Do you think this is a good strategy?

gman777

Power Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
715
Reaction score
676
I was thinking to rank for a keyword that shows absolutely no results on serp.

Basically, I'm going to create 10 properties or more, every single property having just one different element. E.g: one wordress.com with 500 words, and 2% kw density, another one with 500 words and 2.5%.

This way I'll be able to see which one is superior right from the start when they'll get index.

What do you think?
 
I was thinking to rank for a keyword that shows absolutely no results on serp.

Basically, I'm going to create 10 properties or more, every single property having just one different element. E.g: one wordress.com with 500 words, and 2% kw density, another one with 500 words and 2.5%.

This way I'll be able to see which one is superior right from the start when they'll get index.

What do you think?
Do you mean you will try to rank obscene things no one would search for like "chocolate hummingbird mountain dew poop" etc?
 
Do you mean you will try to rank obscene things no one would search for like "chocolate hummingbird mountain dew poop" etc?

Yes, exactly, and there's no "background noise", although if I rethink this, it's nothing spectacular, as I can do the same thing with a regular keyword. Me and my ideas...
 
or you just insert these domains to ahrefs and sort by DR
 
Is there enough searches for that keyword? if it 'shows absolutely no results on serp' then might be the reason is there is not enough monthly searches for this kw
 
My keyword is "2017skoormaotootloop".

Google my keyword tomorrow. It's ranked. I guess...
 
right, insert domain in ahrefs / majestic / semrush and sort by DR, thats really very useful, its my own experience

no majestic and semrush dont measure link juice as well as ahrefs does. people say its just metric but Ahrefs' DR is checking site backlinks and their backlink profile/volume. its like a link juice checker
 
no majestic and semrush dont measure link juice as well as ahrefs does. people say its just metric but Ahrefs' DR is checking site backlinks and their backlink profile/volume. its like a link juice checker

Ahrefs classes it as more link juice from a domain like wordpress.org or apple.com on a link list with a OBL of 50+ compared to a link from several contexuals such as Guardian, nytimes with an obl of 10.
 
Ahrefs classes it as more link juice from a domain like wordpress.org or apple.com on a link list with a OBL of 50+ compared to a link from several contexuals such as Guardian, nytimes with an obl of 10.

nothing is perfect but all my ranking websites have a high DR without exceptions
 
Yes, exactly, and there's no "background noise", although if I rethink this, it's nothing spectacular, as I can do the same thing with a regular keyword. Me and my ideas...

:)

Just put them into Semrush and see which of the properties has overall highest ranking positions currently. You can see that in historic data.

or you just insert these domains to ahrefs and sort by DR

And how exactly will this help to determine which property ranks better? DR or any other metrics means fuckall in this regard.
 
No, it's not, google is very smart atm, the days where 2% or 2.5% density could make a difference are long gone. Make quality content and websites and google will be happy.
 
:)

Just put them into Semrush and see which of the properties has overall highest ranking positions currently. You can see that in historic data.



And how exactly will this help to determine which property ranks better? DR or any other metrics means fuckall in this regard.

What? its basically RD + RD of RD.
 
Why post a thread about it? It literally only takes few hours or hire a VA for $2.5/hour and get it done for $10.

Although my opinion is that keyword density is only a de-ranking factor.
 
What? its basically RD + RD of RD.

Where do you get all that confidence to actually comment on SEO related stuff, while being completely clueless in most cases?

Besides the obvious strength of the property itself, there are X other things that matter. For example density. You can make two same web 2.0s, about the same topic, different article, same density and yet one will rank significantly higher than the other.

How does RD + RD of RD and DR and whatever apply to this?

Read this for example, the part about parasites. That's how it works - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/5...egies-tips-advice-inside-15-000-words.821874/
 
Where do you get all that confidence to actually comment on SEO related stuff, while being completely clueless in most cases?

Besides the obvious strength of the property itself, there are X other things that matter. For example density. You can make two same web 2.0s, about the same topic, different article, same density and yet one will rank significantly higher than the other.

How does RD + RD of RD and DR and whatever apply to this?

Read this for example, the part about parasites. That's how it works - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/5-years-on-bhw-some-of-my-favourite-seo-strategies-tips-advice-inside-15-000-words.821874/

haha dont know from where

however how i am clueless? links from places with big rd carry more link juice. its a fact. just because there are 99999 more ranking factors it doesnt mean this one is meaningless, link juice is one of most important ones
 
What? its basically RD + RD of RD.

haha dont know from where

however how i am clueless? links from places with big rd carry more link juice. its a fact. just because there are 99999 more ranking factors it doesnt mean this one is meaningless, link juice is one of most important ones

Christ...

And how RD equals link juice? RD without anything else is meaningless. I can spam whatever with 1 million Scrapebox blast and it will still suck dick.

I will try to explain it to you now. There are various web 2.0 properties. Like Tumblr, Blogspot, Cockblog etc, whatever. Following so far? Good.

He wants to use them, I presume, for ranking purposes. So he takes 20 different web 2.0 platforms. Put a small article with a few sentences there, wait till the shit gets indexed, figures which one is ranking highest and then focus on that one. If you do this 100 times with 100 different articles and 100 different densities, the results will almost always be different. Do you get it now?

Do you get how RD or UR or FFS and OMFG do not apply here? Good.

If you still haven't understood what OP is planning to do, then stop trying and move on please.
 
haha dont know from where

however how i am clueless? links from places with big rd carry more link juice. its a fact. just because there are 99999 more ranking factors it doesnt mean this one is meaningless, link juice is one of most important ones

Dude, this has literally nothing to do with links, you okay?
 
Sounds like a good idea to me op. Do it.
 
Your search - 2017skoormaotootloop" - did not match any documents.:)

My keyword is "2017skoormaotootloop".

Google my keyword tomorrow. It's ranked. I guess...

Yes OP and post results / findings
 
Back
Top