ScrapeBox - Fast vs Slow Poster! Is slow worth the time ?

pisco

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
222
Reaction score
44
Well the question is pretty straightforward, taking into account posting in the thousands of url's, is the slow method really worth it regarding time consumed ?

For instants, I harvested 10k urls, cleaned dups, run the link checker, and the blog analyser, was left with 8k, fast poster with these using 90 timeout time and for connections use 20% of the proxy number (100proxy = 20 conn).

Manage to post sucessfully 4k in about 2h (maybe less), other 4k failed, scraped new proxies and went for slow, and it will take surely more than 24h at a success rate of +- 50% (atm), so I will gain maybe more 2k posted, but will waste 24h.

My gut feeling tells me it's really not worth it, unless you really find it crucial to post the best % ever (no matter what).

What are you big scrapers doing ? This seems to only make sense in High PR blogs, and very small lists, on the other hands these smalls lists maybe would benefit more by posting manually.

Sometimes I rinse and repeat the fast poster twice, more than that seems to yield little to no benefit, but i still feel the urge to waste days using the slow poster after this.
 
I've been testing out the slow poster and fast poster out lately and I think it is not worth it. I would need to run the slow poster for hours posting to a list that had about 2k links. I think it took me something like 15 hours using slow poster, and my success ratio hadn't gone up by that much.

I still stick to fast poster, it gets way more done in a shorter amount of time. It probably fails a handful more times than the slow poster.

I found that my success ratio with slow poster compared to fast poster didnt make too much difference.
 
I never use the slow poster. I always run the fast poster and make an extra run with the failed posts. Often with an extra result of +10%
 
I set up the same test a few weeks ago and had the same results, just go with the fast poster for now.
 
Slow poster doesn't have worth unless the blogs are high quality or you use a small list.

But in that case you might as well post manually.
 
Fast Poster only for me - have used the slow poster previously, but unless you have server resources to burn and a nice fat pipe and a high PR list then IMO its not worth it.
 
I never use the slow poster. I always run the fast poster and make an extra run with the failed posts. Often with an extra result of +10%
 
For me Fast poster is best. If you have decent server and 50+ private proxies then it can blast 400k list in 2.5 hours.
 
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock