Youtube view bots

How is that real view? Sorry i am kinda clueless. Can i use it for increasing revenue?
the bot has everything needed to act like a real person, yes you can use it for increasing revenue!
 
Is this still working? Don't they ban you for this?
Recently i just used 3 min of fox news screen share in my 8 min long video as fair use and they disable my monetization for 1 month.

Isn't youtube smart enough to catch this?
I'm pretty sure you were demonetized for copyright of fox news and not the bot.
 
If your title is "how you can make lots of money from" do not put exactly the keyword on title to search instead put "how to make money" "make money" "generate money" this kind of search that a normal human being would do
So in bot it will be

Channel name :::: keyword similar in video title but exact video title or how will it be?
 
the bot has everything needed to act like a real person, yes you can use it for increasing revenue!
It for boosting videos to yt algorithm and not for earning revenue.

Any revenue you earn from proxy will be deleted by YouTube.
 
I'm pretty sure you were demonetized for copyright of fox news and not the bot.
Yes. What i meant is they are strict. Although fox news Didn't strike me they understood i was using their clip. Its not Just full copy paste of fox news video. It was under fair use.

So they have better technology than use. Don't they?
 
Yes. What i meant is they are strict. Although fox news Didn't strike me they understood i was using their clip. Its not Just full copy paste of fox news video. It was under fair use.

So they have better technology than use. Don't they?
Okay so what reason caused you to lose monetization?
 
Okay so what reason caused you to lose monetization?
As i said, fair use policy is never safe. They said i was making videos which has least effort. They want me to narrate or add extra value after using others clip. I did it but youtube thought it wasn’t enough
 
As i said, fair use policy is never safe. They said i was making videos which has least effort. They want me to narrate or add extra value after using others clip. I did it but youtube thought it wasn’t enough
Okay, so using bot to manipulate views or earnings wasn't the issue
 
It for boosting videos to yt algorithm and not for earning revenue.

Any revenue you earn from proxy will be deleted by YouTube.
If you use free proxies online that is red flagged on google's / youtube's ip red flag list or something, yes you will lose view counts hence ads rev, if you use paid proxy it will be slightly harder for them to detect with the bot's configuration it's doing a pretty good job being "human" to find videos by scrolling and filtering.
Depending on your use case, if you are trying to get the monetization enabled watch hours are needed if you hit 1k sub, if you are already enabled, you might want to use this to boost and possibly get recommended by youtube and earn ad rev from it and possible organic views from your niche.
 
If you use free proxies online that is red flagged on google's / youtube's ip red flag list or something, yes you will lose view counts hence ads rev, if you use paid proxy it will be slightly harder for them to detect with the bot's configuration it's doing a pretty good job being "human" to find videos by scrolling and filtering.
Depending on your use case, if you are trying to get the monetization enabled watch hours are needed if you hit 1k sub, if you are already enabled, you might want to use this to boost and possibly get recommended by youtube and earn ad rev from it and possible organic views from your niche.
Well I have 2 monetized channel I'm using the bot on... Currently getting suggested, youtube search and few browse feature views.

If you don't mind, can you recommend a good paid unlimited bandwidth proxy?

I tested webshare datacenter proxy, gonna wait few days to see if it stick or not.

My main goal is to make algorithm push my monetized videos to real audience and not to earn from the botted views.
 
Well I have 2 monetized channel I'm using the bot on... Currently getting suggested, youtube search and few browse feature views.

If you don't mind, can you recommend a good paid unlimited bandwidth proxy?
i honestly would just look around the proxys for sale forum and look for DC rotating proxys, some plans can go for 50$ a month and have limited data etc, some limit the amount of threads you can use (stormproxies cough cough) meaning if they limit the threads to 10, to them 1 BROWSER means 10 threads! i learnt this the hard way... also 4g proxys are what EVERYONE suggests for everything nowdays, waterproxy on this forum has an AMAZING service that ive trialed and its worth the asking price!
 
i honestly would just look around the proxys for sale forum and look for DC rotating proxys, some plans can go for 50$ a month and have limited data etc, some limit the amount of threads you can use (stormproxies cough cough) meaning if they limit the threads to 10, to them 1 BROWSER means 10 threads! i learnt this the hard way... also 4g proxys are what EVERYONE suggests for everything nowdays, waterproxy on this forum has an AMAZING service that ive trialed and its worth the asking price!
So DC rotating proxy gotcha.
 
I've always been interested in generating YouTube views, and something strikes me about using a single IP address, not using proxies.

For example,.in a restaurant, single IP comes in to the broadband router and is shared through the restaurant, all customers watch the same video from the same ip address, and how is YouTube supposed to tell if if they are real devices, they only way to do this is through device ID. At you tube, they must also be recognising types of devices.

So surely in order to make the views go up, different devices must also be used, not just Google Chrome.

Another scenario, in a school, where they teach IT to kids,.in that department, same ip , and also all the kids have exactly the same computer and same chrome, they watch a School video hosted on you tube, and the views increase, now this situation has same ip, same computer, same chrome, but the views go up.

Your thoughts.

I think u can use the same ip to a degree.
 
I think u can use the same ip to a degree.
All big sites don't rely on IP to detect unique user for a long time, they use browser fingerprinting (as described in this article). You have so many unique factors:
https://amiunique.org/fpthat you can easily detect if thats the same browser, even if you rotate the IP.

You can use the same IP to some degree, not also because what you said, but also all mobile providers use CGNAT and behind single public IP you have maaany customers (thats quite easy to estimate if you know how many mobile subscribers mobile provider have and how big IP subnets they have). That's also an advantage of mobile proxies, because social media sites can't be as strict as for example residental IPs where single IP is usually in fact single client.
But that doesn't mean you can run hundreds of "actions" (ie views) of the same video from single mobile IP at the same time.

Regarding this specific github project. I checked it and in fact views are being added (for now), but the code itself is not that good.. it's easily detected by for example cloudflare bot detection, you can check it on this website:
https://nowsecure.nl/and I'm pretty sure that youtube have at least as good bot detection as cloudflare.
 
All big sites don't rely on IP to detect unique user for a long time, they use browser fingerprinting (as described in this article). You have so many unique factors:
https://amiunique.org/fpthat you can easily detect if thats the same browser, even if you rotate the IP.

You can use the same IP to some degree, not also because what you said, but also all mobile providers use CGNAT and behind single public IP you have maaany customers (thats quite easy to estimate if you know how many mobile subscribers mobile provider have and how big IP subnets they have). That's also an advantage of mobile proxies, because social media sites can't be as strict as for example residental IPs where single IP is usually in fact single client.
But that doesn't mean you can run hundreds of "actions" (ie views) of the same video from single mobile IP at the same time.

Regarding this specific github project. I checked it and in fact views are being added (for now), but the code itself is not that good.. it's easily detected by for example cloudflare bot detection, you can check it on this website:
https://nowsecure.nl/and I'm pretty sure that youtube have at least as good bot detection as cloudflare.
Yes good point, so it basically means that if the device detection can be improved and varied a whole lot more, in theory u should be able to get a lot more views per IP addresses. Something that is probably noted is the html5 unique fingerprint ID.

On Chrome there is an add-on that can fake the html5 fingerprint, but as far as I am aware selenium won't run add-on's
 
Back
Top