Please Share working case with RankerX and GSA..

Shaunm said:

I have a small number of pages with SEREngines on T2 none have a T3 but the majority of them just have a T1 but theres a bunch of additional variables like keyword difficulty, your onpage andPBN/BN usage.

Click to expand...

masta2133 said:

Ok and how many PBNs links do you have so far to the pages ranking in the first page? I want to have a global idea on what is involved. Thanks in advance.

Click to expand...

Shaunm said:

Only the middle set of analytic screenshots have PBN links, the bottom ones don't have any. There are variables with the PBNs too, such as auctions/scraped domain and homepage link/internal link so its hard to give an exact answer.

I chose two of the pages at random, one has 9 home page PBN links, 5 from auction domains, 4 from scraped. The other page is a harder keyword and has 12 home page links and 9 internal links from 11 auction domains and 10 scraped domains, both have 10 manual do follow web 2.0s pointed at them to. The second one could be over kill as I built all the links within about a month rather than spanning it out over a longer period as it may have ranked with less links.

I have bridge network based pages on the front page with as little as 10 internal bridge network links and 10 manual do follow web 2.0s though.

Click to expand...

br4sco said:

If i may ask, the PBNs point directly to the moneypages or at the web2.0?

Click to expand...

masta2133 said:

Can you explain the bridge network ?

Maybe a little chart will help see the links pointing to your money pages. You could insert the different links used there so that to get a better idea of the structure.

Click to expand...

Shaunm said:

Directly to the money pages.



This thread on the GSA forum has a bunch of stuff about it. Think of it as a bunch of money sites with decent content but instead of being there to earn money, they are there to have some of their internal pages link to my money pages.

Click to expand...

masta2133 said:

Read it thanks. I understand now the concept of bridge pages. Basically you get less juice but it is also less risky.

Can you please point out how many pages and approx word count do the sites that are generating revenue have? Also, do you have only money pages on these sites or do you also have filler content that contain no links and that may help your site look more legit to search engines?

Thank you.

Click to expand...

Second Site​

​

​

​

Shaunm said:

I know its not exactly what you asked for but here are some of my observations over the past 6-8 month using SER and a few other things.

Out of the IMers I have on my Skype, I was the last to use SER on my sites and it was working ok until last year, I don't know anyone sucessfully using SER to rank sites now with most people having moved onto PBNs, Outreach or Paid Traffic. IMO Penguin 4 going real time has added something into the algo that totally turns link juice off from domains that go offline a whole bunch like the majority of the ones SER posts to.

In addition to this, it seems auto generated content has taken a hit too. I'm not sure if this is due to rank brain developing over time, penguin 4, Fred or something else but my money pages using auto generated content in their tiers have either not moved or fallen over time compared to those using 100% human wrote content climbing with a small number having not moved. If you are paying $2.5 for a T1 article then theres no point using SER to post it to a domain you don't have 100% control over as it can get deleted by the web master, the domain can be rolled back to before it was posted, the domain can get deindexed, the domain can go offline totally or it can go offline sparadically due to increased bandwidth requirements from people posting to it using automation.

Although my SER use has been minimal on sites for a few month with a focus more on the bridge network concept rather than mass automation, I decided to totally drop the tool early last month having dropped the mass automation side of it a few month before that. I still think building out bridge networks has potential, and you can use SER to post to self hosted domains but Scrapebox has the ability to add media to your posts and host it on your own sites as well as post your content in the correct category making it much easier to make your bridge network/PBN domains look legit.

Although I have been deleting my rank tracker/analytic projects for my SER based stuff over the past few month as I give up on the domain, here are some screenshots of the rank tracker data for the three I still have, the deleted ones looked the same...

SER on Three Tiers, Auto-Generated Content.​

Manual Web 2.0, PBN, Bridge Network - 100% unique human wrote content.
​

Manual Web 2.0, Bridge Network - 100% unique human wrote content.​

Some of my PBN, BN, Manual web 2 domains do have SER on the T1 with a select set of engines to try an help with anchor diversification and increasing the referring domains to my pages but most of those links are already dead so I have no current plans to go back to doing that.

Click to expand...

homeriscool said:

So correct me if im wrong here....but basically are you saying web 2.0 PBN still work for SEO but not using auto generated content?

Click to expand...

Shaunm said:

In my experience they do yea.

Click to expand...

homeriscool said:

without firing gsa spam at them?

What do you do instead? manually build links to them?

Click to expand...

Shaunm said:

Nothing, a small number of some SERE T2 links with human spun content to them but most are just T1 with human wrote content on them, the bridge network seems to come into play though, the below screenshot took around three weeks to get to the front page with a bridge network blast and ******** manual web 2.0s, quickest I have ever managed to get a money page to the front page for its keyword.

Click to expand...

homeriscool said:

ok so what is a bridge network? im a little lost....so its not the web 2.0 pbn thats ranking your site? is a bridge something else?

Click to expand...

Shaunm said:

Saw last post by "Ignored Member" and knew it would be you trying to make yourself feel better/important/relevant while adding nothing of value .

In all honesty, you come across as the type of person who's Mother sends him to the supermarket for their monthly food shopping but instead of coming back with the shopping or the money, you return with a massive beaming smile on you face and three "Magic Beans" that some homeless guy managed to scam you for in exchange for the whole shopping budget. To top it off you then get angry at your Mother for not understanding that the homeless guy who sold them to you super double no take backs promised you that you were the one getting the good deal.

Anyway, heres a few things I took note of before putting you on my ignored list on the off chance I needed them.

To answer your question, I'm still black hat and far from giving up, just adapting to the times. I recently completed my testing to see what has an effect on the SERPs after the crazy three months either side of the new year that wiped out many peoples sites and I am planing to start scaling in January. I tent to try a whole bunch of stuff and then build positive feedback loops to develop what worked for me rather than crying like a bitch because I tried once and it didn't go my way or trying something on such a small scale you have little to no chance of getting any valuable data from it (and then thinking its a case study...).

In all honesty, judging by your post here it seems like you just want some magic zero effort push button solution. Myself and others (just one example of someone else using it) were successfully using SER on money sites last year after a bunch of stuff had been released by Google to counter it, if you were unable to make an ROI way back in 2012 before Google had rolled out counters then its most definitely on you, not the tool.

If we do some quick math on your post here.

Income = €33,000
Duration = 2008-2017 = 9 years
€33,000/9 years = €3666 per YEAR.

You confirm in your post here that you were working IT based jobs at the same time period so i'm calling bullshit on any claims you try to make of having other more successful sites.

If the two successful test sites from my testing phase stay at their current performance level rather than growing further as I expect, then they are still on track to earn almost double per year than your site. These are just test sites, they were built to test a whole bunch of stuff on them, not focus on maximising income. They are actually two of the sites you tried to call out here then refused to reply to me when I responded to you .

Judging by the type of posts I have seen you make and this massive waste of time, money and effort I kind of pity and feel sorry for you as you just come off as an angry person that has little to no happiness in your life other than failing at being a troll .

Click to expand...

masta2133 said:

100k words which equals around at $20 per 1000 words equals $2000 for the content of a single site.

Can you please tell us more about the investment involved? I would like to have an idea about the ROI. But cost is enough for me.

Click to expand...

masta2133 said:

That's a good price especially if quality is there. Where do you find your writers?

Click to expand...