Dont Majestic & SEMRush count web 2.0 links ?

[omg123]

ive built handmade web 2.0's on sites like blogger & wordpress, about 20 pages each, all unique text, no spun text etc, all the pages are indexed in google,
in semrush & majestic (for the money site) other (lower quality) links show up for the site that are on tier 1
but the web 2.0 links do not show, and they have been there a while, and the web 2,0's are all backlinked (and all pages are indexed in google)

anyone know why the links are'nt showing up ?

 

[asap1]

semrush crawls slower then Moz I think so its pretty useless.

And Majestic crawls at a pretty good rate it just didn't find your web 2.0s.

You can submit them to Majestic for crawling or build more links to your web 2.0s

Doesn't really matter tho, its actually good that they don't show up on Majestic so now your competitors wont see them.

 

[omg123]

OK,
im building more links to the web 2.os

both of them have found the much lower quality links pointing to my site though, they both found them within a couple of days (about 4 days)

 

[SEO Dave]

If they are indexed I wouldn't worry about whether Majestic finds them.

 

[ashesofmoon]

It takes time for them to be indexed and these crawlers can only show what they in their databases.

 

[omg123]

thanks
yes, they are definitely indexed, and all the pages on them are indexed,
the reason i was asking was because i thought either there might have been a change in weather semrush & majestic counted links from web 2.0 's anymore (because they are known link building sites) or maybe semrush & majestic did'nt count links from these sites anyway.
but i took the time & effort etc to make these sites handmade because they are on tier 1, and was thinking of the long term use of them, and the links havent shown up in semrush & majestic , but other "lower quality" links have shown up.

 

[T0NYS]

dude , why the fuck should you worry about that , like for real ?

As long as the links are appearing on the webmaster tools you're good to go , forget about those crawlers

 

[THUNDERELVI]

As another member said, it's a good thing that these crawlers haven't picked up on those web 2.0 links yet. As long as they are indexed in Google, you are fine. After all, you are trying to rank in Google, not in Majestic or SEMRush.

 

[omg123]

because as i said if majestic etc have stopped recognizing these links then i would use another link analyzer

As another member said, it's a good thing that these crawlers haven't picked up on those web 2.0 links yet. As long as they are indexed in Google, you are fine. After all, you are trying to rank in Google, not in Majestic or SEMRush.

 

[omg123]

because as i said i took time to handbuild them , if they are not being counted anymore then i would'nt waste my time hand building anymore - dude

everyone knows algorithms etc are continously evolving.

dude , why the fuck should you worry about that , like for real ?

As long as the links are appearing on the webmaster tools you're good to go , forget about those crawlers

 

[ThopHayt]

Even if they did count it would be one of MILLIONS of OBLs. Not valuable. And virtually everyone would have it as well.

 

[omg123]

"MILLIONS of OBLs."

what are you talking about ?
it hasnt got "MILLIONS of OBLs." ??????????????////

Even if they did count it would be one of MILLIONS of OBLs. Not valuable. And virtually everyone would have it as well.

 

[ThopHayt]

Was thinking your op referring to a scheming to use an indexed page ON majestic or semrush's report page as a link. Was scratching my head about that. No, you're fine. Web2.0's are just fine. I've head that some are going no-index unless you use the "paid" version, but other than that they should index eventually. Google will probably index them faster than semrush or majestic can post them up if you do your seo well.

"MILLIONS of OBLs."

what are you talking about ?
it hasnt got "MILLIONS of OBLs." ??????????????////

 

[omg123]

OK ThopHayt
the link is included in googles cache of the page, has been for ages, its just that i put a lot of time & effort into it,
then the "lower quality" (LOW) links show up in both semrush & majestic after just a few days, but the web 2.0 links ("quality sites" ) had'nt shown up after ages.
was not a pointless thread - because if something had changed i think others would want to know, and i would not want to spend ages hand building web 2.0's to get no benefit when i can get thousands of spammy links that show up after days.

 

[omg123]

"I've head that some are going no-index unless you use the "paid" version"

I saw that on some of them as well, i try to stick to web 2.0s that have a long reliable history if possible.
ive built some over the years where the whole web 2.0 site just disappeared

Was thinking your op referring to a scheming to use an indexed page ON majestic or semrush's report page as a link. Was scratching my head about that. No, you're fine. Web2.0's are just fine. I've head that some are going no-index unless you use the "paid" version, but other than that they should index eventually. Google will probably index them faster than semrush or majestic can post them up if you do your seo well.

 

[charliebrooker]

If it's Google indexed, why do you care what any tool says??