Well the question is pretty straightforward, taking into account posting in the thousands of url's, is the slow method really worth it regarding time consumed ? For instants, I harvested 10k urls, cleaned dups, run the link checker, and the blog analyser, was left with 8k, fast poster with these using 90 timeout time and for connections use 20% of the proxy number (100proxy = 20 conn). Manage to post sucessfully 4k in about 2h (maybe less), other 4k failed, scraped new proxies and went for slow, and it will take surely more than 24h at a success rate of +- 50% (atm), so I will gain maybe more 2k posted, but will waste 24h. My gut feeling tells me it's really not worth it, unless you really find it crucial to post the best % ever (no matter what). What are you big scrapers doing ? This seems to only make sense in High PR blogs, and very small lists, on the other hands these smalls lists maybe would benefit more by posting manually. Sometimes I rinse and repeat the fast poster twice, more than that seems to yield little to no benefit, but i still feel the urge to waste days using the slow poster after this.