Web 2.0 Question

Web2.0s makes your linkbuilding strategy less risky although tier 3 links rapidly ranks a site but its like a bubble to prevent it make pyramid before starting your strategy in the fist tier make only white hate natural links like HA guest posts with few quality web2.0 not spun well written article, 2nd tier: make manually maded blog comments backlinks with diversified niche, general niche nofollow ******** as high da pa as possible, social bookmarking, article submissions (spun content) is ok here if it from paid spinner, 3rd tier make GSA ser links blast with hundrds of all type of quality links comment article profile all mix but in 3rd tier never target your main money site direct, target web2.0, and sit on the back the rank game just begins.
 
Web2.0s makes your linkbuilding strategy less risky although tier 3 links rapidly ranks a site but its like a bubble to prevent it make pyramid before starting your strategy in the fist tier make only white hate natural links like HA guest posts with few quality web2.0 not spun well written article, 2nd tier: make manually maded blog comments backlinks with diversified niche, general niche nofollow ******** as high da pa as possible, social bookmarking, article submissions (spun content) is ok here if it from paid spinner, 3rd tier make GSA ser links blast with hundrds of all type of quality links comment article profile all mix but in 3rd tier never target your main money site direct, target web2.0, and sit on the back the rank game just begins.
Sweet baby Jesus, I tried to read this...

OP: no web2s aren't required.
 
Web 2.0 is not neccessary but they good with low budget & safe also that's why people suggest web 2.0
 
a proper web 2.0 can increase indexing postion ....

web 2.0 are one of the best links you can ever have for a backlink .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psh
Sir i ranked my blog trying this even my 1 page has tf 62 now :)
TF 62 is meaningless.
BUT it wasn't about the classic "tiered linking" it was literally about what you wrote being incomprehensible, you jumped straight from web2 to rambling about tier 3, without explaining your strategy for tier 1 or 2, just rambled on about tier 3.
 
TF 62 is meaningless.
BUT it wasn't about the classic "tiered linking" it was literally about what you wrote being incomprehensible, you jumped straight from web2 to rambling about tier 3, without explaining your strategy for tier 1 or 2, just rambled on about tier 3.

i also remember having effects from pumped webs 2.0. but its hard to make them without expensive tools
 
I've got another question. Is a PBN important and if yes can you suggest some good sellers?
 
It all depends on competition.

I use web 2.0s for high comp terms to dilute anchor text.

I use web 2.0s on long term sites like a pbn for diversity.

For very low comp key words or niches, i use them because they are cheaper than a pbn.

For mid comp, i will use web 2.0s as a buffer for pbn and sape links.

I also use web 2.0s when using most services (bhw and else where) for protection.

You do not need web 2.0s. Pbn links and guest posts work fine. But it depends how much money you want to invest and the risk you want.
 
It all depends on competition.

I use web 2.0s for high comp terms to dilute anchor text.

I use web 2.0s on long term sites like a pbn for diversity.

For very low comp key words or niches, i use them because they are cheaper than a pbn.

For mid comp, i will use web 2.0s as a buffer for pbn and sape links.

I also use web 2.0s when using most services (bhw and else where) for protection.

You do not need web 2.0s. Pbn links and guest posts work fine. But it depends how much money you want to invest and the risk you want.

GOD DAMN FXXXX

you are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I checked your profile many many times and wait u back, no idea where u gone for this long time, but hope everything good on your side! So exciting to see u back, u contribute too much to this forum.

Btw, any plan to release a new version of "a dollar and a dream 2018 version"

We are all looking forward!!!!!!!!!!!

terry
 
GOD DAMN FXXXX

you are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I checked your profile many many times and wait u back, no idea where u gone for this long time, but hope everything good on your side! So exciting to see u back, u contribute too much to this forum.

Btw, any plan to release a new version of "a dollar and a dream 2018 version"

We are all looking forward!!!!!!!!!!!

terry

Hey Terry!

Dolla' and a Dream does not have a planned sequal. I am not going after lower comp keywords or parasites as much now so I dont have the knowledge now to make a new cheap ranking thread.

I can test some, but dont like to post about what I know nothing about.

Plus, I have seen a lot of threads using the same methodology (web 2.0s and url shorteners as a base) recently. I think we all have it covered!
 
rank your website follow easy steps

step:1 use this index tool https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-url/
step : 2 doing niche blog comments with unique 50 words text
step : 3 doing wiki links and social bookmarking
step : 4 50 PBN Post with unique content /
step : 5 web 2.0 and blog comments

if you want this service in responsible price pm and contact me on sky : ajlalzai
 
Web 2.0 are not necessary, but they can help a lot if done right. Many people use them for link diversification to PBN for example, or a buffer site to build tiered backlinks to, or rank them on their own and send visitors to your site. Few years ago web 2.0 had more influence on ranking but at more recent times I've personally used it to diversify link profile and mix it up with my PBN links. Another challenge with web 2.0 is that they get deleted by moderators, so if you register them manually and add readable content, you can be sure they last longer compared to blasting spun text with automatic bots.
 
web 2.0 is not required if you are not interested on it. Honestly web 2.0 is not a white hat seo practice. It's basically gray hat. But this method can boost your site a lot if you make the proper use of it
 
Back
Top