guaranteedseo
Regular Member
- Feb 19, 2009
- 358
- 31
All PMs replied to.
So far content is king package got my brand new site up to top 3 position on Google within two weeksTHANK YOU!
Designsonline -
All of our blogs are PR5. They are absolutely not PR0. Just like any blog, they eventually drop off the front page which is PR5, to the deeper pages.
Further more, after checking my new indexxr program, I find that 12 Have been indexed already out of the 15 - Why would you say 4?
I never lied - that's not my style, but for you to sit here and say that I conned you is a big freaking deal. I'll send you the report of all the indexed links, and you can see for your self. Further more, WE JUST FINISHED YOUR PROJECT 4 DAYS AGO. WE BOTH know that it takes at least 1 week to 2 weeks for any SERP increase.
This was tried/tested/research before launching. We had very good SERP increases through testing, even on major keywords. Next time, contact us through PM before you make these alleged findings, when they were absolutely wrong.
Hi we used scrapebox to test the 15 properties that you sent us to see if they were indexed in Google.
Scrapebox tells me that 4 of the properties are indexed in Google. it told me that 11 are indexed in Yahoo, but as it is Google that everyone is interested in, (or should I say in this case as the customer, it is Google that I am interested in seeing serp improvements in) I quoted the Google indexed details.
Secondly you called this a "PR5 M-Net" so I dont think given the astronimical price, and the name, that expecting the links to be on PR5 pages was unreasonable. However it turns out that what we actually get is a PR0 page with our links on it. The fact that you own the blogs and the root domains are PR5 doesnt really benefit me sufficiently enough.
Your graphic diagram (as posted on other forums) that you sent me the link to by email, shows all the 15 links as being PR5. They are not, all the links are on PR0 pages.
This is why I am upset, When you put together the :
1) misleading name "PR5 M-Net"
2) misleading diagram showing 15 PR5 links pointing to our main website
3) the VERY expensive price for a rehash of a 15 spoke linkwheel, which would only be justified if the actual properties the links are on were PR5.
Then to find that what you have got for the money is just 15 PR0 blog entries, it is not really supprising that I am not happy is it.
I suspect that like me most people reading about your new "PR5 M-Net" expect that they will get 15 PR5 links back to their website and that will will really boost their keyword positions in the serps.
I think you need to explain what you are offering for the money more clearly.
And if you are offering refunds to those who did not get this explained clearly and were mislead by your advertising and diagramm then yes I would like one please.