When do you think keyword anchor text will be entirely dead?

A lot of good answers here.
I personally feel that while it's been part of the algorithmic process for a very long time, there is no reason to assume it will stay part of the algorithm when it comes to ranking sites as factors like co-citation and co-occurrences become more the normal for relevancy determination. I feel that eventually it will be complete pointless, exact or otherwise, and hyperlinked text will no longer be any part of the basis to rank something and content revolving that hyperlink will instead be the basis for determining if the link is relevant to a subject along with page information.
 
I'll stop using anchor keywords when Matt will stop, not before.
Just look at his blog, he goes wild with anchor tests - it obviously reflects his idea of perfect web.
 
I know. I am referring to the future. Based on the direction google is headed right now, exact match anchors are become stronger than they ever were. They are becoming harder to implement safely (I don't dispute this at all), but their power/effectiveness does not seem like it's going anywhere based on the current trend/action of google. That is what I'm trying to say. As it stands, exact match anchors work now, and will continue to work in the future (for those that know how to use it).

This raises the question: how do we use it correctly (besides having a low % of them)?
 
Back
Top