aarongoldsten
Junior Member
- Oct 22, 2014
- 177
- 64
what other tool does what gscraper does or better you recommend?
gscraper question
- Thread starter proxygo
- Start date
Alex Goodman
Junior Member
- May 30, 2015
- 105
- 43
PM me your skype or email and I will give you the link to ver 1291
I cannot send PMs or post links yet.
========
Update - Looks like you can't do it as well. )
I cannot send PMs or post links yet.
========
Update - Looks like you can't do it as well. )
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
nice going marc, theres a few proxie types working on this version as i said further back
its not perfect far from it, but its better than nothing....
1 other update, i have pmd HAWKE on skype/bhw and sent tickets to support..no response....
thats why im glad wiz did this
there bhw sales thread shut down for non replying to there customers
in 2 years...and thats shows hawke is all about the money and fck
the buyers here on bhw
Last edited:
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
update gscrapers previous updates 1.3.0.0 80k urls a min.
gscrapers last update 1.3.5 > 0 urls a min <
new update v 1.3.5.6 > 5k urls a min still something wrong here
put simply,
version 129 - 20k urls still, but it will only use a small amount of proxies
version 130 - WAS 40-80k urls a min
version 135 - 0 urls a min
version 1356 - 5k urls a min
anyone see something wrong here everytime they fix it url rate gets worse
gscrapers last update 1.3.5 > 0 urls a min <
new update v 1.3.5.6 > 5k urls a min still something wrong here
put simply,
version 129 - 20k urls still, but it will only use a small amount of proxies
version 130 - WAS 40-80k urls a min
version 135 - 0 urls a min
version 1356 - 5k urls a min
anyone see something wrong here everytime they fix it url rate gets worse
Last edited:
- Aug 7, 2011
- 1,577
- 1,432
Nothing wrong here.
Version 1.3.0.1-1.3.0.5 were not working because search engine detected all Gscraper activity (and blocked all requests from Gscraper). Gscraper team made really big work to make Gscraper work again.
Version 1.3.0.6 is working good but need good proxies. Here is lpm on my side with high quality port scanned proxies:
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
im hitting 30k lpm with half my proxies use to be 80-100k
other batches of my proxies pass the proxy test but dont scrape
so there is still a small issue its passing proxies in a list that dont scrape
lowering the lmp, either these proxies work or dont...
other batches of my proxies pass the proxy test but dont scrape
so there is still a small issue its passing proxies in a list that dont scrape
lowering the lmp, either these proxies work or dont...
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,973
This isn't really related but I was wondering if anyone knew if this was related to a Google change that is affecting other software / services or if it is Gscraper specific?
I have tested my software with all of the proxies I have to hand and all seems to be working fine but obviously there are a lot of different google servers and proxy combinations to try. I would hate for some customers to be unable to use something because I hadn't noticed an issue.
If anyone could enlighten me if this is a change with Google's search results display or a region specific thing that would be a great help.
Cheers.
I have tested my software with all of the proxies I have to hand and all seems to be working fine but obviously there are a lot of different google servers and proxy combinations to try. I would hate for some customers to be unable to use something because I hadn't noticed an issue.
If anyone could enlighten me if this is a change with Google's search results display or a region specific thing that would be a great help.
Cheers.
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
agreed, google is always an issue but to put it into perspective
v129 got fried -
v 130 had half my proxies working half ignore
v131 had all my proxies working
v 135 had none of my proxies working
v136 has all my proxies listed as working but when i tested them in 2
separate txt files as its 2 lists on 2 separate ports 700 proxies each
both passed the proxy test but only 1 file scraped, same issue we had
with v130
i even scraped 1500 proxies with scrapebox and threw them in gscraper now
ude expect maybe couple hundred to work at least man i got 60
v129 got fried -
v 130 had half my proxies working half ignore
v131 had all my proxies working
v 135 had none of my proxies working
v136 has all my proxies listed as working but when i tested them in 2
separate txt files as its 2 lists on 2 separate ports 700 proxies each
both passed the proxy test but only 1 file scraped, same issue we had
with v130
i even scraped 1500 proxies with scrapebox and threw them in gscraper now
ude expect maybe couple hundred to work at least man i got 60
Last edited:
aarongoldsten
Junior Member
- Oct 22, 2014
- 177
- 64
found answer ignore please
Last edited:
aarongoldsten
Junior Member
- Oct 22, 2014
- 177
- 64
let me be honest. i have no idea wtf i'm doing. but I bought 5 "reserve" proxies that are suppose to change every 10 minutes from http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...roxies-free-trial-exclusive-bhw-discount.htmlcorrect me if i'm wrong: the thread count. higher it is, faster it scrapes, but more proxies you need?
how high can i set this if I have '5 reverse proxies' ?
also, is reverse proxies good from that link above or should i just use regular private proxies?
can you give me X:Y for every 1 private proxy I can increase thread by Y?
same for reverse proxies?
ty
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
being around proxy stuff since 2002 my understanding when using shared/private
proxies is keeping the thread count low, and searches as i recall 30 second time out
hi velocity scraping with shared/private ect will get banned fast
u should see this, 600 gscraper checked proxies - 0 urls from new update 136
proxies is keeping the thread count low, and searches as i recall 30 second time out
hi velocity scraping with shared/private ect will get banned fast
u should see this, 600 gscraper checked proxies - 0 urls from new update 136
Last edited:
aarongoldsten
Junior Member
- Oct 22, 2014
- 177
- 64
hey hey!!!! my stuffs workin!!! thanks guys!!!
deth_by_uv
Power Member
- Feb 26, 2008
- 525
- 428
jimbo...
I used NHP to run a scrape on v129...started at roughly 30k and started to drop after a few minutes. Down to 3k...and when I came back after the scrape was done it said 500 LPM average.
Previously when I use proxygo's proxies I'd sustain at least 30k LPM and hit as high as 80k.
I don't think it's Googz changes, I think something is wrong with gscraper possibly.
I used NHP to run a scrape on v129...started at roughly 30k and started to drop after a few minutes. Down to 3k...and when I came back after the scrape was done it said 500 LPM average.
Previously when I use proxygo's proxies I'd sustain at least 30k LPM and hit as high as 80k.
I don't think it's Googz changes, I think something is wrong with gscraper possibly.
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
trevorb sudgested i try my a batch of my proxies that are passing the gscraper test but
not scraping into my browser to see if i can manualy search google, to see if they will do a search.
if those proxies that pass gscraper test but dont scrape but do work then its a gscraper issue.....
i manually pasted a few into firefox searched bhw and got results and was able to load sites.....
so 1k of my proxies that pass the gscraper proxy test but dont scrape do work as they work
manually in my browser for searches on google
not scraping into my browser to see if i can manualy search google, to see if they will do a search.
if those proxies that pass gscraper test but dont scrape but do work then its a gscraper issue.....
i manually pasted a few into firefox searched bhw and got results and was able to load sites.....
so 1k of my proxies that pass the gscraper proxy test but dont scrape do work as they work
manually in my browser for searches on google
Last edited:
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,085
- 26,605
today gscraper support replied to me after 1 month of emailing them.
i sent them a message and screen shot saying im using latest version of
gscraper v1306 with 600 working checked gscraper approved proxies
0 urls - the reply i got was well as dumb as they come.
erm ok ill update to the same version twice im already using getting 0 urls from
600 gscraper approved and test proxies getting 0 urls for improved 0 urls
welcome to the improved version where it tells u your proxys work but does nothing
and yes i no some people are getting urls again thats not my issue, my issue is my gscraper
proxy test is saying 600 of my proxys work but theres no urls
i sent them a message and screen shot saying im using latest version of
gscraper v1306 with 600 working checked gscraper approved proxies
0 urls - the reply i got was well as dumb as they come.
erm ok ill update to the same version twice im already using getting 0 urls from
600 gscraper approved and test proxies getting 0 urls for improved 0 urls
welcome to the improved version where it tells u your proxys work but does nothing
and yes i no some people are getting urls again thats not my issue, my issue is my gscraper
proxy test is saying 600 of my proxys work but theres no urls
Last edited: