Nothing personal, you have been here for years and don't know the rules. Your negative rep says it all. I think you should work on that and increase your post count with meaningful post. While am in support of removing the restrictions to reply to PM but not to send new PMs. This is done to check mate spammers. Giving you a rep for been here for years and for my believe that little post means little vulnerability.
Nothing personal, but your text above seems to be confusing.....eg I do not understand these:
"my believe that little post means little vulnerability."
"This is done to check mate spammers"
"Giving you a rep for been here for years"
What are you trying to say, you have repped him for being here for years?
or you have neg repped him for not posting so much and being a more worthwhile contributor for all this time?
May I remind you that many bona fide members here actually spend time reading and implementing methods,
and do not (for whatever reason) post that much, until and unless they wish to do so?
No one is forced into posting or making contributions, it is up to the individual,
of course being more active does help the dynamics of the forum,
but he/she should not be penalised just by being relatively inactive;
.....as for opening threads such as this? ... well this entirely another matter altogether

(after all it is a bit like the tail wagging the dog)
I would MUCH rather see members here participate more, but
IMHO, it would be better that a member remains in good standing,
and only posting when THEY feel the need for it, and feel that they wish to contribute in the future....
better that than posting some garbage which has been discussed many times before, or
even just posting stuff to eventually lead them to attempting to scam or spam.
I hope
you understand what I mean in this post? Cheers