I've read the guidelines only ads that annoy visitors like full page popunders will be wiped out, anything that passes the guidelines will be ok.native ads are no different, they will be blocked too unless they meet the NEW guidelines
anything that passes the guidelines will be ok.
It says what type of add in the guidelines, not specific companies. Worth reading to see what type of add are going to be blockedThey'll just kill every other ad networks and only allow adsense to go through.
Time to go back to firefox.
It says what type of add in the guidelines, not specific companies. Worth reading to see what type of add are going to be blocked
I read the guidelines, lots of unnecessary panic going on, it's only ads that annoy.Indeed, our analytics deeply investigated this question. The most used native ad formats such as Under Article or In-article widgets won't be affected at all. The result of the research you may find at our official blog.
being in the adult niche, this is terrible news for melol
I read the guidelines, lots of unnecessary panic going on, it's only ads that annoy.
Who likes those annoying ads anyway? Only the worst marketers would use flashing/sound ads, they should have been banned when MySpace died.
Yes I know, as I said I read it lol!It's where ads cover more than 30% of main content.
So if you have an article with only 100 words, and an ad, it might go against their terms and thus not show in Chrome.
An article of 500 words probably won't be able to show 3 ads, unless they're specifically small ads.
Yes I know, as I said I read it lol!
I wonder why they don't just address the root of the problem: why non-compliant ads are being accepted by Google in the first place. Perhaps the Chrome team has some autonomy and the Adwords team just wasn't on board.
They are trying to increase their revenues by destroying others