RankWithShelly
Elite Member
- May 4, 2010
- 1,503
- 314
Okay, before we get to out of line here, comparing a weather related catastrophe to the rape/genocide situation isn't even a real comparison.
Choose your words carefully or STFU.
True. But continuing to judge a country on the actions of dictatorial government that was overthrown over a decade ago also isn't a real comparison. It's just being close minded. Which is fine if that's what you want to be but then you should also realize that your opinion is not valuable because it's not current. Making a lasting decision based on experiences during an extreme situation isn't generally a good idea.
Let's do a more apples to apples comparison. You've been to Korea and SE Asia. Would you suggest that people avoid them? If not, why not? They were both countries/regions at war where various atrocities were committed.
If your position is that people shouldn't visit countries that have a dirty political/military history then I assume you tell people to avoid the US right? Because the genocide committed here is just as real as the one in the Balkans - it just happened longer ago.
Or is there a time limit when genocide, rape and other war time atrocities no longer matter? If not, how can you go anywhere because virtually every country on the planet has been involved in one conflict or another in which people were brutally abused and killed.
Or, perhaps countries CAN change and therefore travel to the US, Korea, SE Asia and other countries is ok in your opinion because you didn't witness it?
Don't get me wrong, you're allowed your opinions, I'm just trying to understand your reasoning because it seems that some countries that commit atrocities are ok but others aren't...