Will purchasing multiple link building packages do more damage than good?

There are a handful of link building packages on here I'd like to try. Want to go with top notch high quality ones, and I'm considering purchasing a few services - will this look bad to google? Will it be to many link pointing at me all at once that will trigger a penalty?

BrotherSlug said:

Will it be to many link pointing at me all at once that will trigger a penalty?

Click to expand...

Yes. You have to gradually and steady build your backlinks if you want to stay safe.

Try to keep the link building looking as natural as possible.
If you have a fuckload of links coming in all the the same time it's gonna raise some red flags.

Thank you guys!

The slower you build links, the more effective they will be. Keep that in mind.

Do not buy all at once, go gradually. Wait for the links to get counted and see some results before pushing the other ones.

Make sure you are getting links with highly relevant context and they should be diversified as well.

Nothing wrong in buying multiple package, but not at a time. This looks suspicious to google. So, try to avoid these kind of risky practice. In SEO natural link building is the best, safest among the most efficient ways to promote your site.

Be very careful when building your own or purchasing links, lately Google has been devaluing/penalizing links built very quickly.

Its Nothing Wrong buying more links but make sure that all links are not getting live at the same day or time and also kindly check quality of link you going to buy,because these may affect your site. the best way to avoid is Drip feed, make sure that you inform this to your Backlinks providers All the best Brother

I've had great results on a couple of new sites using @DX-GENERATION service.
One brand site new in March is now ranking 871 keywords.

If you are building links too fast that won't do any good and that will likely trigger a penalty.

As other said, you should focus on the quality of links rather than the quantity. Content plays an important role, focus more on getting backlinks with high quality write-ups posted on relevant blogs.

If your building links are from the high quality sites and as natural as possible then there is no issues.

quantity - not danger, quality - is it.

Will it trigger a penalty?
Absolutely yes unless you can emulate a virality factor, which is what most churn & burn tactics are all about. But your site will fall from the SERP-s pretty soon anyway even if you successfully do that. In order to avoid that, you need HUGE authority, which you can get in 2 ways:

1) Leech it from already authoritative sites that allow you to post in there or create a blog - basically what Tommy's famous thread is all about. Worked wonders in the past, still works, but the ROI is not as good anymore unless you are targeting high competition keywords with min. $1k+/day profit. You also need a shit ton of links and especially you need to know what you are doing!
2) Build it yourself - takes A LOT of time and money, worth it only if you build a brand and a community, not if you launch a quick affiliate site.

It's also worth saying that the virality factor is best suited for fresh news and articles that are time sensitive. Evergreen niches are completely different. In fact, the older a page with evergreen content becomes, the more authority it gets over time (generally of course, there are exceptions and depends on what you are doing). So, to answer your question, if it's a site you care about in the long-term with evergreen content, do NOT do it, you will get a penalty sooner or later especially since 90% of the spam links you buy from packages here are worthless. Instead, pay for $XX guest post links - 5 links of those are worth more (and will produce more results in terms of higher rankings) than 5k links made with GSA/SB/any other automated tool.

Buying backlinks in bulk will be considered by Google as some suspicious activity. This action can cause penalty. If you do your link building company gradually it will do no harm.