Need Solid Spam method to Rank fast

piter2008

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
238
Reaction score
13
Hello, BHW members

I want to rank different-2 Low competition keywords in Search engine. I want instant ranking for few days only like one week or two.

I know many of you recommend me churn and burn method but i am working for event base blogs So every event is different-2
If you have any good method please tell me.

PS:- Don't tell me crap quality and slow and study wins the race. I am on BHW
 
Last edited:
Thanks for spell check :P i will be happy if you share your experience also
 
Thanks for spell check :P i will be happy if you share your experience also

Well, first of all, you need articles, lots of them. If you already have those, build backlinks, blog comments and what not to your articles and site, then spam your tier 1 links to death, if you want to rank fast, churn and burn is the way to go.
 
Yes buddy I have articles. My website is about like daily news. article quality is good (All articles are rewritten) buy i am confused if i make too many backlinks in few days i will be kicked out :O

"Spam tier 1 links to death" soo i don't need to make tier 2 links ? because tier 2 will take more time. If i make web 2.0 like wordpress etc as tier 1 links and spam to death.. it will work ?

Do you know any working churn and burn method ? or any link where i can study.
 
Do you know any working churn and burn method ? or any link where i can study.

There are tons of them on this site; as long as you are fine with having to replicate the process, if you can, over and over again to make a living, it is a viable business model.

If you want to make a decent living and not have to continually start over, you may want to operate a little differently.

I personally do not see using the short sighted C&B method on a daily news site as that could be a nice long term revenue generator for you for years.
 
@BassTrackerBoats

I agree with you but these days google search is mystery for long term blogs. not all long term blogs will get success.
I know there are many C&B methods on BHW but all are old before google update.

As i know already told you. I want to rank for 1-2 weeks after that no need. News is old, so no searches. if you know good seo service or working method please check. thanks
 
@BassTrackerBoats

I agree with you but these days google search is mystery for long term blogs. not all long term blogs will get success.
I know there are many C&B methods on BHW but all are old before google update.

As i know already told you. I want to rank for 1-2 weeks after that no need. News is old, so no searches. if you know good seo service or working method please check. thanks

I've owned daily news type sites and there are plenty of searches for older stories but if you want to just churn and burn that is fine but you will be burning the entire site, not just pages so if you do that plan on a new site every few weeks.

Is that what you are looking to do with your internet marketing business?
 
@BassTrackerBoats

Not agree with all what you said. I saw many news site which are ranking for event/popular keywords in google for few days, but their overall ranking is very bad... they ranked on time using C&B.

NO i don't want to make new blog every week but a blog every month or two month will be ok for me. Because you know for news sites content is rewritten. I can't write whole new original story because it already said by hundred of blogs.

If you know any long term method which is good please tell me I will try.. I was happy with my long term blogs with authority but google shit updates make me to try spam and C&B :(
 
It's simple Do it by hand and be satisfied or buy a link whore and you will get crabs after a week.
 
@BassTrackerBoats

Not agree with all what you said. I saw many news site which are ranking for event/popular keywords in google for few days, but their overall ranking is very bad... they ranked on time using C&B.

NO i don't want to make new blog every week but a blog every month or two month will be ok for me. Because you know for news sites content is rewritten. I can't write whole new original story because it already said by hundred of blogs.

If you know any long term method which is good please tell me I will try.. I was happy with my long term blogs with authority but google shit updates make me to try spam and C&B :(

I know you aren't going to want to hear this, but I am going to tell it to you anyway.
Start a niche specific news site and rank it for the long term. Then every time a new
news story comes out you already have an aged site to release the publication on.

Churn and burning news would look like a Tom & Jerry episode.
 
The url shortener 301 redirect method might work. I've been using url shorteners alongside root domain redirects but the root domain redirects don't work anymore for me. Maybe Google has devalued the tactic.
 
I know you aren't going to want to hear this, but I am going to tell it to you anyway.
Start a niche specific news site and rank it for the long term. Then every time a new
news story comes out you already have an aged site to release the publication on.

Churn and burning news would look like a Tom & Jerry episode.
thanks for this info..do u provide a niche specific news site creation service>??do you know of any..?
 
If you are set on going the C&B route rather than long term... Why make your own news site for this? It makes no sense logically and financially.. If you are planing to C&B then why not use a parasite news site (news9 is a solid one), you can get your articles on these very easily through a good press release, now these will be very high authority sites that can take a hammering without the whole site being smacked - get your article posted then fire with all guns blazing, the page with your article should rank easily, simply rinse and repeat each time you need to get a new story out there.

This way would give you the best of both worlds - you still get your stories on news sites but you don't have the hassle of building a new site all the time as you're leeching off the authority of news sites which are already established and which act as great parasites.

As someone mentioned above take a look at the parasite ranking thread I wrote in the Making Money section it may give you a better idea of what I'm taking about.
 
Not agree with all what you said. I saw many news site which are ranking for event/popular keywords in google for few days, but their overall ranking is very bad... they ranked on time using C&B.

Here is what my news story site was back when I had it. I bailed on it as I hated to have to reproduce someone else's work, hated having to be under a deadline for something that I owned and the return on the effort was not there for most days.

It was a business news site with 6 different categories... I don't want to actually share the categories as I sold the site to someone that is doing fairly well with it and that would be kind of crappy to do to him but they were business news related.

I had a different writer for each category (all of them were me under different pen names) and I rewrote stories just like you mention. I would rewrite as many as 10 - 12 a day and would get the traffic for the actual story as you are saying happens. I generated decent traffic on a regular basis, between 1000 and 1500 UV a day and I would get the occasional spike when I hit on something real popular.

A case in point; I wrote about some business that Boston Rob from the TV show The Survivor was getting into and I hit like 8K UV for that article in just one day and the following days were decent as well but the traffic waned as expected. There were others that caused spikes but that was one in particular that I remember.

What happened after a while was that I was getting traffic to the site for many of the KWs in the articles that were not actually related to the news story itself. It could have been the way I rewrote the content and it could have been the way I backlinked the site or it could have been a combination... in any event I was getting that traffic to those stories months after they were written and published.

It is a solid long term method to build long term organic traffic if that kind of site interests you... like I said, I did not care for it after about 8 or 9 months of rewriting news stories. It is not as "passive long term" as I prefer for the kinds of sites I build and, for the effort, the revenue didn't add up for me. You end up with the short term traffic like you are looking at snagging and the long term rankings for a lot of KWs that are part of your news stories.
 
You sound like a Google Spam team researcher... i bet thats why somebody just said "....Matt cutt". Anyway Tommy gave you a perfect answer i dont see any better answer than that!!
 
Back
Top