how to index web2.0s after panda update[2012]
- Thread starter bossanova
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bookmarking indexing links web 2.0s
Almost?
Readability is part of the algorithm (it is even an advanced search tool option).
Scripteen
Elite Member
- Sep 19, 2009
- 1,818
- 1,930
acotut
Elite Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 2,381
- 1,083
Damn you are so smart man,you should work for google or something.
Now go back to warrior forums.
infoasian
Supreme Member
- May 12, 2011
- 1,419
- 438
Sure they know. They also know the size of your underwear
I will consult them next time I need to buy new briefs. hahaha
TheBlueWizard
Junior Member
- Mar 21, 2012
- 170
- 63
Unique Content as in writing fresh unspun articles, or high quality spinning?
By High quality spinning, I'm talking 90%+ in TBS.
I find it hard to imagine there is much of a difference, assuming that the spinning is of superior quality.
cucma
Registered Member
- Dec 17, 2010
- 83
- 7
And you should not write these useless comments dude
HostStage
Elite Member
- May 20, 2010
- 2,083
- 1,836
Lol it is Flame Land here.
Trackbacks, social bookmarks, Xumer blast are a good way to let those indexed.
About unique content, i believe you guys are thinking too high about Big G. When a new viral stuff kicks in and hundred of thousands of blogs talks about the same subject from the same source over and over again. Do you think the content is 100% unique ? It isn't.
Moreover, Google can't read a text, if you spin it properly and you don't use the same article over your whole set of web 2.0 you are good to go. They will eventually know that your content is crap once they measure some visitors metrics though.
So, yeah building also a dozen of high quality web 2.0 or standalone website on B class IP at least.It is a good way to get traffic, and also in a long term it will be more powerful than a dozen of Web 2.0 with 100% bounce rate and pogosticking.
ANd if you want to do things right in spinning. Take an article in another langage, plug it into Google TRanslate, turn it into english and Spin the output
Trackbacks, social bookmarks, Xumer blast are a good way to let those indexed.
About unique content, i believe you guys are thinking too high about Big G. When a new viral stuff kicks in and hundred of thousands of blogs talks about the same subject from the same source over and over again. Do you think the content is 100% unique ? It isn't.
Moreover, Google can't read a text, if you spin it properly and you don't use the same article over your whole set of web 2.0 you are good to go. They will eventually know that your content is crap once they measure some visitors metrics though.
So, yeah building also a dozen of high quality web 2.0 or standalone website on B class IP at least.It is a good way to get traffic, and also in a long term it will be more powerful than a dozen of Web 2.0 with 100% bounce rate and pogosticking.
ANd if you want to do things right in spinning. Take an article in another langage, plug it into Google TRanslate, turn it into english and Spin the output
Last edited:
tylerdale80
Registered Member
- Nov 28, 2008
- 58
- 10
I don't understand the same ip reasoning. How would google know which ip you create your web 2.0 with? Unless you are creating web 2.0 owned by google such as 200 blogspot accounts.
Seoservices004
Elite Member
- Nov 17, 2011
- 1,924
- 359
For Web 2.0 Or Any Back links For Indxeing...Please Do Social Bookmarking ..and it is the Best Way To Index Your Links.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Junkfood00
Elite Member
- Sep 13, 2011
- 1,947
- 1,340
Worst recommendation ever. The xrumer blast will harm the website heavily.
And where did you get the different IPs thing from? It's not like they're connected to each other, they're different hosts.
Also what's up with the text in red being in all of your posts? Stop posting that crap, no one understands it here.
acotut
Elite Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 2,381
- 1,083
My comment is not useless,you're spreading missinformations along this forums and a lot of newbies might take it as good.
SuperLinks
Elite Member
- Jul 14, 2008
- 2,903
- 852
Well usually highly spun content tends to be garbage because its difficult to read it. But, still its content and content that gives Google a reason to index your pages. Often times I see people trying to index thin forum profiles over and over again and Google doesn't have any reason to index those pages. Give Google some content and it's easier to get things indexed.
kaif0346
Power Member
- Jul 13, 2011
- 799
- 127
I am creating a 100s of web 2.0 from same ip manually haven't get any problem yet How can you define, creating web 2.0 from same ip can harm wrok/results??
futurestic06
Supreme Member
- Apr 16, 2011
- 1,204
- 149
I am sorry dude. but all of my web 2.0 are totally OK. I think you should do some social media submission too. Digg them regularly.
Dan Da Man
Elite Member
- May 31, 2011
- 1,851
- 939
I have found with the last update, spun garbage has been a little harder to index. doesn't mean it won't.
I am also finding it that even though they are getting indexed, they are receiving a lot less weight.
Its all about building "quality" tiers. I still blast the shit out of the them for shits and giggles, but not seeing the normal scrapebox blast as effective.
I am also finding it that even though they are getting indexed, they are receiving a lot less weight.
Its all about building "quality" tiers. I still blast the shit out of the them for shits and giggles, but not seeing the normal scrapebox blast as effective.
crzyyoungn
Registered Member
- Nov 24, 2010
- 86
- 19
Jesus the amount of BS in this thread just keeps growing exponentially.
Keep on building links man. The indexability of your posts is determined by the web 2.0 site's authority, your contents uniqueness, and third of all by the amount of links you've built and the spiderability of those links (which then point to your web2.0). So you either have web2.0's that:
-Aren't spun well.
-Are posted on crappy web2.0 sites.
-Don't have enough links pointed to them.
-Or the links you have built aren't easily indexed/spidered.
-Or any combination of the above.
Keep on building links man. The indexability of your posts is determined by the web 2.0 site's authority, your contents uniqueness, and third of all by the amount of links you've built and the spiderability of those links (which then point to your web2.0). So you either have web2.0's that:
-Aren't spun well.
-Are posted on crappy web2.0 sites.
-Don't have enough links pointed to them.
-Or the links you have built aren't easily indexed/spidered.
-Or any combination of the above.
crzyyoungn
Registered Member
- Nov 24, 2010
- 86
- 19
How in the hell is blasting the web2.0's with xrumer going to hurt his money site?
Once again how is blasting THE WEB 2.0's going to hurt his site?
Uniqueness, site authority, and links is all that matters when it comes to indexation. So you could essentially put up 500 words of markoved content on, blogger.com and it should index relatively easily. Whether or not it'll stick depends on how moderated the site it.