To even start such a debate, one has to understand what words really are:
Words describe a reality experienced by humans. Words are thoughts, feelings and experiences.
One may travel to the most exotic of places but, if he fails to share his experience with others on a deep, engaging and human level, then he might as well not have been there.
On the other hand, when one conveys even the most dullest of experiences in an irresistible fashion, he's set for life since humans are forever hooked on stories: every civilization has theirs.
When you get behind the core principles of writing, you'll understand that words aren't mere tools to be disposed of as you please.
Example:
Alan Moore is known not only for his master pieces but for his views on writing as a whole. He famously claimed that writers are like magicians: whereas a magician might curse you for life, a writer can (and WILL) curse your name for eternity.
The power of writing was often reserved to the elite classes on pretty much every major civilization in history, hell, even today the best writers are often working with the wealthiest, most powerful people out there: from politicians to celebrities, every major figure has a "magician" crafting words for them.
Why am I going in circles here?
To dig deeper on the matter.
You may think that some AI writer can replace a human for your monthly content quota, fair enough. But soon it will make abundantly clear that it can't think for itself. It can't come up with an unique and ingenious way of seeing things. It'll be like all those other "unique" articles that flood our timelines everywhere these days and that make sure to sound alike everyone and speak to no one in particular.
And YES:
AI content is taking over the internet. That's good news if you want to generate large quantities of dull content and maybe bank on it. However, as all things humans, only the most unique will stand out and survive the coming AIpocalypse.
Unless we reach Skynet-levels of AI, it will inevitable doom itself.