new Russian technology

what are the yb2 .. pages on your pic ??
this is the page the second level. their title match the most important related key queries from the centre of the semantic core.
we in Russia are no longer used semantic kernel in the form of lists of keywords. we Rangiroa them in the semantic graph.
we are talking about the degree of semantic influence of each of the queries for the promotion of the basic key center of the semantic graph.
In the satellites page of the second level are made for the strongest keywords. In accordance with the ranking graph.
 
this is the page the second level. their title match the most important related key queries from the centre of the semantic core.
we in Russia are no longer used semantic kernel in the form of lists of keywords. we Rangiroa them in the semantic graph.

ok then for me it looks like a link wheel.
from 1 satellite you link to the other.
on satelite 1 you get links a second level page as you call it
on satelite 2 you link to all second level pages.
from satellite 2 you link to money side
and from the money side you receive links and link to second level pages ....

thats a link wheel and will be probably punished.
these technics worked 2009 as you mentioned but are outdated.
 
ok then for me it looks like a link wheel.
from 1 satellite you link to the other.
on satelite 1 you get links a second level page as you call it
on satelite 2 you link to all second level pages.
from satellite 2 you link to money side
and from the money side you receive links and link to second level pages ....

thats a link wheel and will be probably punished.
these technics worked 2009 as you mentioned but are outdated.
no there is no ring links. where do you see it?

theme works for a long time. Don't look for the catch. I have a very high level in seo. nonsense not say.
much higher than you might think.
I can tell you what you don't know about the new factor RankBrain
Enjoy the moment

here you latched on to this 2009 :)
we are talking about fundamental principles, about which you unfortunately don't even know :)
the use of this technology can't even ban! Because it will break the whole search engine. It is the Foundation of his work.
 
too much vodka ? ayy lmao.
substitute a glass, here you go :)
but seriously, you really are very far behind in technology. but I emphasize, only in the reference ranking.
 
no there is no ring links. where do you see it?

theme works for a long time. Don't look for the catch. I have a very high level in seo. nonsense not say.
much higher than you might think.
I can tell you what you don't know about the new factor RankBrain
Enjoy the moment

here you latched on to this 2009 :)
we are talking about fundamental principles, about which you unfortunately don't even know :)
the use of this technology can't even ban! Because it will break the whole search engine. It is the Foundation of his work.


Can you proof any page you ranked ?????
 
ok then for me it looks like a link wheel.
from 1 satellite you link to the other.
on satelite 1 you get links a second level page as you call it
on satelite 2 you link to all second level pages.
from satellite 2 you link to money side
and from the money side you receive links and link to second level pages ....

thats a link wheel and will be probably punished.
these technics worked 2009 as you mentioned but are outdated.
I don't know where you saw the reference ring?
can you explain?
because the picture clearly shows the structure of the three sites. there is no wheel.
you do not understand.
feedback exists due to the INTERNAL circuitry of the algorithm the search engine of the bonus trust. Anything wheel do not link. Everything is clean. All white.
 
Can you proof any page you ranked ?????
you information important or regalia?
I am among the 5 most famous seo experts in Russia. each of us specializiruetsya on your niche. We don't bother each other and not compete.
I already 2 times you asked about the weight references. response although some sort of will? have you got a taboo?
I developed the web service by measuring the weight of the links, for the semantic kernels in the request graph.
my investors the biggest players in the market.
sape.ru and others.
In turn, the owner sape.ru the largest Russian Aligarh Obramovich.
I worked in the systems of automatic link building was their developer.
:) not to brag. Just you have the opportunity to ask me what you interesting. if it falls into the scope of my competence, I will try to answer.
 
RankBrain not effective for simple queries. It is designed to determine an intent of a complex of low-frequency queries.
He also works on the same principle as a machine translator from one language to another.
Different language models have their semantic graphs in decarto. They are matched by the centers and is located optimalnoe a coordinate match. The best match is the analogue of the translation of the concept.
another 10 years and the language barrier will disappear completely.

RankBrain modifies the design of the request, specify it on the same principle within a linguistic model. High-frequency queries its impact on vidco minimal.
Google will soon create a separate company that will sell interpreters in real time.
will not fool will not invest in this company.
Google, in turn, will get access to all negotiations of this kind between people. It will index the offline content.

what else you want to know? and answer my question please, at the expense of the weight of the links. I will share with you the information on the page rank
 
Last edited:
you information important or regalia?

I already 2 times you asked about the weight references. response although some sort of will? have you got a taboo?
I developed the web service by measuring the weight of the links, for the semantic kernels in the request graph.

the bold red text is no english which i do understand ....... maybe someone can explain me but for me it makes 0 sense ...
 
I am among the 5 most famous seo experts in Russia
CommentPhotos.com_1395084668.jpg
 
the bold red text is no english which i do understand ....... maybe someone can explain me but for me it makes 0 sense ...
like this?
you go to the store to buy meat. You don't look on the scales? As the weight of links for you does not make sense? explain?
You generally spend money on buying links?
you still how much weight they convey? the impact they have on search results?
you are not counting their money for website promotion?
I do not explain, or ask a strange question?
 
and that surprises you? I have something like your Rand Fishkin, only in Russia. it looks strange? :)
let this:
forget about my regalia. Ask what interests you. The benefits will be greater.
 
you have a measurement of the weight of the links taboo?
you don't understand what are you talking about?

Google SEOs use Majestic and Moz, Yandex SEOs use TCI. Worlds apart.
 
Google SEOs use Majestic and Moz, Yandex SEOs use TCI. Worlds apart.
and what's the weight of links and the TIC?
we are talking about the weight of each individual link and not on the total value for the entire site.
You do not know what weight the links?
you don't understand why you need to weigh each?
explain to me your relationship to the weight of EACH link.
 
do you really rely on PR to understand the weight of the link from this page???? :) :)
you crazy??!! :)
Is the weight value of the link?
It's the stone age!!!
You don't know what the weight of the links depends STRONGLY on the anchor links?
Not the ANKOR put on the website with PR8 and no weight, the link will not pass!!! Do you not understand? And are willing to pay 1000 dollars for a link from page pr=8??!!
:) :)
you do not mind the money? :) Such a reference is USELESS!
 
Google SEOs use Majestic and Moz, Yandex SEOs use TCI. Worlds apart.
you don't seem to understand why Google stopped supporting pr.
the fact that your method of determining quality links for PR does not match the actual weight. it and then removed, so that you do not appreciate the weight of references! It hurts the quality of search results. It is not clear?
do you think that PR was removed to hide from you the ability to put links?
on the contrary!!! It was removed to lice links are better, so that you are focused on more!
Your evaluation method links began to HURT Google! Here we clean PR!!!
You amaze me the ignorance of basic things!

now I understand why you find not important weight measurement references.
you use idle methods. And rejoice in their ignorance :)
 
I have loved you, I'll teach you. :) as we say :)
I can tell you the real quality metrics in Google links...
God, what ignorance...
 
Back
Top