- Sep 23, 2009
- 6,076
- 1,708
Yes, 301 Working Good For Web 2.0.
I Also Tested !!
I Also Tested !!
[Quick Case Study] - Ranking Web 2.0 Sites using GSA and 301 Shorteners in 2017
- Thread starter moonlighsunligh
- Start date
- Jun 10, 2011
- 2,270
- 1,993
It depends on the quality of the links to be honest as well as the list initially made. Some links for me are still fighting strong. The thing is, if you've powered up the web 2.0s and 301s properly, then losing the links shouldn't have that much of an impact.
florinovic
Junior Member
- May 8, 2009
- 161
- 69
I've tested those two gigs. 0 results. period
- Jun 10, 2011
- 2,270
- 1,993
Which two?
florinovic
Junior Member
- May 8, 2009
- 161
- 69
one of yours and the other you recommend
- Jun 10, 2011
- 2,270
- 1,993
I'd need to look at the exact order to see why it didn't work. As mentioned before though, the quality of the page itself, as well as the keyword competition etc is a big factor. This was something mentioned in the thread I made in that one of the keywords with a tougher competition just wouldn't budge.
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
I did: money site <= URL SHORTENER <= GSA wikis and articles <= GSA BLAST.
maybe even something like money site <= 301 shortener <= GSA BLAST would work faster.
geneticwaste
Regular Member
- Apr 4, 2008
- 334
- 78
Update:
Now the original keyword is on #11 - #13 and in keyword finder the difficulty of the page was 20 now is 50 because the spammy links have increased the PA to 40+ and it shows 45 links poiting to the page.
So the ranking has improved significantly. But it did took several months for that without doing anything just waiting
Well, if the ranking goes from #19/22 to #11/13 within 5 months, that's most likely just normal ranking changes and not because of the links.
I track plenty of pages were I don't drop links and some increase 10-30 within months and some decrease.
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
Well other pages on this site usually loose traffic and probably rankings after a while, so this is likely not the case.