Right, because the sites that have obscured their footprint survived... oh wait... no, every single site was hit that was SEO'd seriously for any period of time.
So every single site on the entire internet that was "
SEO'd seriously" for any period of time has been hit? Okay, sure... I'd be interested to see your proof of this claim and possibly some statistics to back it up.
I'm not into the whole "Google is killing us" thought process. We're all on the same side here. Lets use all our huge resource of info to work this out.
I'm pointing out some factors that can be analysed, something has clearly changed, and the ones who will win will be the ones who analyse
what this change is. Not the ones that shout from the rooftops and claim everything that has been SEO'd is hit and Google are bad. This is a thought process of a quitter. I've been watching sites that have gone up in rank in a big way, and some have gone down.
Yes Google are annoying us by taking away what works for us now, but the key is to find out what works next, isn't that the essence of BlackhatSEO, staying one step ahead of Google?
Everyone that has any knowledge about the internet knows backlinks help in ranking, and I'm sure Google dislike this! They're going to try and obscure signs of ranking, and what works to get you ranking organically. Why? This is their "bread and butter". Why pay $5 a day on AdWords when you can get a SB blast on Fiverr and rank organically #1?!
This is screwing Google, and they're obviously going to do something about it. Google want more people to use AdWords, this is their business! They want to cut all this SEO and manipulation of the SERPS out!
Factors we can safely say are:
It's not 100% manual SERP editing
It's not "voodoo" where it's just "happened" (although some people may believe this).
The FB pages ranking highly point towards Likes playing a more of a major role in Rankings, my belief is Social is a factor that is getting much stronger traction in the Google algorithm (G+'s are helping massively now too)
I am not trying to annoy anyone with this post, rather, work as a team to come to a decent solution. We can all say what we did with the sites that were punished.
I had a site that got hit and I was using a link-pushing service, I had a webmasters email as consequence of this. It was link-pushing to the money site.
I have other authority sites that have improved. I used buffer sites in these instances.
I say we weed out the offending "strategies" as a group, and see what's harmed people. The resource of info and webmaster knowledge here is phenomenal, we should use this to our advantage.