Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[pyronaut]

I don't understand...?

As i mentioned, you can make 1 comment and have 1,000 backlinks show up in Yahoo if that 1 blog has "Recent Commenters" sitewide and the domain is authoritative and well crawled.

So number of blogs posted to compared to number of links in Yahoo have almost zero correlation short term.. Those start to make sense weeks down the track when all comments are indexed and the metric isn't totally screwed by having sitewide's or not. So i have no idea why you're trying to calculate those.

O no. 100% believe you. My only issue was with the 1k posted i didnt think you could. The reason i said let the competition good is check my sig

 

[flow]

Nice.. this program is essentially what I had in mind to develop but you got to it first Looks good... worth $47 just to be able to check the PR of every page on a blog.

 

[Sweetfunny]

My only issue was with the 1k posted i didnt think you could.

Trivial to do:

Drop in an additional footprint specifically targeting blogs with sitewide recent comments so your one comment/backlink is sitewide on every blog instead of just on a single blog post.

I could of boosted the Yahoo backlinks ten-fold, and indexed the domain in probably 2 hours after registration instead of 6 but i didn't do this. I literally typed in keywords like cat, fish, bird etc and indiscriminately pulled down a bunch of blogs and hit go on the commenter.

It was a very basic test, more for tuning the tools DNS Pre-Cache than backlinks.

 

[values84]

Ha. Thats more like it! Look forward to the competition

Lol
went to your site from your sig and all looks good except scrapebox does a little more.
Please correct me if I'm wrong:sombrero:

 

[naomy]

this program kick ass, the support very good, the update fast.... . I hope u can add some video tutorial and more brief guidelines for us/noob in the future, I know u would, u must be very bussy right now to make all update!

 

[ortogonk]

This thing is awesome I'm loving it!!
I have so many usages for it , no sleep for days.

 

[Mrnewbie]

Just bought it can't wait to use it : )

 

[thefandango]

For some reason, no matter what list of proxies I use now, it is not harvesting many results.

I did a search for a footprint term that I know from glancing at the SERP's should return 100's of results - but after trimming duplicates leave me with under 50. This happens with any search engine scrape. Any advice?

Also could I suggest changing the harvester with a option to move on after finding a duplicate domain - that would also help to maximise the returns on a single harvest run.

 

[naomy]

i suggest to add pause button in the poster function,cause internet speed in my country really slow, so sometimes i need to pause the poster to open browser. can't open both in the same time. only 128 kbps max sometimes down to 64 kbps when using dial up!

 

[Sweetfunny]

Mrnewbie - Thanks mate you should be right to go.

For some reason, no matter what list of proxies I use now, it is not harvesting many results.

I did a search for a footprint term that I know from glancing at the SERP's should return 100's of results - but after trimming duplicates leave me with under 50. This happens with any search engine scrape. Any advice?

Any chance your number of results setting is still on default? If you have raised this, then any chance you can send your proxy list so i can do some queries and watch in a packet monitor? My guess is they are just free proxies and occasionally timing out and ScrapeBox can't get a decent connection through them.

Also could I suggest changing the harvester with a option to move on after finding a duplicate domain - that would also help to maximise the returns on a single harvest run.

Not sure what you mean by this, ScrapeBox keeps harvesting this is why you can search site:domain.com and have the whole harvester full of the same domain.

ScrapeBox automatically filters duplicate "URL's", for example if you harvest from Google, Yahoo & Bing and the same URL ranks on all 3 engines it's added to your list once because there's not much point doubling up on it.

 

[Sweetfunny]

i suggest to add pause button in the poster function,cause internet speed in my country really slow, so sometimes i need to pause the poster to open browser. can't open both in the same time. only 128 kbps max sometimes down to 64 kbps when using dial up!

Strange nobody has ever mentioned this, and what you say shouldn't be happening. ScrapeBox uses almost no RAM/CPU when posting and can run on very low end machines, and should free up enough bandwidth to not interfere with your browsing.

I might have to go out and buy a dial-up account to test this. In the mean time, can you modify your usage a bit to compensate for your slow connection? Such as posting to smaller lists, or starting a comment run and go have lunch so your not trying to multi-task on dial-up?

 

[naomy]

ok, i will try the smaller list, actually scrape box doesn't use large cpu resources, i agree with u about this, I use dual core 2 ghz and 4 gb ram (i guess is more than enough) the problem is my internet connection really slow, so when i open browser and try to visit some sites, loading very slow, but loading better if i turn off scrape box. So basically ur scrapebox is ok, the problem is my internet connection and i need pause button to handle such thing. if u can add this pause button is good,but if u can't added is ok ,no problem with me, ur scrapebox still kick ass software. i like it and recommended to everyone!

 

[Sweetfunny]

ok, i will try the smaller list, actually scrape box doesn't use large cpu resources, i agree with u about this, I use dual core 2 ghz and 4 gb ram (i guess is more than enough) the problem is my internet connection really slow, so when i open browser and try to visit some sites, loading very slow, but loading better if i turn off scrape box. So basically ur scrapebox is ok, the problem is my internet connection and i need pause button to handle such thing. if u can add this pause button is good,but if u can't added is ok ,no problem with me, ur scrapebox still kick ass software. i like it and recommended to everyone!

Yes i understand, when i had dial-up just downloading music or a game plus trying to browse was a headache so i can imagine ScrapeBox and trying to browse is the same. ScrapeBox as you know runs on almost no RAM/CPU but it's not ideal on dial-up nor is any app like this.

Well i can't turn dial-up in to a broadband experience (i'd be rich if i could) but i will PM you an experimental build. See pause in pic: http://i38.tinypic.com/2hr3m1x.png

 

[naomy]

top support as always 10/10! buy it before he raise the price

 

[sjedwardz]

Hi - I bought it on Saturday afternoon but still not received my licence code

 

[Sweetfunny]

Hi - I bought it on Saturday afternoon but still not received my licence code

Really sorry for the delay, someone kindly ran the "Acunetix" vulnerability scanner against the online form that day and generated 17,000 emails. I "thought" i got all the legitimate ones but missed yours.

Your license is activated, and i've refunded you a 50% discount for the delay so you get ScrapeBox half price. My apologies once again.

If anyone contacts me, or activates and hasn't heard from me within several hours please don't hesitate to contact me again.. I rarely sleep.

P.S. Yes the form has flood protection now.

 

[thefandango]

Hi

What I mean is I want to find domains, ie as many as possible with the same searchable footprint - ut I jst need to find the site, not multiple URLs on it.

So say I harvest 1000 results. I click on "remove duplicate domains" and sometimes as many as 400 out of the 1000 results are removed. So I never could actually achieve 1000 unique domains in a single search - if I am using it right?

So my suggestion is that as soon as the harvester finds one URL from a domain, it ignores subesquent ones, if selected.

So for example, at the moment it finds:

site.com
site.com/example.url
site.com.another/example.url

But what I am suggesting is that:

it finds site.com
it finds site.com/example.url - say "I already have a URL from that domain" and then does not add it to the list and moves on.

So basically you will only have one URl from each domain on the harvested list without having to remove them afterwards -ie it does it as it goes.






Not sure what you mean by this, ScrapeBox keeps harvesting this is why you can search site:domain.com and have the whole harvester full of the same domain.

ScrapeBox automatically filters duplicate "URL's", for example if you harvest from Google, Yahoo & Bing and the same URL ranks on all 3 engines it's added to your list once because there's not much point doubling up on it.

 

[sjedwardz]

Thanks - all working now!!

 

[Sweetfunny]

So say I harvest 1000 results. I click on "remove duplicate domains" and sometimes as many as 400 out of the 1000 results are removed. So I never could actually achieve 1000 unique domains in a single search - if I am using it right?

So my suggestion is that as soon as the harvester finds one URL from a domain, it ignores subesquent ones, if selected.

Correct but the 1,000 result limitation per query is a limitation with Google, Yahoo & Bing not with ScrapeBox.

So it makes no difference if ScrapeBox removes duplicate domains on the fly, or you do it by pushing the "Remove Duplicate Domains" button you will always get 1,000 minus however many duplicate domains there are if all you want is unique domains. Example..

Search: test

You can harvest 1,000 URL's right, and test.com is first so in order to exclude that domain from being harvested in subsequent pages and get a full 1,000 unique domains we would have to again query

Search: test -test.com

This now performs the query again eliminating that domain so we have a full 1,000 unique domain sample to harvest from for the keyword. If there is 400 duplicate domains, this means another query with 400 -domain.com tacked on to the keyword to filter all your found ones.

A lot of work and calculations and it's not real practical. You know a certain portion will be removed if you elect to filter the list and only have unique domains.. So harvest more than you need to compensate for this, that's the best way.

Make sense now, Google allows you to harvest 1,000 URL's total so if you want to filter this down you have to expect the number to reduce.

Thanks - all working now!!

Thanks mate, and no problems.

Edit: v1.1.10 Uploaded

• Pause Button added for all posting/harvesting operations
• Export URL's & Pagerank to .xls Excel Format
• Some rewriting of Proxy Checker
• Ping Mode increased to average of 20 pings per second

Please be careful with Ping Mode, you could possibly bring down shared hosting with it (DOS) so use a delay.

 

[Gatsu]

99% of my posts fail when I use proxies.
When I dont use proxies my posts get rejected by some anti spam thing I think in wordpress.