adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
It cannot be mandatory, it is a European Human Rights Violation. So it's my decision to get vaccinated or not.
Are there really mandatory countries? Which country, China?
I will not be vaccinated!
- Thread starter adalbertmgrm
- Start date
- Status
Are there really mandatory countries? Which country, China?
patriotnews
Elite Member
- Oct 25, 2015
- 1,562
- 1,382
Companies in the US, not sure of other countries, so I am only speaking in the US; have always been shielded from frivolous lawsuits on vaccines, because it serves as encouragement to produce lower margin vaccines vs higher margin dick hard pills.
tylenol and Advil have listed dangerous and deadly side effects. It is a fact of medicine and the body.
correct, in the US, without FDA certification as a vaccine it is for emergency use authorization, cause the cogs of government move slow. Standard disclaimer on all emergency use medicines and such.
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
All different topics and all natural. As I like this part of this forum, I'm usually not active in other parts. (Maybe just for now) But these are important issues that need to be discussed. There are people who want to look at this issue and participate. I open up my experiences and thoughts and am curious about other members' reactions. As long as there is no "Flood" "Spam" and "Advertising" we will be fine.
Anyway. The issue now is vaccines. And the blackhatworld.com science board is discussing it...
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,107
And where would we be without the official BHW Science board... glad we have them around.
I'm still a lab monkey though so I suspect they will be asking for blood, urine, and kidney tissue samples any day from me.
patriotnews
Elite Member
- Oct 25, 2015
- 1,562
- 1,382
Well actually the European Court on Human Rights has said differently, but of course this would need to be relitigated:
“The main rule within international human rights law is that vaccination, like any other medical intervention, must be based on the recipient’s free and informed consent. This rule is, however, not absolute. In Solomakhin v Ukraine, the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) held that mandatory vaccination interferes with a person’s right to integrity protected under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Nevertheless, the Court concluded such interference may be justified if considered a ‘necessity to control the spreading of infectious diseases’ (para 36).”
Source
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
Distrust of vaccines that have been approved for emergency use should never be a laughing stock. Second, many social media outlets, including Google, censor those who criticize the vaccine. It should have been considered normal to want to discuss the risks of a vaccine approved for emergency use. It doesn't seem normal to me that all the media in the world are so optimistic and confident.
Willyfish
Inappropriate behavior toward members + Rule 3.5
- Dec 6, 2019
- 2,494
- 14,243
But when you see something like that :
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617
Why they would not rush a vaccine and sell it and pay doctors to say good things about it if they showed already they care only about the money? and they have no accountability at all if we experiment problems with the vaccine.
I am a little bit scared to trust the largest health care fraud business for my vaccine. Is that not logical?
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,107
None of them are lily white at that level.
- Mar 8, 2009
- 3,247
- 12,747
My suggestion to you is to do what is best for yourself as that what matters the most and feel good about that decision. If you want to see the thread that has talked about this, feel free right here https://www.blackhatworld.com/search/2755918/?q=covid+vaccination&o=relevance. Again, no one is angry with you about your theories, but it has been talked to death here already, so unless you're adding something new to the conversion, I don't see the point of the thread. Just my 2 cents
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
D
Deleted member 141666
Guest
You mean, you have charged your battery 200 times?!
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
You may be right. Next time should be a more original topic. And I know, I actually reviewed them too.
Still, I think it builds an opinion database for the public or social media, and that's valuable.
There is no such criticism and discussion environment even on Twitter. Because they're a damn censor.
patriotnews
Elite Member
- Oct 25, 2015
- 1,562
- 1,382
No one is censoring scientific data on any medication… they are removing harmful information from people who haven’t done any research. There is a difference, when it comes to certain things.
It is like going to a bakery, asking them how to build a nuclear reactor. Yeah… they may be expert cake bakers, but not so good at the thermo nuclear stuff… and just because both processes involve heat doesn’t mean the baker truly has a clue… sure they could say a bunch of stuff, but it would be best to listen to those in the field… medicine works the same way.
Marketing… that fine was for marketing.
the drugs were approved for one use, they learned of other uses and instead of reapplying for additional uses, just marketed it for such.
Like viagra, made for one use, found to have a different use, reapplied for that and marketed it as such.
That is a fine for marketing…
And I am not saying “blind trust”, I didn’t blindly trust, I talked with several doctors about this, and got the vaccine they recommended after I did some research.
See the nice part is, there is tons of free and peer reviewed quality data available on vaccines, mountains of the stuff. Even on the mRNA vaccine over it’s decades of study already, has produced mountains of independent peer reviewed information. All freely available to read. Have you availed yourself of that information? Have you spent 100+ hours reading the studies already done?
Notice, I’m holding the scientific standard of peer review, which is a basic standard, because it excludes garbage studies. So we’re only talking of the independently peer reviewed information readily available on vaccines. Have you spent the time reading and researching all of that?
thevideoguy
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2017
- 397
- 494
You don't have to trust the business much at this stage, enough people are vaccinated to know it's relatively safe and effective.
480,000,000 people fully vaccinated with 2,260,000,000 vaccine doses given and a tonne of data on the results out there. Many clinical trials, meta analysis of trials and data from general vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
If you aren't confident in any of the covid-19 vaccines after 2.26 billion doses and all the research that has been done this far I don't know what to tell you.
If you know it's quite safe and effective, and that it's much safer to get vaccinated then to not and you are still worried about it because a while back a pharma company promoted some drugs in non approved ways then I would say that is not logical, no.
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
The issue of mandatory vaccinations is a very controversial issue. However, if a person is very sick and confirmed, they can be placed under surveillance. But even verifying such a thing is not easy and is an exception. According to the current situation, mandatory vaccination would be such a disgrace that it could go down in history universally. On the other hand, it causes very strong reactions and actions. Maybe only in non-democratic countries it may be mandatory, but I think it is a dream for European countries. People in Europe can take to the streets and scare the government.
But in reality, at the last stage, I think this pandemic will be a fiasco. (I'm not claiming but this is my most sincere opinion)
Crazycam727
Power Member
- Dec 24, 2019
- 785
- 947
this could become 10 pager 
silenzio_im
Banned - Inappropriate behavior
- Mar 19, 2021
- 177
- 212
you are just that type of kid who watches the "HOW VACCINE WORK" and you be "yes i know all, you dont have proof, blablabla"
andyframpton
Senior Member
- Nov 18, 2014
- 865
- 1,374
Just to give you a heads up that there are lots of democratic countries which are not in Europe or the European Union.
Willyfish
Inappropriate behavior toward members + Rule 3.5
- Dec 6, 2019
- 2,494
- 14,243
I didn't spent 100 hours on the researches as I have other things to do, but I am not the type of guy to affirm something without any research at all so I reserve my judgement. what I can say?
I do spend most of my time doing marketing, so when I see a company doing illegal marketing, I can have a good opinion about the company. Same as scammers here, if you do illegal you are banned, it's the rules. Pfizer would be banned from here for illegal marketing, I don't like scammers.
We don't know the long term side effects.
Same as here, cheap pbn links are great and 2 years later the domains drop and you realised you were fucked... we are not even one year into mass testing... Maybe in two years it's like smoking, we will see side effects, nobody can predict this because it's new. Pure logic.
I just know that illegal marketing is absolutely bad and I don't like fraudulent companies that trick poor people, and all these pharmas companies like a mod said before have fraudulent and illegal cases.
If they were on BHW, they would have their ass banned forever already for scamming people. I don't like scammers.
- Status