1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

My recent experiment with 64 Web2.0

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by letmesleep, Feb 7, 2017.

Tags:
  1. letmesleep

    letmesleep Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    My recent experiment with 64 Web2.0 shows that none of them is get indexed after 2 weeks even using one of the best paid indexer service. So please don't waste your time on web2.o

    My one Friend already mentioned the same on his group but I think to give a try and i created 64 web2.0 using good content but somehow none of them is not indexed

    I didn't use wordpress & blogger since I still believe they should be buffer site, not to use them as web2.0 as they have more worth than a mere backlink

    All web2.0 was do follow and normally my ******** web2.0 in past get indexed in 24 hours using the service I am having.

    So guys better to focus on quality content, interlinking of your website and social sharing. Thats all you need

    For backlinks, use good PBN and Guest posting, still they works.

    Should you use Web2.0 ??

    Yes use thme for diversification purpose only.

    Don't use them as your major backlinking strategy. They don't likely to be best to rank your sites now as they were before. But don't exclude them at all. Just have them in your backlinking profile targeting your general anchor.
     
  2. ThatSEO

    ThatSEO Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2016
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Self employed marketing stuff
    Location:
    Sometimes UK
    Could have told you that in 2012
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. ThePozatoOne

    ThePozatoOne Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    52
    SEO is going to shit i tell ya.
     
  4. letmesleep

    letmesleep Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    *2017 :p:D
     
  5. Nargil

    Nargil Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    5,021
    Likes Received:
    3,194
    Location:
    Europe
    Home Page:
    Right. So what exactly is good content? So basically, what I presume you did:

    - You built 64 fresh web 2.0s.
    - You put, and I am pretty damn sure, spun content on them, because I honestly doubt you would use 64 unique articles for this kind of purpose and I also doubt you have hand created them.
    - None of them got indexed, because they have no backlinks, content is shit and even that shit is just a little shitty shit, because you didn't bother to put more than 1 article there.

    And now you are crying that web 2.0s are not getting indexed. Wake up, it's 2017 and you are apparently still stuck in 2014.

    Either get expired web 2.0s or build a decent tier 2. And unique hand written non-spun shit content is a must. Then repeat the test and come back and tell us how dumb you were.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 19
  6. darulez

    darulez Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    3,066
    Likes Received:
    1,067
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Doing Internet Warfare
    Location:
    Bad Neighborhood
    Yeah. SEO is going down.
     
  7. stalin88

    stalin88 Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2016
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    I would have to agree with Nargil. If you get expired Web 2.0, put some decent unique content (doesn't even have to be written content images are OK) and submit to google search console you will be index in 6-12 hours.

    Fresh web 2.0 also work, you just have to build links to them.

     
  8. fb3003

    fb3003 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2015
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    22
    to OP - I suggest to use social media to share those 64 URL's, and then see what happens. Every web 2.0 that I created over the last few weeks have been indexed and show up in ahref and google webmaster tools. I did share all of them on facebook, twitter, pinterest, digo, plurk and few other ones.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. nichexposure

    nichexposure Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    399
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I just pretend to know SEO
    Location:
    2nd Page of Google
    Home Page:
    You build your properties, put one content and sit idle to see when Google will crawl them? As @Nargil said you are still stuck in 2014. I am arguing here not because i have a BST running on web 2.0. As i know how it works, why people are buying it and using it. You have to know the proper way to use it. Either you need to use expired web 2.0 or else you need to to solid 2nd tier links for new web 2.0. And you need to treat your each blog properly not just put single content there and leave it.
     
  10. zebrahat

    zebrahat Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,403
    Likes Received:
    2,927
    Location:
    [email protected]
    Would have to agree with the sentiment that expired Web 2.0 is preferable. I've seen properties with expired accounts and good metrics and backlinks index even without unique content (I've re-used article directory material and recently published press releases), just don't use spun or useless content, and put more than one post on each property.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2017
  11. nichexposure

    nichexposure Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    399
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I just pretend to know SEO
    Location:
    2nd Page of Google
    Home Page:
    Completely agreed. If the blogs has decent links it will index sometime without content. But for fresh one need to use good multiple content. Also social share helps to index quickly :)
     
  12. pathankp

    pathankp Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    15
    can you list or PM me those 64 Web 2.0 sites?
     
  13. barbara83

    barbara83 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2015
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    554
    Exactly this.

    I just created 100 web 2.0, using REALLY unique articles ranging from 500-1k words. All of the 100 web 2.0s are new, and not expired. Posted some authority links on the articles along with video and pictures.

    Blast GSA to those 100 web 2.0s... and voila within 3days of blasting.. they are all indexed, some are even ranked from page 3-10...

    And the website that received the links from the web 2.0.. is now ranked nicely at page 2 for it's main keyword which is a 40k + search keyword, along with it secondary keywords popping up at page 2 - 5. This website got backlinks just from those 100 web 2.0 ;)

    And no, i didn't even use exact match anchors or partial match anchors. Strictly naked urls/brand/generic :)

    Ehhhhhh.... but anyway SEO is dead. It's time you use google adwords OP ;)

     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2017
  14. hippo123

    hippo123 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2016
    Messages:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    437
    What do you guys use for your tier 2s? GSA blast or a mixture of cheap PBN links + Blog Comments + Social book markings?
     
  15. barbara83

    barbara83 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2015
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    554
    See my reply before yours.

    I only use cheap GSAs for tier 2s to my web 2.0 :)
     
  16. hippo123

    hippo123 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2016
    Messages:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    437
    Oops, missed your reply out :) Saw that you use GSA blasts. Do you do a double URL shortener or just blast directly to the web 2.0s?

    Also, what are your web 2.0s removal rates? I had quite a few of them removed after I did a comments blast
     
  17. barbara83

    barbara83 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2015
    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    554
    Blast directly to the web 2.0.

    Very low removal rate... like I said.. i use really unique article and make the articles natural and non spammy-looking :)
     
  18. K.H.R

    K.H.R Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,301
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Occupation:
    Learner
    Location:
    BHW
    I can't agree with you. My web 2 are getting index with in 1 Weeks. Build Quality Web 2, Hopefully you will get index and see the Results.

    Agreed, Great Compliment. Thanks...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  19. redbandit

    redbandit Power Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    BHW
    I ran a test, spun content fresh web 2.0 v/s expired web 2.0 with manually written content. expired 1 - spun shit 0
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  20. sciita

    sciita Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    43
    For me, I don't think any of my web2.0 takes two weeks to get indexed. Actually, they usually get indexed within 1 day or so.

    1. I create new content 300 to 400 words using dragon naturally speaking, and it takes less than 2 minutes.
    2. I add an appropriate image which I get from pixabay.
    3. Then I add my own video or other videos.
    4. Use IFTTT to syndicate my content to all "its" social media pages.
    5. If still new doesn't get indexed within 24hrs then I use this method.

    I use TOR browser. And even then I use VPN on my system. I use "change user agent" plugin and then use Google "SUBMIT URL" too. If your content is unique and your site looks good, it will get indexed within few seconds using this tool.

    At least it works for me.

    I don't use any tool to manage my web2.0 because I have around 10, but seriously high quality. Each of them actually get 50 to 100 daily organic visitors.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2