- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,093
- 30,761
Google releasing a large update today
- Thread starter bartosimpsonio
- Start date
D
Deleted member 1313244
Guest
Here we go again.
Vizla
Junior Member
- Apr 12, 2020
- 129
- 112
- Jul 23, 2014
- 1,625
- 937
Luco
Banned by request of account holder
- Dec 7, 2016
- 1,020
- 1,109
Finally!!!
Hope they fix all shit with this one!
unsungwarrior
Supreme Member
- Sep 14, 2012
- 1,419
- 805
This is all they say...... 
Focus on content
As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to fix. This said, we understand those who do less well after a core update change may still feel they need to do something. We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.
Focus on content
As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to fix. This said, we understand those who do less well after a core update change may still feel they need to do something. We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.
This is all they say
Focus on content
As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to fix. This said, we understand those who do less well after a core update change may still feel they need to do something. We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.
Such bullshit. I did work on my content on my site. I typed over 200,000 words of handwritten content and I'm nowhere to be found after January's core update while spammy web 2.0's are everywhere.
D
Deleted member 1313244
Guest
This is all they say......
Focus on content
As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to fix. This said, we understand those who do less well after a core update change may still feel they need to do something. We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.
Whitehat wins out again.
TheVigilante
Banned - Multiple Rules Violations
- Aug 31, 2010
- 15,002
- 16,108
I say bring it on
VelocityServ
Regular Member
- Aug 31, 2007
- 315
- 221
Haha so literally all they did is talk themselves in a circle without giving any informationThis is all they say......
Focus on content
As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to fix. This said, we understand those who do less well after a core update change may still feel they need to do something. We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.
leechesBleechin
Supreme Member
- Feb 16, 2017
- 1,218
- 3,224
Can't wait to see what new opportunities arise.
unsungwarrior
Supreme Member
- Sep 14, 2012
- 1,419
- 805
They actually giving us this information....
Content and quality questions
Content and quality questions
- Does the content provide original information, reporting, research or analysis?
- Does the content provide a substantial, complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
- Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
- If the content draws on other sources, does it avoid simply copying or rewriting those sources and instead provide substantial additional value and originality?
- Does the headline and/or page title provide a descriptive, helpful summary of the content?
- Does the headline and/or page title avoid being exaggerating or shocking in nature?
- Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
- Would you expect to see this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
- Does the content present information in a way that makes you want to trust it, such as clear sourcing, evidence of the expertise involved, background about the author or the site that publishes it, such as through links to an author page or a site’s About page?
- If you researched the site producing the content, would you come away with an impression that it is well-trusted or widely-recognized as an authority on its topic?
- Is this content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably knows the topic well?
- Is the content free from easily-verified factual errors?
- Would you feel comfortable trusting this content for issues relating to your money or your life?
- Is the content free from spelling or stylistic issues?
- Was the content produced well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
- Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
- Does the content have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
- Does content display well for mobile devices when viewed on them?
- Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
- Does the content seem to be serving the genuine interests of visitors to the site or does it seem to exist solely by someone attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
D
Deleted member 1132725
Guest
They sneak these updates in in silent. I have the same issue and the graph does look similar.