Boris Jensen
Newbie
- Dec 6, 2020
- 1
- 0
Apologies in advance - this is going to be a long post, but I'm in need of some advice...
We (Erobella, an international escort directory) recently purchased a UK competitor, adultseek.com, and migrated it into the /uk/ subfolder of our domain.
Prior to implementing 301 redirects, we went through a BIG exercise of mapping (in Excel) all of their landing pages with ours, and then 'routing' our landing pages onto their URLs. So, for example:
http://www.adultseek.com/gb/escorts/bristol (the competitor site)
showed (for a few days) the exact same content, <title>, <h1>, etc as
http://erobella.com/uk/escort/bristol/ (our site)
We did this to ensure that when it came to the redirects, we were redirecting landing pages with near 100% equivalence between the two sites. In the past that technique has worked pretty well for us, and seems to transfer much more power than standard redirects.
We only kept this routing live for a few days to avoid running into any cannibalisation problems, and used urlmonitor.com to quickly force index everything.
Then we implemented the redirects.
This all happened at the start of September.
Since then, we've seen some REALLY strange behaviour in the SERP's (see attached), including:
We've done everything we can think of here - double checking 301's, manually re-submitting competitorwebsite.com pages to GSC that are still in the index, etc. But we're running out of ideas.
Have any of you guys seen something like this in a similar M&A domain migration before, and if so what would you recommend? Just sit and wait for Google to sort its shit out?
I’ll literally take any suggestions y’all can throw at me.
We (Erobella, an international escort directory) recently purchased a UK competitor, adultseek.com, and migrated it into the /uk/ subfolder of our domain.
Prior to implementing 301 redirects, we went through a BIG exercise of mapping (in Excel) all of their landing pages with ours, and then 'routing' our landing pages onto their URLs. So, for example:
http://www.adultseek.com/gb/escorts/bristol (the competitor site)
showed (for a few days) the exact same content, <title>, <h1>, etc as
http://erobella.com/uk/escort/bristol/ (our site)
We did this to ensure that when it came to the redirects, we were redirecting landing pages with near 100% equivalence between the two sites. In the past that technique has worked pretty well for us, and seems to transfer much more power than standard redirects.
We only kept this routing live for a few days to avoid running into any cannibalisation problems, and used urlmonitor.com to quickly force index everything.
Then we implemented the redirects.
This all happened at the start of September.
Since then, we've seen some REALLY strange behaviour in the SERP's (see attached), including:
- Some erobella.com pages are popping in and out of the SERP's on a daily basis.
- Some erobella.com pages have dropped out of Google altogether.
- Some erobella.com pages have had a boost in SEO.
- Google is continuing to hold adultseek.com pages in its index, even though (according to GSC) it has recrawled them and seen the 301's.
We've done everything we can think of here - double checking 301's, manually re-submitting competitorwebsite.com pages to GSC that are still in the index, etc. But we're running out of ideas.
Have any of you guys seen something like this in a similar M&A domain migration before, and if so what would you recommend? Just sit and wait for Google to sort its shit out?
I’ll literally take any suggestions y’all can throw at me.