clevercrazy11
BANNED
- Feb 14, 2015
- 299
- 193
Wordpress on the other hand, can help you go up and running very quickly but getting a very professional looking website needs some time invested. Really depends on what you want as final results.
What's your website?The only problems I have so far is setting up a theme for it, photo galleries are a bitch for it if you have a ton of images(hundreds of thousands) but you can easily use a off site image host.
What's your website?
Never heard of Jerkyll, but I'm pretty sure it can't beat Wordpress.
Never heard of Jerkyll, but I'm pretty sure it can't beat Wordpress.
What is jekyll?
I think he means the ease of use. For an average non-technical user, nothing can't beat WP.
I think he means the ease of use. For an average non-technical user, nothing can't beat WP.
It's a site builder that uses a flat file CMS and it creates a static HTML site that you then upload to your web space
There are literally dozens of this type of site builder out now - a lot of them are open source (free)
They are being created because web devs are sick and tired of overblown wordpress and the constant version updating required - and the fact that wordpress is a hacker magnet
There are problems for most amateur webmasters when setting up these new site builders, and you have to use command line or markdown to use them
Years ago I used an adsense sitebuilder PHP script that was dead easy to use - you just installed the script on your web space and uploaded text files to a folder - the text files were keyword1.txt, keyword2.txt, etc, - and when you looked at the site using a web browser there was the site, navigation, articles, etc. - way easier than anything I've researched today (looked at lots) - however, it was old tables based templates, so now outdated
I used just a text editor to make posts and test out stuff.
Where did you find this? I never heard of it and I only WordPress as it’s so simple to use. Anyway, I’ll check it out the CMS.
Can't you just upload posts via ftp?