or a site’s About page?
  • If you researched the site producing the content, would you come away with an impression that it is well-trusted or widely-recognized as an authority on its topic?
  • Is this content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably knows the topic well?
  • Is the content free from easily-verified factual errors?
  • Would you feel comfortable trusting this content for issues relating to your money or your life?
Presentation and production questions
  • Is the content free from spelling or stylistic issues?
  • Was the content produced well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Does the content have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Does content display well for mobile devices when viewed on them?
Comparative questions
  • Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
  • Does the content seem to be serving the genuine interests of visitors to the site or does it seem to exist solely by someone attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
Not.all.websites.are.blogs google! Where did you get that?
 
In short, Google does not want user generated content no more. No more bloggers or personal writers, they want only big players who have many experts and writers who can produce academic content which is verified and all that shit (that's in theory). The reality is they are ranking Youtube videos of a 14 years old kid and the featured snippet that keep all the answers in the search engine page.

Google is going day after day to control the internet and providing searchers with their crap to make more money with paid ads.

thats only true for ymyl type of sites
Wtf kind of academic content will they rank if im in the woodworking / sewing niche for example.. for these kind of niches it doesnt matter if im a brain surgeon or some grandma called josephine
 
thats only true for ymyl type of sites
Wtf kind of academic content will they rank if im in the woodworking / sewing niche for example.. for these kind of niches it doesnt matter if im a brain surgeon or some grandma called josephine

Yes you're right and I agree but just like you said a and gave example of a woodworking niche, which is not popular and can't make you millions!
 
Let's see how much impact would it cause on my sites

Will the difference would be shown from today or tomorrow traffic data?
 
Back
Top