My recent experiment with 64 Web2.0

David Jones · Feb 7, 2017

in my opinion web 2.0 still works and same as a guest posting, pbn also working.

fb3003 · Feb 7, 2017

barbara83 said:
Exactly this.

I just created 100 web 2.0, using REALLY unique articles ranging from 500-1k words. All of the 100 web 2.0s are new, and not expired. Posted some authority links on the articles along with video and pictures.

Blast GSA to those 100 web 2.0s... and voila within 3days of blasting.. they are all indexed, some are even ranked from page 3-10...

And the website that received the links from the web 2.0.. is now ranked nicely at page 2 for it's main keyword which is a 40k + search keyword, along with it secondary keywords popping up at page 2 - 5. This website got backlinks just from those 100 web 2.0

And no, i didn't even use exact match anchors or partial match anchors. Strictly naked urls/brand/generic

Ehhhhhh.... but anyway SEO is dead. It's time you use google adwords OP

any chance you captured key metrics like TF & PA before and after you had web 2.0 placed? I am really interested to see if you were able to improve on those metrics as the result of your web 2.0.

thanks in advance

Nargil · Feb 7, 2017

fb3003 said:
any chance you captured key metrics like TF & PA before and after you had web 2.0 placed? I am really interested to see if you were able to improve on those metrics as the result of your web 2.0.

thanks in advance

Google doesn't care about the metrics. And unless you are buying or registering an expired web 2.0, neither should you. It's already in place and only thing you should care about is SERP improvement.

V · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Right. So what exactly is good content? So basically, what I presume you did:

- You built 64 fresh web 2.0s.
- You put, and I am pretty damn sure, spun content on them, because I honestly doubt you would use 64 unique articles for this kind of purpose and I also doubt you have hand created them.
- None of them got indexed, because they have no backlinks, content is shit and even that shit is just a little shitty shit, because you didn't bother to put more than 1 article there.

And now you are crying that web 2.0s are not getting indexed. Wake up, it's 2017 and you are apparently still stuck in 2014.

Either get expired web 2.0s or build a decent tier 2. And unique hand written non-spun shit content is a must. Then repeat the test and come back and tell us how dumb you were.

barbara83 said:
Exactly this.

I just created 100 web 2.0, using REALLY unique articles ranging from 500-1k words. All of the 100 web 2.0s are new, and not expired. Posted some authority links on the articles along with video and pictures.

Blast GSA to those 100 web 2.0s... and voila within 3days of blasting.. they are all indexed, some are even ranked from page 3-10...

And the website that received the links from the web 2.0.. is now ranked nicely at page 2 for it's main keyword which is a 40k + search keyword, along with it secondary keywords popping up at page 2 - 5. This website got backlinks just from those 100 web 2.0

And no, i didn't even use exact match anchors or partial match anchors. Strictly naked urls/brand/generic

Ehhhhhh.... but anyway SEO is dead. It's time you use google adwords OP

These two are the best replies to your experiment about web 2.0s not getting indexed. I manually create all my web 2.0s with hand-written/manually spun content, and ALL OF THEM ARE INDEXED. Follow Nargil's advice, and use manually rewritten articles if you cannot afford unique hand-written articles. Then create some backlinks to these web 2.0s and you will rank for sure.

Don't believe people who say that seo is dead, they are most probably already banking hard with seo and doesn't want you as their competitor for all you know.

Don't come to conclusions so fast in SEO bro, Google is much more than a mere 64 web 2.0s not getting indexed.

TyperX · Feb 7, 2017

web2.0 get indexed very easy so it's hard to belive you couldnt index your sites mate..

fb3003 · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Google doesn't care about the metrics. And unless you are buying or registering an expired web 2.0, neither should you. It's already in place and only thing you should care about is SERP improvement.

Thanks for chiming in.

I hear you. But isn't there at minimum some correlation between those metrics and serp?

Nargil · Feb 7, 2017

fb3003 said:
Thanks for chiming in.

I hear you. But isn't there at minimum some correlation between those metrics and serp?

Between metrics and Serp... minimal. I can be ranking with 200 hidden PBNs and have TF of 0 or I can be ranking nowhere and have 200 high TF blog comments and have TF of 40. So correlation there is pretty small. Also, TF and metrics measure only off site SEO, so even though the site has high metrics, it may not rank for crap, due to terrible onsite, super hard KWs, etc.

godspeed007 · Feb 7, 2017

OP you really need to check the quality of your web 2.0s. All of my web 2.0s usually get indexed within a couple of days. Key is to add high quality content in the web 2.0s and build decent quality Tier 2 followed by a lot backlinks in Tier 3.

fb3003 · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Between metrics and Serp... minimal. I can be ranking with 200 hidden PBNs and have TF of 0 or I can be ranking nowhere and have 200 high TF blog comments and have TF of 40. So correlation there is pretty small. Also, TF and metrics measure only off site SEO, so even though the site has high metrics, it may not rank for crap, due to terrible onsite, super hard KWs, etc.

so with that said, assume you had $X amount to spend, would you spent it on improving your PBN or build another PBN backlink?

by spending, I mean making sure that the PBN or Web 2.0, carry more authority with it.

Nargil · Feb 7, 2017

fb3003 said:
so with that said, assume you had $X amount to spend, would you spent it on improving your PBN or build another PBN backlink?

by spending, I mean making sure that the PBN or Web 2.0, carry more authority with it.

Don't build tier 2 to your PBN domains. Ever.

I would spend it on either stronger tier 2 for web 2.0s if it's not good enough and for expanding the PBN network.

Jeffersontalks · Feb 7, 2017

Easy, just search on Google and see if you can see any web 2.0 site coming up. If no, that means web 2.0 is not being indexed.

fb3003 · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Don't build tier 2 to your PBN domains. Ever.

I would spend it on either stronger tier 2 for web 2.0s if it's not good enough and for expanding the PBN network.

can you explain a bit why we should not building tier 2 to PBN domains? also, would you consider building web 2.0 to PBN a mistake as well?

Nargil · Feb 7, 2017

Jeffersontalks said:
Easy, just search on Google and see if you can see any web 2.0 site coming up. If no, that means web 2.0 is not being indexed.

Amazing insight. Thank you! I've been waiting for this answer all my life! Illuminated at last! Oh the Light!... no.

fb3003 said:
can you explain a bit why we should not building tier 2 to PBN domains? also, would you consider building web 2.0 to PBN a mistake as well?

Web 2.0s would be fine, but that's still a waste of money. You will only leave a footprint, especially if you are new to this, and your PBN will last much longer if you won't do any funny stuff like that. Rather invest the money into a better domain. And if you are building some automated web 2.0s, then you deserve some online slap for that.

thannish · Feb 7, 2017

Hi,

Can you please PM me 64 blogs???

Jeffersontalks · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Amazing insight. Thank you! I've been waiting for this answer all my life! Illuminated at last! Oh the Light!... no.

Web 2.0s would be fine, but that's still a waste of money. You will only leave a footprint, especially if you are new to this, and your PBN will last much longer if you won't do any funny stuff like that. Rather invest the money into a better domain. And if you are building some automated web 2.0s, then you deserve some online slap for that.

Haha.. Meant to be a light hearted joke. Thanks for spicing up.

Nargil · Feb 7, 2017

Jeffersontalks said:
Haha.. Meant to be a light hearted joke. Thanks for spicing up.

The joke is on me then. Apologies.

creativeshuvo · Feb 7, 2017

just create a 10 quality web 2.00. with medium quality content not spun. Also use some expired tumbler. you have to follow some rules for creating web 2.00 for getting better results otherwise all hard work will go in vain. one thing i would like to mention web 2.00 still works

blowitoffer · Feb 7, 2017

Its all about quality these days, if you want your properties to index, make them worth it first.

TyperX · Feb 7, 2017

yeah, you can alway try adding web2.0 to gogle add url tool and it will index very fast

fb3003 · Feb 7, 2017

Nargil said:
Amazing insight. Thank you! I've been waiting for this answer all my life! Illuminated at last! Oh the Light!... no.

Web 2.0s would be fine, but that's still a waste of money. You will only leave a footprint, especially if you are new to this, and your PBN will last much longer if you won't do any funny stuff like that. Rather invest the money into a better domain. And if you are building some automated web 2.0s, then you deserve some online slap for that.

no automated web 2.0. pure manual web 2.0 with good content that is relevant to the PBN it is linking to. is that ok?

also, what OK link building do you consider safe and useful for increasing PBN authority? assuming social media share is one of them.

My recent experiment with 64 Web2.0

Regular Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

BANNED

Elite Member

Elite Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

Senior Member

Newbie

Junior Member

Elite Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World