Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter Sweetfunny
- Start date
- Status
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
This is a limitation with Google, Yahoo and Bing. If you manually search something you cannot go beyond 1,000. Example, this is a site: search for Blackhatworld who's got 90k indexed pages but you hit the end of the SERP's at 1,000
Code:
http://www.google.com/search?complete=0&hl=en&lr=&num=100&q=site:blackhatworld.com&start=900&sa=NIf it's just general URL's you are scraping you can add more keywords and variations to compensate. If you want to scrape URL's from a specific site with over 1k indexed you can make some changes to your footprint like:
site:domain.com/computers/
This will scrape URL's from just that subfolder, so you can pull down just the URL's from that category which will be less than the root domain and work around the limitation this way and grab section by section.
Also v1.0.1.1 is uploaded, Ping Mode completely rewritten and is a "lot" faster and more stable.
so is it like this : our comment - spin in other spinner program - copy the spin result and save it in our comment.txt - post to blog ? so the spinner function not built in then? @sweetfunny the remove duplicate function show above 100% if I use/ import large list, i use 100k blog list in this case but when i use smaller list like 10k, the function work ok!
Benditer
Junior Member
- Aug 13, 2009
- 123
- 37
Great tool. I have been using this for around one week and got quite a lot of backlinks in just a few tries with comment spamming. I have had more success with wordpress blogs than movable type. But thr are few gliches that if done away, will make it even better. First is inflexible GUI. I have a big screen and sometimes I want to maximize it but it doesn't, even the sub-windows are inflexible.
Apart from that, when the comment spammer fails to post the comment then I don't have any idea why it failed. I cudn't find any log anywhere. If captchas are the issue behind many failures then u sud seriously consider integrating some decaptcha service.
Inspite of some minor short comings, this tool is certailny worth more than what it is being offered for and if some body is on the fence, still not sure whether to buy it or not, then I wud ask them to go for it and they won't regret.
Apart from that, when the comment spammer fails to post the comment then I don't have any idea why it failed. I cudn't find any log anywhere. If captchas are the issue behind many failures then u sud seriously consider integrating some decaptcha service.
Inspite of some minor short comings, this tool is certailny worth more than what it is being offered for and if some body is on the fence, still not sure whether to buy it or not, then I wud ask them to go for it and they won't regret.
thefandango
Newbie
- Oct 18, 2008
- 21
- 1
I am on the verge of buying this, but wondered what the official line is on the captcha thing. Does it simply continue on when it finds a captcha? I would personally prefer URL's requiring a captcha to post to go into a seperate list that can be manually process through the software at the end if we want to.
I just started using this but am having a few problems:
1) My proxies are getting an "Error" result when ScrapeBox tests them. These proxies are from PacketFlip and are fully working - but ScrapeBox doesn't seem to like them for some reason.
2) I just tried posting to two of my own WordPress blogs so I could get to see the results. But ScrapeBox simply will not post to these blogs, it just says 'Failed' all the time. I have used other comment software to post to these blogs without problem, so I know they should be working fine. ScrapeBox will post with a 50% success rate to the blogs in the sample files.
Any suggestions on what may be going wrong?
1) My proxies are getting an "Error" result when ScrapeBox tests them. These proxies are from PacketFlip and are fully working - but ScrapeBox doesn't seem to like them for some reason.
2) I just tried posting to two of my own WordPress blogs so I could get to see the results. But ScrapeBox simply will not post to these blogs, it just says 'Failed' all the time. I have used other comment software to post to these blogs without problem, so I know they should be working fine. ScrapeBox will post with a 50% success rate to the blogs in the sample files.
Any suggestions on what may be going wrong?
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
@ Donkey, i have sent you a PM.
This is correct, you need to paste your comment complete with tokens in to your ScrapeBox Comments file. ScrapeBox does not include Power Article Rewriter, that's a $97 program and has a 37MB dictionary. To save this confusing everyone when it's really very simple, you put this in your comments file:
{hello|hi|good morning|good afternoon}
ScrapeBox will post ONE word from this on each blog post, so if you post to 400 blogs then roughly 100 will have "hello", 100 will have "hi" and so on.
With regards to your list issue, there has been no bug reports of this. However can you send me your list so i can see what's up?
This is correct, you need to paste your comment complete with tokens in to your ScrapeBox Comments file. ScrapeBox does not include Power Article Rewriter, that's a $97 program and has a 37MB dictionary. To save this confusing everyone when it's really very simple, you put this in your comments file:
{hello|hi|good morning|good afternoon}
ScrapeBox will post ONE word from this on each blog post, so if you post to 400 blogs then roughly 100 will have "hello", 100 will have "hi" and so on.
With regards to your list issue, there has been no bug reports of this. However can you send me your list so i can see what's up?
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
Thanks for your input it's much appreciated. The fixed size GUI was a lot easier, it was done at a size to suit most resolutions. Possibly in the future it will get a makeover to fit more functionality and allow expanding full screen.
Yes with Movable Type the success rate is a bit less, it's much more advanced than Wordpress in the security department. They have a comment "armor" variable embedded in the comment form with encryption in a js file to prevent posting from anything but the form itself.
ScrapeBox has bypassed this, and i believe it's the only auto poster to ever mass post to Movable Type since it was introduced. But people also add additional security and it's difficult to account for this custom stuff. But you can get some solid links from Movable Type, i struck a PR6 ******** that showed up in my backlinks from a testing run which i'd take over 100 lower quality ones from Wordpress.
So MT is there as an option, because it's less spammed it may present some good opportunities.
With showing you a reason "why" posting to a certain blog failed, this would slow down the tool dramatically and require parsing the page content to find out why. ScrapeBox hangs around long enough to know success or fail and keeps going.
ScrapeBox is like a machine gun, analyzing what happened with every bullet after letting off 10,000 rounds isn't real productive. You hit a bunch of targets and move on to the next.
Thanks mate, after it's fully refined and optimized the price will be going up as more features are added. It's only a 14 day old app, so it's still young yet. Working on a new, more reliable and faster connection method for the poster as we speak.
thefandango If it can't post to a blog due to Captcha (fails) it keep moving. Getting ScrapeBox to go back to the page, parse content to find out the exact reason would totally kill performance. Captcha is a minor annoyance you step over and keep moving when mass posting, there's millions of blog posts out there without it.
kendra I have used private proxies from Packet Flip and they work perfect. Have you got them in a format:
IP : PORT : USER : PASSWORD
No spaces. With posting, can you send me your blogs so i can check with a packet analyzer and see why this doesn't work for you.
Yes, that is the format I am using for my proxies, but it does seem to work.
I have just sent a PM with including my blogs. Thanks.
Also if you don't mind, I can PM you one of my proxies with user name and password so you could test it on your end.
I have just sent a PM with including my blogs. Thanks.
Also if you don't mind, I can PM you one of my proxies with user name and password so you could test it on your end.
Last edited:
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
I just fixed you up and you are ready to go, thanks mate.
Yes indeed it's smoking fast huh? It's doing about 20 URL's per second for me on regular ADSL and tons more stable.
Just working on migrating the comment poster to this new connection method as we speak.
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
One question more question
This is the actual page PR, if you would like just the domains PR you can click the "Trim to Root" first which will prune your list to just domain.com and run the check again.
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
No problems.
Well it's 4:30am but i just uploaded a new build, v1.1.0.0 which is a major rewrite of the comment poster using a new connection method plus DNS Pre-Cache for faster resolving/speed.
Just a tip, load the .txt file containing the blogs you want to post to first (bottom input box) "then" load the names, emails, comments and your website text files.
The reason, as soon as you load the blogs file you want to post to the DNS Pre-Cache will start running and resolving the DNS of all the blogs in advance in the background which will make it even faster so loading it first gives it a little head start..
Well it's 4:30am but i just uploaded a new build, v1.1.0.0 which is a major rewrite of the comment poster using a new connection method plus DNS Pre-Cache for faster resolving/speed.
Just a tip, load the .txt file containing the blogs you want to post to first (bottom input box) "then" load the names, emails, comments and your website text files.
The reason, as soon as you load the blogs file you want to post to the DNS Pre-Cache will start running and resolving the DNS of all the blogs in advance in the background which will make it even faster so loading it first gives it a little head start..
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
Thanks, also i'm interested in how this performs for you because it's only tested on my machine.. So your "Popping the posters cherry" so to speak.
- Status