new Russian technology

9148130.jpg
 
I have powerful SEO transistors from Russia. PM me if you want some CHEAP. This is new technology from 2009, so I can assure you it cannot be found elsewhere. Hurry while supplies last.
 
Oh, yeah, I know this guy! Tar729 is a fabulous troll form Sape Forum.
Mind your head and keep away.
did you know that the leadership of Sapa is one of the investors in this technology? :) and another big SEO Agency in Moscow.
 
I have powerful SEO transistors from Russia. PM me if you want some CHEAP. This is new technology from 2009, so I can assure you it cannot be found elsewhere. Hurry while supplies last.
your sarcasm is quite clear :) However, the technology works and there are a lot of cases.
 
can't figure out what you are trying to explain. Can someone translate what the op is trying to explain in French..
 
I have powerful SEO transistors from Russia. PM me if you want some CHEAP. This is new technology from 2009, so I can assure you it cannot be found elsewhere. Hurry while supplies last.
you, there is still the page rank I use, I generally keep quiet :)
You do not understand the main thing:
the existence of the feedback is old, and you didn't even know.
This technology may not become obsolete in principle.
Just you just now found out. And we in Russia have long been on it and ride.
 
and can I ask you friends?
do you really still nobody weighs the weight of the links?
How do you determine the effectiveness of a particular links to manipulate search results?
What is the average you have 1 relevant link in the month?
Aren't you interested to buy links maximum impact at minimum cost?
Because the eye of some not obvious how much weight she transmits and how it affects the ranking. The weight of links would increase your productivity 10 times at least!!
 
What I'm gathering is that Russians like to separate their tied 1s into two groups. One that passes "commercial intent" and "topographical relevancy"

Not sure how the former helps in rankings
 
What I'm gathering is that Russians like to separate their tied 1s into two groups. One that passes "commercial intent" and "topographical relevancy"

Not sure how the former helps in rankings
here's how I Google translated your message.:)

"I understand that the Russians like to separate them tied 1C into two groups. Who will be the "meaning" and "topographic matching"

Not sure how the former helps in the ratings
 
What I'm gathering is that Russians like to separate their tied 1s into two groups. One that passes "commercial intent" and "topographical relevancy"

Not sure how the former helps in rankings
the weight of links consists of two parts:

1) semantic meaning. It is encrypted coordinates of the concepts in the semantic graph http://sub.levsha-instruments.ru/uploads/images/articles/2DoC0oAiGY.jpg
here the large circles show the high frequency words
2) trust

Both of these characteristics make up the weight links
 
you ask questions don't be shy...I know a lot :)
almost as Matt Cutts
 
links on nofollow prohibited the transfer of trust and semantics are allowed.

the meaning of the concept is enclosed in the coordinates of the semantic graph.
trust can flow as in communicating vessels, and the semantics are only copied. its number is not reduced.
 
you have a measurement of the weight of the links taboo?
you don't understand what are you talking about?
 
this once again confirms how hopeless you are from us, Russian behind :)
 
Back
Top