I had created a revised version of this guide and posted it here. The whole things wasn't really new, it only contained some improvements and some additional hints to make it easier for people trying it.
And guess what happened: Someone blamed me that I was spamming this forum to get more ref signups, reported the thread and it got deleted. Great thing. Really.
Reinstecker, I`ve a question. I red and followed 2 threads from you, the first one is from 01-11-2013 here
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...-automated-wordpress-blog-earning-system.html
and this updated thread beginning on 09-05-2013 with a lot of additional good ideas (the rss-feeds from own blogs, own porno-tube etc.).
I can see both threads, no one is deleted. So I`m confused, I think this one is the updated thread ?
Or did you make another new thread with updates ? (newer than this one) ?
Than I missed this thread completely, never seen it ...
If this is right,
does anybody has saved this thread and can give me a copy please ?
I`ve learned a lot from your 2 threads, thank you. And if there`s another update, I`m very interested in reading it.
About the ref-links, I don`t understand the reason for deleting the thread. First of all, in both threads you gave the links in 2 versions (without ref-link and with). So everybody could decide, if he wants to use the ref-links or not. So this is only a possibility, no one is forced to use the ref-links.
And your recommendations make sense, I`ve used arvixe and that was a good decision.
And, this is one of the best detailed and spoon - feed and always answering questions and helping with problems method thread I`ve red here.
And it`s a method which works. And you give updates.
I`ve red a lot of other method threads, which are worse. They had also ref-links.
So why can`t this realy good one have ref-links ? I don`t understand the decision.
Whatsoever, I`m happy to read your updates (and additions from other people also) in a new thread. I don`t care if it has ref-links or not, I`m interested in upscaling this method.