1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dont Majestic & SEMRush count web 2.0 links ?

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by omg123, Feb 22, 2016.

  1. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    ive built handmade web 2.0's on sites like blogger & wordpress, about 20 pages each, all unique text, no spun text etc, all the pages are indexed in google,
    in semrush & majestic (for the money site) other (lower quality) links show up for the site that are on tier 1
    but the web 2.0 links do not show, and they have been there a while, and the web 2,0's are all backlinked (and all pages are indexed in google)

    anyone know why the links are'nt showing up ?
     
  2. asap1

    asap1 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,961
    Likes Received:
    3,185
    semrush crawls slower then Moz I think so its pretty useless.

    And Majestic crawls at a pretty good rate it just didn't find your web 2.0s.

    You can submit them to Majestic for crawling or build more links to your web 2.0s

    Doesn't really matter tho, its actually good that they don't show up on Majestic so now your competitors wont see them.
     
  3. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    OK,
    im building more links to the web 2.os

    both of them have found the much lower quality links pointing to my site though, they both found them within a couple of days (about 4 days)
     
  4. SEO Dave

    SEO Dave Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    8
    If they are indexed I wouldn't worry about whether Majestic finds them.
     
  5. ashesofmoon

    ashesofmoon Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    It takes time for them to be indexed and these crawlers can only show what they in their databases.
     
  6. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    thanks
    yes, they are definitely indexed, and all the pages on them are indexed,
    the reason i was asking was because i thought either there might have been a change in weather semrush & majestic counted links from web 2.0 's anymore (because they are known link building sites) or maybe semrush & majestic did'nt count links from these sites anyway.
    but i took the time & effort etc to make these sites handmade because they are on tier 1, and was thinking of the long term use of them, and the links havent shown up in semrush & majestic , but other "lower quality" links have shown up.
     
  7. T0NYS

    T0NYS Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    #Alb-IT
    dude , why the fuck should you worry about that , like for real ?

    As long as the links are appearing on the webmaster tools you're good to go , forget about those crawlers
     
  8. THUNDERELVI

    THUNDERELVI Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,547
    Likes Received:
    2,200
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    W3
    As another member said, it's a good thing that these crawlers haven't picked up on those web 2.0 links yet. As long as they are indexed in Google, you are fine. After all, you are trying to rank in Google, not in Majestic or SEMRush.
     
  9. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    because as i said if majestic etc have stopped recognizing these links then i would use another link analyzer



     
  10. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    because as i said i took time to handbuild them , if they are not being counted anymore then i would'nt waste my time hand building anymore - dude

    everyone knows algorithms etc are continously evolving.


     
  11. ThopHayt

    ThopHayt Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,713
    Likes Received:
    2,557
    Even if they did count it would be one of MILLIONS of OBLs. Not valuable. And virtually everyone would have it as well.
     
  12. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    "MILLIONS of OBLs."

    what are you talking about ?
    it hasnt got "MILLIONS of OBLs." ??????????????////


     
  13. ThopHayt

    ThopHayt Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,713
    Likes Received:
    2,557
    Was thinking your op referring to a scheming to use an indexed page ON majestic or semrush's report page as a link. Was scratching my head about that. No, you're fine. Web2.0's are just fine. I've head that some are going no-index unless you use the "paid" version, but other than that they should index eventually. Google will probably index them faster than semrush or majestic can post them up if you do your seo well.

     
  14. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    OK ThopHayt
    the link is included in googles cache of the page, has been for ages, its just that i put a lot of time & effort into it,
    then the "lower quality" (LOW) links show up in both semrush & majestic after just a few days, but the web 2.0 links ("quality sites" ) had'nt shown up after ages.
    was not a pointless thread - because if something had changed i think others would want to know, and i would not want to spend ages hand building web 2.0's to get no benefit when i can get thousands of spammy links that show up after days.
     
  15. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    "I've head that some are going no-index unless you use the "paid" version"

    I saw that on some of them as well, i try to stick to web 2.0s that have a long reliable history if possible.
    ive built some over the years where the whole web 2.0 site just disappeared



     
  16. charliebrooker

    charliebrooker Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2014
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    292
    Home Page:
    If it's Google indexed, why do you care what any tool says??