zixin.yuan
Registered Member
- Jun 11, 2022
- 77
- 43
Hi. I can't recall where did I see the comment
"Google algorithm tends to attach importance to the first backlink acquired from a referring domain, and the late comers from the same domain will be of less impact."
Does it mean, for example,
if I had already improved my rank for the keyword "A" with backlink from referring domain "a",
and then should I aim to improve another Keyword "B" I'd better look for another referring domain? Rather than still working with domain "a" for more backlinks, though, it still has impact, to some extent.
And to view this question from a larger perspective, does it mean that we have to constantly moving forward with more and more referring domains (I mean, what if we want to keep the number of RDs under control)?
"Google algorithm tends to attach importance to the first backlink acquired from a referring domain, and the late comers from the same domain will be of less impact."
Does it mean, for example,
if I had already improved my rank for the keyword "A" with backlink from referring domain "a",
and then should I aim to improve another Keyword "B" I'd better look for another referring domain? Rather than still working with domain "a" for more backlinks, though, it still has impact, to some extent.
And to view this question from a larger perspective, does it mean that we have to constantly moving forward with more and more referring domains (I mean, what if we want to keep the number of RDs under control)?