Negative SEO against all major domains?

_zeroone

Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
Just talking theory.
If a ton of people all set their tools to always, 24x7x365 create the same junk links to the big domains as we do to our sites, wouldn't that help the cause?
It would make junk links look more natural?
 
1. Manual Action from Google, no help at all
2. Nasty law suit
 
They have too much authority for a handful of guys to make them drop permanently. You might get some inner page dancing if you work at it, but beyond that, you will need A LOT more, and you can still have Google manually override it and get them their ranks back.
 
Get some job bro. this will not pay you for your hardwork.
 
actually there are peopel doing that but nto for the biggest sites but other small ones ranking top10.

lawsuit? the only people that shoul get lawsuit for this - is google for lettign neg seo work so good
 
You won't hurt them their backlink profiles are way too massive to push them one way or another. I'm sure Google has a "whitelist" of big domains anyways that wont allow for negative seo to affect those domains.
 
It'll never happen Googles given them a golden ticket....

golden-ticket.jpg
 
Last edited:
Please can anyone here help me with deface facebook mail ? I really need help on this..thanks and sorry for bothering u
 
They have a reputation in the eye of Google. I don't think so you can blast them with bad links.
 
Negative SEO is protected free speech. I'll say whatever the fuck I want, wherever the fuck I want, and link TO wherever the fuck I want, and as often as I want.
 
Read about Trust Rank. There are authority domains that simply can't be touched.
 
You are doing a great job and i hope in future you will keep update us. I read lot of articles on this topic and finally i got some valuable information from here that will help me a lot.
 
anyone saying that big sites have a golden ticket or are protected obviously hasn't really experimented.

I have been able to neg seo tripadvisor pages. I've taken pages from top 10 to not in top 1000. I've done it multiple times. I'm not saying that you could get their whole site deindexed or anything, but you certainly can neg seo an inner page.

And tripadvisor is part of the google "internet alliance"
 
your xrum/scrapebox blast will only help them :)

Their authority wont be destroyed by negative seo done by few guys, unless you do something really big (and waste lot of time/resources which will gain you nothing as they'll bounce right back with a manual review)
 
I do not think that ZeroOne is properly expressing what he wants to discuss.

Everyone is speaking of negative SEO. I do not think that is what Z1 was getting at. As an example, many here use AA blogs for links. Over time those blogs become well known spam sites and G devalues any link from them. However, if large domains also had many links from those site, then G would have a much harder time devaluing the links without also affecting the larger domains. This would have the practical effect of mitigating any action G may take to devalue a link from a spam site, and would also make it much more difficult to tell if a site was a spam site or not. Many of those larger domains are paying customers to G, and it is not a good thing to piss off your paying customers.

What I believe the OP addressed was not negative SEO, but rather protective counter measures and monkey wrenches in the gears.
 
I seriously doubt that negative seo works on a semi-good site, let alone some top authority sites; if it did, I would've neg SEOed Google out of Google
 
If they keep track of the backlink profile then they will just disavow all of the spam links but if someone really wanted to take down a site with enough persistence, money, tools, and know how i believe they could do it maybe not just by backlinks but publishing their content on other sites before it is indexed etc.
 
Total waste of time and resources
I like to use my time for making money
 
Back
Top