BMD vs Sick Submitter Bookmark Submitter

H

HunaPerseida

Newbie

Mar 7, 2012

5

0

• Mar 7, 2012

• #1

Hi there,

I'm considering buying BMD, but i don't know if I can achieve similar results with the bookmark submitter of Sick Submitter if I get a good packet to bookmark (I suppose that I have to pay for it!).

Do you think that is better to get good packets of SS, or BMD offers a better solution for bookmarking?

Thanks mates!

 

oneder

Regular Member

May 7, 2010

284

45

• Mar 7, 2012

• #2

One thing to keep in mind is that Sick doesn't post to the quality bookmarking sites like Digg etc. It only posts to Pligg, Dugg and the like. BMD has about 100 of the better sites plus it can import Pligg and so on.

If you're on a budget Sick is better but BMD is better if you can afford it.

 

H

HunaPerseida

Newbie

Mar 7, 2012

5

0

• Mar 8, 2012

• #3

Thank you, oneder!

I'm short on bugdet right now, so I suppose that I will continue with Sick until I can afford BMD.

 

M

moose123

Regular Member

Aug 5, 2011

354

86

• Apr 16, 2012

• #4

sick you can add your own packets if you can come up with a good one

 

The SEO

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Dec 14, 2011

6,126

3,707

• Apr 16, 2012

• #5

My vote is going with Bookmarking Demon because now it can support the Capcha Snipper and Death by Capcha, as well as easily upload the new pliggs.