"you don't need links to get PR"

Whoever said that should reconsider his ability to make money online.
 
I disagree on some of the comments above. I have an site built with quality contents and left it unlink, not even a link was done nor added the site to any SEs. After 6 mths or so, it got a PR1. So here with proven example, I beloeve you do not need links to get PR. But I agreed linking with authority high PR sites can increase PR rapidly.
Trust me dude, no links = no PR. Plus not all link checkers are accurate. If you have PR, you must have some links pointing to your site somewhere. Whether you built them or not.
 
who cares about pr? my biggest earners have pr0 and pr1
 
I have some sites with like 2 backlinks and even from the same IP with already a PR of 3 for more then 2 years now.

C@MEL
 
Someone said this in another thread. Is this true? I've never seen a site with legit PR that didn't have good links.

It's true.

If Google's bots discover a page, even if the page has no incoming links, Google assigns the page a minimal Pagerank. This PR is different from the toolbar PR that we generally refer to. Such a page will have 0 toolbar PR - nothing more than that.

The whole PR system is based on reiterations. If pages don't have a minimum default PR, the PR of all pages will be 0, no matter how they are interlinked.
 
backlinks-chart.jpg


Backlinks are pretty much essential to any website with a Page-Ranking.


That chart is ancient, here's some proof:

http://www.bontb.com/2007/12/how-to-get-backlinks-you-need-for-better-google-pr/
 
You are not right dude. Even if you can't see a backlink, doesn't mean that there isn't any. Check with a different backlink checker such as ahref which gives you more or less accurate result.
I disagree on some of the comments above. I have an site built with quality contents and left it unlink, not even a link was done nor added the site to any SEs. After 6 mths or so, it got a PR1. So here with proven example, I beloeve you do not need links to get PR. But I agreed linking with authority high PR sites can increase PR rapidly.
 
You are not right dude. Even if you can't see a backlink, doesn't mean that there isn't any. Check with a different backlink checker such as ahref which gives you more or less accurate result.

Ye but I dont think backlinks are always needed for a PR as little as 1... That isnt that difficult.

nice thread...

Nice post count spam.
 
If you are now and wow you could get a temporary rank at the top but without links your stay will be short-lived.
 
Nop. I dont think so, You gonna need higher pr links to get your site a PR.
 
Well I am not too sure about that. Can you show me an example? :)
Ye but I dont think backlinks are always needed for a PR as little as 1... That isnt that difficult.
 
No tool shows the accurate actual no of links to your site.
Many links are discarded or don't show up.
To have any PR you HAVE to have links, whether this will remain true in future only google knows.
 
Links are not the only thing that calculates pr now.
If you have legit traffic, social presence, quality content, and etc then your sites pr can go up even with very little backlinks.
 
Dammit BHW another worthless thread grown to epic proportions!

Final answer is as follows:

No Backlinks = No PR


Soooooo lets say you don't agree with this, and you can earn PR with only "quality contents and social signals" blah blah, who the F$*@ cares?

The PR of your site has nothing to do with how well you rank.

Furthermore the only time PR matters is when you are trying to sell a site or sell some links.

However those of you with this "magic PR" that seems to appear out of nowhere, won't be able to do benefit from this, because apparently the "backlinks don't exist", so nobody will buy your site or links from you anyway.

So there is no point to this thread.
 
Back
Top