Search KGR in the search bar you will get some threads talked about it.
Also, you know KGR coined by a guy, you can easily find his blog to read more details, allintitle also has some tips, tricks, plus tool explicitly built for this purpose, never tried that myself though.
Some members here shared tricks to find KGR keywords, please search it. Or site:blackhatworld.com KGR
Don't do KGR man. Times have changed, KGR is no longer a good way. It's all about topical relevancy now.
I doubt KGR would be bad for him - there's good reason with the formula - not entirely bulletproof but a lot of the KGR keywords rank fast still.Don't do KGR man. Times have changed, KGR is no longer a good way. It's all about topical relevancy now.
I doubt KGR would be bad for him - there's good reason with the formula - not entirely bulletproof but a lot of the KGR keywords rank fast still.
Even Mods here recommend it/
Best for someone who needs traction in the first few weeks-months and for someone who doesn't have much budget with link building.
Topical relevancy is kind of a replacement to backlinks, without google removing backlinks from it's system.
Who's more of an expert on a topic? Someone who has 300 articles, or new york times who has 1 article but lots of backlinks
I don't doubt you can rank with KGR, I've done it myself, but it's incredibly inefficient in comparison to topical relevancy in my opinion.
I follow your method (your old Keyword Research Thread) + KGR - it was such a great help.I won't be sharing my methods because it works well and it defeats the point of KGR if people know how to scale to tens/hundreds of thousands of keywords, there will be barely any KGR terms left, it's already tricky if not impossible in some niches.
If you don't want to do the work yourself I recommend outsourcing.
IMO KGR and topical relevance go hand in hand. The keywords are often very specific and aren't covered online so by answering terms you get higher rankings, easy traffic, topic relevance etc. I agree though, KGR can be hit or miss, you need a good 20+ articles to see correlation and to see results. Some do crap some ok and some knock it out the park and can get heaps of traffic. I think a mix of big long form content and KGR is useful.
@rajputt65
Most people do this manually, there's ways of automating but I doubt you'll find anyone discussing how (I know I won't be). I won't be sharing my methods because it works well and it defeats the point of KGR if people know how to scale to tens/hundreds of thousands of keywords, there will be barely any KGR terms left, it's already tricky if not impossible in some niches.
- Do keyword research
- Check for KGR
If you don't want to do the work yourself I recommend outsourcing.
I completely agree with you - it's just that earlier you told OP to drop KGR - when it's one of the options that would benefit him.I agree to some extent, this is just my opinion as there is no "right" way to do SEO, there is only a wrong way, and I don't see KGR being a wrong way as it can bring in traffic.
I've found that low comp topics bring me in much more traffic than KGR terms ever did, as I gain more and more articles, I move up the competition with topics and topic size.
I also found the topics from KGR hard to write good content for, I personally feel it's a KGR keyword for a reason, I.E a lot of the ones I found were outdated products on amazon that are no longer supplied, or specific questions that were really really specific and found it hard to write an article for such a specific question. And even then it didn't have much search volume in it's keyword cluster. Ergo I personally class it as inefficient,
But for some people it works, so I don't doubt it as a viable strategy, it was just a very inefficient strategy for me.
I completely agree with you - it's just that earlier you told OP to drop KGR - when it's one of the options that would benefit him.
Other than that, I completely agree with you, there's no 'definite' way. But giving him options that has a good possibility to work is still giving him good options
I doubt KGR would be bad for him - there's good reason with the formula - not entirely bulletproof but a lot of the KGR keywords rank fast still.
Even Mods here recommend it/
Best for someone who needs traction in the first few weeks-months and for someone who doesn't have much budget with link building.
Find relevant keyword ideas. One of my favorite ways to find KGR compliant terms is to use Google Autosuggest and this format:
Filter out keywords with search volume higher than 250.
Find the number of websites with exact match titles.
Topical relevancy is kind of a replacement to backlinks, without google removing backlinks from it's system.
Who's more of an expert on a topic? Someone who has 300 articles, or new york times who has 1 article but lots of backlinks
I don't doubt you can rank with KGR, I've done it myself, but it's incredibly inefficient in comparison to topical relevancy in my opinion.
IMO KGR and topical relevance go hand in hand. The keywords are often very specific and aren't covered online so by answering terms you get higher rankings, easy traffic, topic relevance etc. I agree though, KGR can be hit or miss, you need a good 20+ articles to see correlation and to see results. Some do crap some ok and some knock it out the park and can get heaps of traffic. I think a mix of big long form content and KGR is useful.
@rajputt65
Most people do this manually, there's ways of automating but I doubt you'll find anyone discussing how (I know I won't be). I won't be sharing my methods because it works well and it defeats the point of KGR if people know how to scale to tens/hundreds of thousands of keywords, there will be barely any KGR terms left, it's already tricky if not impossible in some niches.
- Do keyword research
- Check for KGR
If you don't want to do the work yourself I recommend outsourcing.