You want to hear something funny, In my google webmaster account, google says there are two websites linking to me and they are woorank.com and seoupgrader.com. Both these sites are seo evaluation services and these sites do not have links to my site. Is Google trying to tell me something!?!
I think you still may be there somewhere, or most likely you were there at some point and not there now, they just haven't been updated by their bots just yet. I still have links that are showing, where I am not there.
I don't think you understand what I was saying. Those two sites I mentioned are 100% not linking to me and these are the only two links showing in my gwt account. After panda 3.3, google stopped showing me any data in gwt, everything says no data available.
Then one day seoupgrader.com shows up and just yesterday woorank.com shows up. These are seo evaluation sites. Go look at them. I have thousands of links pointing to my site, but none of them show in gwt post panda 3.3.
Are those 60% exact match keywords. For example do you count (money keyword is lcd tv) samsung lcd tv, sony lcd tv, lcd tv for sale, and lcd tv in those 60%.
As far as i know for over 60% phrase match there was always a filter. Many sites of mine tanked due to that, long time before panda updates. These are page related, so when i changed a post urls and i didn't 301 old post to the new one, the ranking was back pretty quicky, after i did proper backlinking.
So i think it is more, lack of links from related sites problem.
What is best (the easiest) way to get links from related sites?
If i am getting links from related pages can this be enough
Strange indeed....I don't think they would single you out though. Piss anyone off lately, did ya?
I've decided to take my stuff out of g ANALytics and WMT. Shenanigans like this and what they've made me go through makes me think: what's the point of letting them in on what I'm doing. It's only made things worse for me.
I read this a few days ago, this information is solid especially the micro sites method he mentions, I've tested this with another member lately on a medium comp site that was hit using his method but with aged web 2.0s all themed to the niche of the money site treating each one as an authority site in itself using every sort of link platforms then linking back to them and some to the money site, the site recoverd quite quickly its highest position before any updates was #4 its returned now to #2
SEO is far from dead.....
![]()
so you didnt create micro sites you created web 2.0s then build so links to them?? did you blast links or did you manually build(i dont know what u mean by every type of link platform)? what type of links were they? im currently working on a similar method but havent seen any results so drastic
what sort of content was used on the web 2.0s etc etc???